Until lately (July 25, 2011), it had been relatively inactive. One well was drilled a couple of years ago by Newfield. Now there are four more wells in the field, all confidential.
It appears the field is pretty much controlled by Newfield at this point; all five wells are Newfield wells. The first well was not all that great, but the good news is that Newfield has a good record of completing wells, and if they went in with four more wells, including two on one pad, it suggests they are confident the field will pay off.
Updated:
- 17946, 86, Newfield, Trigger 1-31H, Fertile Valley, Bakken; t9/09; cum 41K 4/17;
- 20356, PNC, Newfield, Erickson 160-102-18-19-1H, Fertile Valley, Bakken,
- 20247, PNC, Newfield, Christensen 160-102-17-20-1H, Fertile Valley, Bakken
- 20798, 151, Newfield, Solheim 160-102-28-33-1HA, Fertile Valley, Bakken; t9/11; cum 5K bbls 6/12; problems? see below; cum 114K 4/17;
- 20263, 345, Newfield, Pass 160-102-21-16-1H, Fertile Valley, Bakken; t9/11; cum 97K 4/17;
[These are not good wells. Perhaps this is why Newfield, in 2011, complained about the cost of drilling in the Bakken.]
*******************************
Update on #20798
Apparently a work-over rig in early 2012, resulted in a much better well:
BAKKEN | 8-2012 | 31 | 3213 | 3169 | 4593 | 1291 | 0 | 1291 |
BAKKEN | 7-2012 | 31 | 3893 | 4044 | 5852 | 1627 | 0 | 1627 |
BAKKEN | 6-2012 | 29 | 3770 | 3403 | 8680 | 1611 | 0 | 1611 |
BAKKEN | 5-2012 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
BAKKEN | 4-2012 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
BAKKEN | 3-2012 | 7 | 25 | 163 | 72 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
BAKKEN | 2-2012 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
BAKKEN | 1-2012 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
BAKKEN | 12-2011 | 1 | 2 | 224 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
BAKKEN | 11-2011 | 2 | 331 | 0 | 397 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
BAKKEN | 10-2011 | 1 | 2 | 195 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
BAKKEN | 9-2011 | 15 | 816 | 441 | 0 | 1878 | 0 | 1878 |
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.