Monday, August 31, 2026

Back To 1969 Muscle Cars -- Whoo-Hoo! August 31, 2026

Locator: 51607MUSCLECARS.
Pageviews: we should hit 90 million pageviews by the end of this week. Probably late Tuesday night (24 hours from now) or Wednesday at the latest. 

Tropical Depression Five -- Tropical Storm Edouard to hit Houston this weekend. Flooding and gusty winds. 

Gut check: President Trump has reached out to Apple to have the the browser's map change the lake in question to Lake America. No reply yet from Apple, yet. John Ternus is asking what would Tim Cook do? Oh, that's good. Tim Cook is still around.  Later, 6:21 p.m. CT -- September 1, 2026 -- 

*********************************
Notes From X 

Anthropic and Nvidia:


 

Not surprising:


The SPR:


It no longer matters, but once declared "empty," WTI should add 10% in price. I'm hoping:


Venezuela: Valero and Halliburton (and CVX) will be the big winners -- from Barron's --

Why The Recent Enbridge Line 5 Rupture Was Not Widely Reported And Had Not Legs As A Story -- August 31, 2026

Locator: 51606ENBRIDGE.

Why did the recent Enbridge Line 5 rupture not garner more press? Because it's a non-story. It only made the national press for obvious reasons and the story died within hours. 

Why Manned Bombers And Manned Fighters Are Needed -- August 31, 2026

Locator: 51605MIDEAST.

Manned a/c vs drones: I finally understand why manned bombers and manned fighters are needed. Link here. GBU-72 and the GBU-57. "

The GBU-57:


The GBU-72:


Which came first?

Query: Why did they think they needed a 5K GBU-75 after developing a 30K GBU-57?

Reply: this is the abridged version -- 

For Tuesday Morning -- Enbridge -- August 31, 2026

Locator: 51604B.

Manned a/c vs drones: I finally understand why manned bombers and manned fighters are needed. Link here. GBU-72 and the GBU-57. See this blog post.

*****************************
Back to the Bakken

WTI: $86.69. Continues to climb the wall of reality. Whoo-hoo.

New wells reporting:

  • Wednesday, September 2, 2026: 3 for the month, 101 for the quarter, 440 for the year,
    • 42332, conf, XTO, GBU Artemis 32X-13E-N,
  • Tuesday, September 1, 2026: 2 for the month, 100 for the quarter, 439 for the year,
    • 42331, conf, XTO, GBU Artemis 32X-13A-N
    • 41881, conf, XTO, GBU Artemis 32S-13B-S,  

RBN Energy: Enbridge's deal with Sal Creek helps connect deeper to Permian crude and exports. Link here. Archived.

Enbridge announced plans to buy Salt Creek Midstream’s crude-oil gathering business for $600 million on August 26. The deal includes full ownership of the Orla and Wink North systems and a 50% interest in the Delaware Crossing system, giving Enbridge a stronger connection to Permian production. 

From there, crude can move onto larger pipelines Enbridge has ownership of, such as Gray Oak or Cactus II, to Corpus Christi, then to the Enbridge Ingleside Energy Center (EIEC) for export. In today’s RBN blog, we’ll discuss how the deal strengthens Enbridge’s link between Permian production and Texas Gulf Coast export markets.

We’ll start with some background on Salt Creek Midstream, whose early growth was rooted in both natural gas and crude oil gathering. Although we discuss the company’s broader midstream buildout below, the Enbridge transaction includes only Salt Creek’s crude oil gathering business. As we noted in Happy Together, Salt Creek was formed in mid-2017 as a joint venture between Ares Management and ARM Energy. Ares provided the financial backing and investment platform, while ARM contributed midstream operating expertise. Salt Creek moved quickly to assemble a broader Delaware Basin midstream business, signing gas gathering dedications with five producers covering more than 175,000 acres by the end of 2017.

From the outset, the strategy extended beyond local gathering. Salt Creek secured capacity on Kinder Morgan’s El Paso Natural Gas Line 1600 to move Delaware gas toward Waha and western markets, became a minority partner in EPIC Midstream’s NGL pipeline, and contracted 150 Mb/d of capacity on EPIC Crude (see Flick of the Switch). It also developed gas, crude and produced-water gathering systems, giving producers a single provider for multiple services.

Salt Creek’s approach was distinctive because it linked its infrastructure to downstream markets without owning every piece of the chain. It used contracts, capacity rights and joint ventures to connect its gathering systems with major outlets. For crude (colored areas in Figure 1 below), that meant gathering and storage in the Delaware, a route to Wink, capacity on EPIC Crude (non-Enbridge owned and recently renamed Cactus III) and access to export-dock capacity at Corpus Christi. The result was a wellhead-to-water offering for its producer customers.

The Strait Becomes More And More Irrelevant -- August 31, 2026

Locator: 51603MIDEAST.

Link here to Irina Slav.

White House Ballroom -- August 31, 2026

Locator: 51602POLITICS.

The Mideast: after Iran attacked US personnel in Jordan, the only question I have: will it be the US or will it be Israel that takes the lead in attacking Iran in response. 

My hunch: "everyone" will want a piece of the action except any of the other US allies. Iraq, apparently, had no problem with Iran violating Iraq's airspace when attacking Jordan. But, no way, will Iraq "allow" the US or Israel to fly over Iraq to respond.   

Reality: the mainstream media consistently "explains" why Trump is doing the wrong thing; it gets tedious. 

So, one has to seek out stories with a positive spin or a positive headline. Here's one headline, from CNBC, but instead of reporting a positive analysis, well, you can imagine .... but I was surprised to hear that US growth did hit 20% once ...

That 20% growth? Who was president then? Oh, that's right. Mr Donald Trump was president then.  


Meanwhile, don't forget
: 

In her interview with US SecTreasury, Sarah Eisen seems to have forgotten the above. I used to think she was really, really, bright, fair and balanced. 

******************************
White House Ballroom 

 Link here

In a 5-to-4 vote, the court said the preservationists who challenged the construction of the planned 90,000-square-foot ballroom did not have legal grounds known as standing to bring their lawsuit because they were not directly harmed by the project, estimated to cost $400 million.

The majority emphasized that its order was not addressing the legality of the project and instead the question of who could sue to try to block it. But in practical terms, the order was a significant setback to the most serious legal challenge to the project, meaning the president seems likely to be able to complete construction. Halting the project now would probably require a fresh lawsuit from an individual or group with standing, such as Congress, which would be a nonstarter while Republicans control the House and Senate.

In an unusual lineup, Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. and the court’s three liberal justices dissented, saying the construction was “likely unlawful.”

I would have thought Chief Justice Roberts would have known the law / the constitution. Whatever. At least five justices understood what was going on. 

Having said that, it would have been helpful for a Republican Congress to have done the right thing from the beginning.  

Monday, August 31, 2026

Locator: 51601ND_HISTORY.

White Earth: I got a very, very nice note from a reader regarding my post on "white earth." The note meant the world to me. I don't think I've ever had any interest in "white earth" before.

White House ballroom: apparently "good to go." 

The U.S. Supreme Court ruled 5-4 to allow President Donald Trump to continue construction on his controversial $400 million White House ballroom. The decision blocked lower court rulings that had halted the above-ground project. And that's the way it should be. NYT story here. Wow, wow, wow -- Chief Justice ruled with the anti-Trumpers. See more here.

Investing. For the full year, BRK-B has appreciated (no dividends), 0.58% -- 

******************************
Back to the Bakken

WTI: $86.29. Whoo-hoo!

Active rigs: 36. Nice to see.

Three new permits, #43269 - #43271, inclusive:

  • Operator: BR
  • Field: Haystack Butte, McKenzie County
  • Comments:
    • BR has permits for three HBU Sandstone wells, SESE 15-148-98, 
      • to be sited 827 / 955 FSL and 126 FEL.

Seven permits renewed:

  • MRO (4): Cecelia USA, Reunion Bay, Mountrail; Riley USA, Antelope, Mountrail; Bracklin USA, Antelope, Mountrail; and Eslinger, Bailey, Dunn County.
  • XTO (3): three Carus State Federal permits, Lost Bridge, Dunn County.

US Navy Recruiting -- August 31, 2026

Locator: 51600USNAVY.


 Query:

In April, 2026, it was reported that the US Air Force / Space Force met recruiting goals five months ahead of schedule. How is the US Navy doing with regard to recruiting?

Reply:


The 
U.S. Navy is actually doing very well on recruiting in FY2026—and its turnaround is quite striking.

Navy recruiting in 2026

The Navy announced on July 2, 2026 that it had contracted 45,000 future Sailors, reaching its entire FY2026 recruiting objective three months ahead of schedule. 

 

That is particularly notable because:

  • The FY2026 goal was 45,000, about 10% higher than the previous year's target.
  • The Navy had already met its FY2025 goal of 40,600 three months early. 
  • The Navy says the 45,000 figure is the highest number of people signing up for the Navy in roughly two decades. 
  • In April, Navy leadership was already telling Congress that the service was ahead of its recruiting targets and on pace to exceed the 45,000 goal.

 

So, compared with the Air Force and Space Force announcement you mentioned, the Navy's result is remarkably similar—but it came a little later. Air Force and Space Force hit their FY2026 goals five months early; the Navy hit its goal three months early.

 

There's an important distinction, though

 

Meeting the recruiting goal doesn't mean the Navy has completely solved its manning problem.

 

The Navy has been trying to rebuild its personnel strength after the recruiting shortfalls of 2022–2023. In fact, the FY2026 authorized active-duty end strength increased to 344,600, up 12,300 from FY2025.

 

And as recently as early 2026, the Navy still had substantial gaps in actually filling some fleet billets. The recruiting success therefore represents an important improvement in the pipeline, but it takes time for a newly contracted recruit to complete training and become a fully qualified Sailor in a fleet job.

 

The turnaround is substantial

 

The contrast with a few years ago is probably the most interesting part.

In FY2023, the Navy had significant difficulty meeting its accession requirements. Since then, Navy Recruiting Command has changed its approach, including faster processing of applicants, expanded use of data, changes to medical-waiver and tattoo policies, increased recruiter manning, and more targeted marketing. The Navy credits these changes with helping it move from recruiting shortfalls to consecutive years of early goal achievement.


There's also an interesting quantitative progression:

Fiscal yearNavy recruiting result
FY2023Significant shortfall
FY202540,600 contracted, goal reached 3 months early
FY202645,000 contracted, goal reached 3 months early
FY2026 goal vs. FY2025~10% higher

So the short answer is: the Navy is doing very well—arguably one of the strongest recruiting turnarounds among the services. It has now met its recruiting target early for two consecutive years, while simultaneously raising the target substantially.

The bigger question is whether those recruits are sufficient to eliminate the Navy's remaining fleet manning shortages, which is a somewhat different—and more complicated—story.

Schlumberger -- One Of My Favorite Companies -- Nothing To Do With Investing -- August 31, 2026

Locator: 51599SLB.

Tag: AI cooling LDCs SLB Schlumberger

Growing up in Williston, ND, I grew up with Schlumberger.

Now this, link here


*********************************
Disclaimer

Briefly

  • I am inappropriately exuberant about the Bakken and I am often well out front of my headlights. I am often appropriately accused of hyperbole when it comes to the Bakken.
  • I am inappropriately exuberant about the US economy and the US market.
  • I am also inappropriately exuberant about all things Apple.
  • See disclaimer. This is not an investment site. 
  • Disclaimer: this is not an investment site. Do not make any investment, financial, job, career, travel, or relationship decisions based on what you read here or think you may have read here. All my posts are done quickly: there will be content and typographical errors. If something appears wrong, it probably is. Feel free to fact check everything.
  • If anything on any of my posts is important to you, go to the source. If/when I find typographical / content errors, I will correct them. 
  • Reminder: I am inappropriately exuberant about the Bakken, US economy, and the US market.
  • I am also inappropriately exuberant about all things Apple. 
  • And now, Nvidia, also. I am also inappropriately exuberant about all things Nvidia. Nvidia is a metonym for AI and/or the sixth industrial revolution. 
  • I've now added Broadcom to the disclaimer. I am also inappropriately exuberant about all things Broadcom. Now, I've added Amazon. And QCOM.
  • Longer version here.
  • White Earth -- Keeps Popping Up In North Dakota / Minnesota History -- August 31, 2026

    Locator: 51598NATIVEAMERICANHISTORY.

    A reader posted an item over at Facebook on the largest lake in Minneapolis, MN, in response to renaming of lakes. Apparently, as with Lake Ontario, there is a huge subset of Minnesotans that have trouble with lake names, and particularly with the renaming of lakes. LOL. 


     I was curious with regard to another issue.

    Query:

    What does "white earth" have to do with native americans in North Dakota and Minnesota?

    Reply:

    Yes — “White Earth” is a very specific Native American reference in Minnesota, and it has an interesting connection to North Dakota as well. 

    The White Earth Reservation is in northwestern Minnesota, roughly 65–70 miles east of Fargo. It is the home of the White Earth Nation, an Ojibwe (Anishinaabe) nation. The reservation encompasses all of Mahnomen County and portions of Becker and Clearwater Counties.

    The name is quite literal. “White Earth” refers to a layer of white clay beneath the soil, particularly around White Earth Village. The Ojibwe name is Gaa-waabaabiganikaag, translated roughly as “the place with an abundance of white clay."

    But here's where the North Dakota connection gets particularly interesting.

    The White Earth Reservation wasn't originally the homeland of the people who ended up there

    In 1867, the U.S. government established the White Earth Reservation through a treaty with the Mississippi Band of Chippewa (Ojibwe). The government's intention was essentially to consolidate numerous Ojibwe communities from Minnesota onto one reservation.

      

    That included Ojibwe people from the Red River Valley and what is now North Dakota, including the Pembina Band.

    And this is where Turtle Mountain enters the story.

    The Chippewa/Ojibwe had been moving and hunting across a huge territory encompassing northern Minnesota, North Dakota and Manitoba. As American settlement pushed westward, the government tried to move the Turtle Mountain Chippewa of North Dakota to White Earth, Minnesota. Some people did move there, but Little Shell III and others resisted and remained in the Turtle Mountains.

    So you get a fascinating historical chain:

    Ojibwe/Anishinaabe → Minnesota & Red River Valley → Pembina/Turtle Mountain → pressure to relocate → White Earth Reservation

    In fact, the population that eventually assembled at White Earth was remarkably diverse. A 1920 census showed people there from the Mississippi Band, Mille Lacs, Pillager, Pembina, and Fond du Lac bands. 

    And there's an even deeper connection

    This is why “White Earth” can show up in discussions of Native Americans in both Minnesota and North Dakota without necessarily referring to the same place.

    North Dakota's Turtle Mountain Band of Chippewa Indians and Minnesota's White Earth Band are both part of the larger historical story of the Ojibwe expansion westward and the subsequent U.S. effort to confine and consolidate Native peoples onto reservations.

    And the geography is remarkable: White Earth is only about 68 miles east of Fargo, while Turtle Mountain is farther northwest in North Dakota near the Canadian border. 

    So if you encountered “White Earth” in something you're reading about Native Americans in North Dakota/Minnesota, it probably isn't just a geographical name. It may be referring to the White Earth Ojibwe Nation, the 1867 reservation, or the forced/consolidated movement of Ojibwe bands—including people from the Pembina/Red River region—onto that reservation.

    If you'd like, I can also explain the fascinating difference between the Ojibwe/Chippewa, the Dakota, the Pembina Band, the Turtle Mountain Band, and the Métis in this particular North Dakota–Minnesota region. That's where the history gets really interesting.  

     Query:

    That is exactly what I was looking for. Thank you. But in addition, now having read that, it reminds me of the porcelain or china or pottery heritage in North Dakota and something the University of North Dakota has a research interest. 

    Reply:

    Ah — yes! You are remembering something real, and I think I can see why your mind connected it to White Earth. There are actually two overlapping pottery stories in the Upper Midwest, and the University of North Dakota sits right in the middle of one of them.

    1. UND has a remarkable ceramics history of its own

    The University of North Dakota established its ceramics program in 1910 under Margaret Kelly Cable. Cable and her students deliberately used native North Dakota clays and prairie-derived designs to create what became known as UND Pottery, Cable Pottery, or School of Mines Pottery. UND now has a digital collection of more than 900 pieces.

    And this is the part that may be triggering your memory:

    Cable incorporated Native American motifs into the pottery. UND describes her designs as drawing on prairie and agricultural subjects—prairie roses, coneflowers, wheat, birds and flickertails—as well as American Indian and Western motifs.

    There are even pieces in the UND collection labeled “Sioux Indian Head” and “UND Sioux Ceramic Pendants.”

    2. But there is a much older Native pottery tradition

    And this is where your connection to White Earth/Minnesota/North Dakota becomes especially interesting.

    Indigenous pottery in this region predates European contact by thousands of years. Archaeological evidence shows Woodland peoples making pottery in what is now North Dakota roughly 2,500 years ago, and the tradition continued among peoples including the Mandan and Hidatsa.

    The Mandan pottery tradition in particular is extraordinarily sophisticated. Archaeologists have identified distinct ceramic traditions such as Riggs, Fort Yates, Stanton, and Sanger wares, including transitional forms that suggest potters were experimenting with vessel construction and decoration.

    Indigenous pottery
    → thousands of years old
    → Woodland peoples → Plains peoples → Mandan/Hidatsa and others
    → functional vessels, cooking, storage, ceremonial uses

    UND/Cable pottery
    → beginning around 1910
    → European-American Arts & Crafts movement
    → North Dakota native clays
    → prairie and Native motifs
    → eventually a nationally recognized art-pottery tradition

    And now I see why you mentioned "White Earth"

    There is a fascinating third piece.

    The Upper Midwest is unusually rich in clay deposits, and Indigenous peoples had long exploited that resource. In fact, a recent account of Dakota pottery notes that ceramics had deep roots in Minnesota and that the abundance of clay was reflected in Dakota place names associated with earth and clay. 

    And the name White Earth itself—Gaa-waabaabiganikaag, roughly "the place where there is an abundance of white clay"—is therefore not an accidental name. It reflects the physical geology of the Ojibwe homeland.

    So your intuition was excellent:

    White Earth → clay → Indigenous use of clay → Native pottery → North Dakota/Minnesota archaeological ceramics → UND's later exploitation of North Dakota clays → Cable pottery.

    That's a much more interesting continuum than I initially realized when I answered your White Earth question.

    And there is one more rabbit hole here that I suspect may be exactly what you were remembering: UND actually did scientific research on North Dakota clays and their suitability for ceramics, not merely artistic pottery. A North Dakota Geological Survey report specifically discusses ceramic research at UND and the state's abundant clay and shale resources.

    If you want, I can dig into that scientific/archaeological side—particularly what UND discovered about the different North Dakota clays, and whether any of them connect directly to White Earth/Ojibwe pottery traditions. That could be a very interesting story. 

    Which then led to this:

    Query:

    So, now back to something you brought up earlier. What is the fascinating difference between the Ojibwe/Chippewa, the Dakota, the Pembina Band, the Turtle Mountain Band, and the Métis in this particular North Dakota–Minnesota region.

    Reply:

    Yes. And once you put these groups side by side, the history of the Red River Valley becomes much clearer. The biggest trap is thinking that “Native American” was one political or cultural category. It wasn't—and neither were “Chippewa,” “Dakota,” or “Métis.”

    The simplest way to see it is this:

    Ojibwe/Chippewa and Dakota are different peoples. Pembina is an Ojibwe band. Turtle Mountain is a modern Ojibwe nation whose history became deeply Métis. Métis are a distinct people whose culture emerged from Indigenous-European intermarriage and the fur-trade world.

    And all of this happened in a remarkably fluid world that predated the U.S.-Canada border.


    1. Ojibwe / Anishinaabe / Chippewa

    First, Ojibwe and Chippewa are the same people. "Anishinaabe" is the people's own broader name; "Ojibwe" is commonly used today, while "Chippewa" became the common American governmental term. 

    Their historical homeland was primarily the Great Lakes and upper Midwest. They moved progressively westward during the 17th–19th centuries.

    And this is the important part for your question:

    Some Ojibwe moved onto the Plains.

    By the late 1700s, Ojibwe bands had moved into the Red River, Assiniboine and Souris River country, acquiring horses and firearms and participating in the buffalo economy. North Dakota's historical account describes this transition as the Ojibwe becoming, in effect, Plains Indians.

    So the stereotypical picture—

    Ojibwe = forest/lakes/Minnesota

    —is true historically, but incomplete.

    There were also Plains Ojibwe.

    And that is the key to everything that follows.


    2. The Pembina Band

    The Pembina Band was not a different "tribe" from the Ojibwe.

    It was an Ojibwe band that became established around Pembina and the Red River Valley.

    Think of "Pembina Band" somewhat like saying:

    the Ojibwe people living in this particular region and organized around this particular community.

    Permanent Ojibwe settlement at Pembina developed around 1800–1805. That community became the nucleus of what would eventually be called the Pembina or Turtle Mountain Band.

    And Pembina was an extraordinary place.

    The Red River Valley was essentially a crossroads:

    Ojibwe + Cree + Assiniboine + French Canadians + British/Scottish fur traders

    all interacting.

    The Red River itself became an enormous transportation corridor.

    And then comes one of the great inventions of the region:

    The Red River cart.

    The Ojibwe and Métis became extraordinarily adept at using these huge two-wheeled carts to transport buffalo meat, hides and other goods across the prairie. North Dakota historical sources credit the Chippewa with the invention, while Turtle Mountain's own history emphasizes the Métis development and use of the technology.

    That apparent contradiction actually tells you something important:

    Ojibwe and Métis culture were becoming intertwined.


    3. The Métis

    This is where things get really fascinating.

    The Métis weren't simply "mixed-race Indians."

    They became a distinct Indigenous people and culture, particularly in the Red River Valley.

    They developed out of relationships among Indigenous peoples—especially Cree and Ojibwe—and French-Canadian and other European fur traders and settlers.

    They developed their own:

    • communities
    • economic system
    • political identity
    • hunting culture
    • clothing
    • music
    • Catholic traditions
    • transportation system
    • and eventually their own language, Michif

    The result was something neither simply European nor simply Ojibwe.

    And the buffalo hunt was central.

    A Red River Valley Métis family could be simultaneously:

    Catholic + French-speaking + Indigenous + buffalo hunter + fur trader + Red River cart owner.

    That combination is difficult to fit into modern racial categories.

    The Turtle Mountain Band itself describes its present heritage as a unique blending of Ojibwe and Métis culture, with Ojibwe, Cree and French influences and Michif among its historical languages. 

    4. And then there's Turtle Mountain

    Here's the part I think you will particularly enjoy.

    The Turtle Mountain Band of Chippewa isn't simply an Ojibwe group that happened to live in North Dakota.

    It is essentially the product of the extraordinary Red River/Pembina frontier we have just described.

    An Ojibwe community established itself around Pembina.

    Some moved south and west toward the Turtle Mountains.

    They hunted buffalo.

    They traded.

    They intermarried.

    They interacted with Cree and Métis.

    And over generations a distinctive Plains Ojibwe–Métis culture emerged.

    The Turtle Mountains consequently became a sort of cultural island.

    Today the Turtle Mountain Band officially describes itself as an Ojibwe/Anishinaabe nation with a strong Ojibwe and Métis heritage. Its reservation is in Rolette County, near the Canadian border, and its capital is Belcourt.

    And here's a wonderful detail:

    The reservation wasn't established until 1882.

    So the people and culture existed before the reservation.

    The reservation was an American governmental response to a preexisting people—not the creation of the people themselves. 

    5. Now introduce the Dakota

    This is where we need to be very careful.

    Dakota and Ojibwe are entirely different peoples.

    They belong to different linguistic families:


    OjibweDakota
    Larger linguistic familyAlgonquianSiouan
    LanguageOjibwemowinDakota/Lakota
    Traditional heartlandGreat Lakes/Upper MidwestUpper Mississippi/Great Plains
    RelationshipAnishinaabe peopleOceti Sakowin/Dakota people

    And they were not always friendly neighbors.

    In fact, there was a long history of warfare between the Ojibwe and Dakota.

    One of the great historical ironies is that the Ojibwe's westward expansion ultimately brought them into direct competition with the Dakota for territory, particularly around northern Minnesota.

    But the Red River Valley complicated things enormously because Cree, Ojibwe, Dakota, Assiniboine and Métis worlds overlapped.


    6. Then the Americans arrive with a map

    This is where everything changes.

    The people of the Red River Valley had lived in a world where:

    Minnesota ↔ Dakota Territory ↔ Manitoba

    were not hard cultural boundaries.

    Then the United States and Britain/Canada created a political boundary.

    Suddenly the 49th parallel became an international border.

    But Indigenous families didn't suddenly stop being related because a line had been drawn on a map.

    The Turtle Mountain Band's own historical account makes this point beautifully: the establishment of the international boundary—the "Medicine Line"—displaced Indigenous peoples who had traditionally moved across the region. 

    And then came American land policy.

    Treaties.

    Reservations.

    Allotment.

    Railroads.

    Settlers.

    The destruction of the buffalo economy.

    The Dawes Act.

    And the government began trying to force fluid peoples into fixed administrative categories.

    7. Which brings us back to White Earth

    Now your original question makes much more sense.

    White Earth was not originally the ancestral homeland of a single White Earth "tribe."

    It was created in 1867 as a reservation intended to consolidate Ojibwe people from different bands.

    And look at who eventually showed up there.

    The 1920 census recorded:

    • 4,856 from the Mississippi Band
    • 1,308 Mille Lacs
    • 1,218 Pillager
    • 472 Pembina
    • 113 Fond du Lac

    That's an extraordinary mixture.

    And the Pembina people from the Red River Valley began moving into White Earth after 1873.

    So you have this remarkable geographic movement:

    Great Lakes Ojibwe

    Minnesota Ojibwe

    Plains Ojibwe

    Pembina / Red River Ojibwe

    Turtle Mountain

    AND

    Pembina → White Earth

    while simultaneously:

    Ojibwe + Cree + French Canadian → Métis culture.

    And here's the really beautiful historical picture

    If you stood around Pembina in 1820, you would not necessarily have been able to look at a person and say:

    "That's an Indian."

    or

    "That's a Métis."

    or

    "That's French."

    The world was much more complicated.

    A family might have Ojibwe ancestry, Cree ancestry and French-Canadian ancestry, speak several languages, participate in the Catholic Church, hunt buffalo, own Red River carts, trade with the Hudson's Bay Company, and have relatives on both sides of what would eventually become the international boundary.

    And that is precisely why Turtle Mountain is so interesting.

    It preserves, in institutional form, a piece of that old Red River world.

    The North Dakota Indian Affairs Commission actually describes Turtle Mountain as a place where a distinctive culture developed through the blending of Ojibwe and Métis traditions.

    One final distinction that is extremely important

    Don't think of this as:

    Ojibwe → Pembina → Métis → Turtle Mountain

    as though these were successive tribes.

    It's more like:

    OJIBWE

    ↙︎ ↓ ↘︎

    Minnesota bands | Pembina/Red River bands | Plains Ojibwe

     

    Turtle Mountains

    And alongside and interwoven with the Red River Ojibwe:

    Cree + Ojibwe + French Canadian/European → MÉTIS

    while the Dakota were a separate Indigenous people occupying and contesting much of the neighboring territory.

    That distinction—tribe vs. band vs. nation vs. ethnocultural people vs. reservation—is the key that unlocks this whole North Dakota/Minnesota history.

    And I suspect this is also why your earlier UND pottery question may turn out to have an even deeper connection than we initially thought. The Red River Valley wasn't merely a geographic corridor—it was a cultural meeting place, and North Dakota's later fascination with "native" materials, imagery and history grew out of that extraordinarily complicated landscape.

    ******************************
    Absolutely Fascinating

    On so many levels.

    I grew up hearing all these names and name places.  

    Had it not been for the blog, I probably never would have gone down this rabbit hole.