Showing posts with label ThreeForks_Benches. Show all posts
Showing posts with label ThreeForks_Benches. Show all posts

Friday, November 26, 2021

Odds And Ends Around The Bakken -- November 26, 2021

Nine Point takes this well off line:

  • 24546, IA/485, Nine Point Energy/Triangle Petroleum, Dwyer 150-101-35-26-1H, Rawson, t5/13; cum 42K 8/13; cum 184K 7/21; goes off line 7/21; neighboring wells on same pad are also being taken off line: #26231 and #26230;

Is EOG taking this well off line?

  • 21406, 1,355, EOG, Liberty 25-0107H, Parshall, t4/13; cum 469K 10/20; cum 493K 9/21; recent production:
PoolDateDaysBBLS OilRunsBBLS WaterMCF ProdMCF SoldVent/Flare
BAKKEN9-202111807722840171015890
BAKKEN8-202131300030002296495345770
BAKKEN7-202121173616791653293126820
BAKKEN6-202128113511681127234420040
BAKKEN5-202131167116651379333229560

This is a lousy well. Does CLR have something in mind for this well?

  • 24935, 216, CLR, Tangsrud 7-1H3, Hayland, t10/13; cum 48K 9/19; cum 51K 9/21;
PoolDateDaysBBLS OilRunsBBLS WaterMCF ProdMCF SoldVent/Flare
BAKKEN9-2021715419713104193324
BAKKEN8-2021214583905588996617
BAKKEN7-20211283841970
BAKKEN6-20211480114792971341
BAKKEN5-202125153126345452559
BAKKEN4-20213013712437384301

Coming off line for a reason? The well:

  • 24981, 2,559, BR, CCU Four Aces 44-21TFH, Corral Creek, t11/13; cum 235K 9/19; cum 260K 92/1; 
PoolDateDaysBBLS OilRunsBBLS WaterMCF ProdMCF SoldVent/Flare
BAKKEN9-202129695214957123
BAKKEN8-20213881566295940
BAKKEN7-20213116711646130916101242359
BAKKEN6-20213016751688132918081607192
BAKKEN5-20213114251393171214901348136

Friday, August 20, 2021

Update: The Lower Three Forks -- August 20, 2021

January, 2021: the lower Three Forks formation (third bench), Bakken-Three Forks petroleum system, overview of development history and future potential; Timothy O. Nehsheim, GeoNews, DMR, North Dakota, link to source article

It appears there is some movement toward 1st bench / 2nd bench morphing into upper Three Forks, and 3rd bench morphing into lower Three Forks.

Future potential:

  • sub-60% water-cut areas:
    • 710,000 acres
    • 550 "standard" 1280-acre drilling units
    • three horizontal wells per spacing unit = over 1,600 horizontal lower Three Forks wells (~ 3rd bench wells)
  • sub-70% water-cut area
    • 1,600,000 acres
    • more than double that of just the sub-60% water-cut areas
    • potential: several thousand wells

Sunday, April 4, 2021

Flashback: Bakken Update -- EOG, Whiting Well Results Prove Parshall Field More Productive Than The Sanish -- Michael Filloon -- July 14, 2013

It's hard to believe this SeekingAlpha article by Michael Filloon is still available on the internet. 

Archived.

The article begins:

There are no two better fields in the Williston Basin for middle Bakken results than Parshall and Sanish. Parshall and Sanish fields are the focal point of EOG Resources' (NYSE:EOG) and Whiting's (NYSE:WLL) Bakken plays. EOG and Whiting were some of the earliest operators; this kept acreage costs down but also provided its pick of the best leaseholds. These two fields have seen more development than any other area of the Bakken. All have very good results, but both have a different history. Geology is not much different, except the depth of the middle Bakken and Sanish Sands.

The Three Forks is also shallower than around the Nesson Anticline. Shale thickness seems consistent in both the middle Bakken and Three Forks. The isopach below shows Bakken thickness of over 120 feet. Keep in mind thicker shale does not necessarily mean better EURs; it could provide a larger number of locations. This is evident in the picture [at the article].

Whiting believes it can maintain seven locations per mile in the Sanish Field. The lower Bakken shale is extremely thick in both the Sanish and Parshall fields. It will maintain only three in the upper Three Forks. The Hidden Bench prospect is very interesting as it plans to drill eight locations in the middle Bakken, but this probably has to do with the Bakken Silt being thicker in this area. The upper Three Forks could be a big deal in this leasehold as it plans seven locations. It is twice as thick as in Mountrail County. The Pronghorn Sands may have something to do with this as well, but that is a guess on my part. Obviously, the Bakken is the focus in both Parshall and Sanish. 

The Three Forks is comprised of two to four layers or benches of shale. The Three Forks has seen less development than the middle Bakken. EURs of the Three Forks in Mountrail County have lagged other areas. Northeast McKenzie County's Three Forks' locations have been the best in play, but there have been excellent Pronghorn Sands results in Billings and Stark counties. As seen above, the first bench of the Three Forks is somewhat thin compared to McKenzie County. 

Much more at the linked article, including some incredible graphics. 

Meanwhile, dovetailing with this article, were comments sent to me by a reader about the same time I was re-reading the Filloon article above:

In the hydrocarbon world, your comments on the significance of 'stacked pay' are pretty much right on. 
Some other time, I may delve a bit into the 'stuff' that I have learned in this subject, with the Powder River Basin providing much of the raw data, operators' approach, economical viability ... or lack thereof. 
Pretty interesting topic that is much more complex than the superficial terms being bandied about might indicate.

Lastly, for today, you may find it instructive to track the geologist's reports on these Three Forks second bench wells, especially as the top of the TF 2B is reached. 
If the top of the next lower formation is noted, all the better as you will be able to identify the thickness of the second bench in that location. 
(Note, while the KOP - Kick Off Point - for the lateral will be [well] above the top of the next lower formation, often operators will deliberately drill deeper to get precise geological information. 
They will then cement in this exploratory 'hole' and resume the curve/lateral drilling). 
The production  numbers that both MRO and CLR are showing from these second bench wells are astonishing. 
I am certain the other Bakken operators are monitoring these developments very closely.

In reply:

  • yes, periodically, I do track the thickness of the various Three Forks benches;
  • yes, I have often seen the operators drill lower than the target, then cement that in, come back up and continue with the lateral through the planned target; and,
  • yes, the production numbers are astonishing. CLR's acreage is across most of the Bakken so their wells may vary significantly; MRO seems to be concentrated in a much smaller geographic area that is either an incredibly good area, or they have really optimized their completion strategies, or perhaps a bit of both.

Saturday, September 26, 2020

The XTO Bobcat Federal Wells, Bear Creek

The Bobcat Federal wells are tracked here

 The wells:

  • 34356, 1,305, XTO, Bobcat Federal 14X-35A, Bear Creek, t6/19; cum 470K 6/20; F; for early production: link here
  • 34358, 30 (no typo), XTO, Bobcat Federal 14X-35EXH, Bear Creek, 60 stages, 12.0 million lbs, t5/19; cum 413K 6/20; for early production: link here;

Look at those numbers.

Drilled/completed/tested in May / June of 2019.

A year later: almost 500 million bbls. 

It should be noted that these wells are "extended" long laterals -- three sections long -- which, explains, to some extent, the large amount of water, but, still, a huge amount of water. 

From a reader:

When you first posted the numbers of the XTO wells on August 22, I was struck by several numbers, especially the amount of frac water pumped (830,000 bbls and 585,000 barrels) as well as the exceptionally  long 'flowback/produced water' time frame and amounts recovered.
While I will immediately  follow with a somewhat clumsy, detailed explanation of what XTO has accomplished with these two completions, suffice to say that XTO has developed a way to pump VAST amounts of high pressure fluid underground in a CONTROLLED fashion.

Furthermore, the chemistry of these new fluids/water allows extended underground retention without damaging the formation.  
(In years past, fluid imbibing (softening) of the rock and/or leaving a production-inhibiting coating/skin necessitated a relatively quick removal of the frac fluid in the weeks immediately  following the fracturing). 
This extended period - several months - of maintaining the induced water underground enables the higher hydraulic pressure to push more oil into the wellbore.

Will follow up with explanation of the significance of effectively pumping ~35 million gallons underground.

Seven wells on that pad:

  • 34355, 176, XTO, Bobcat Federal 14X-35E2, Bear Creek, t4/19; cum 169K 7/20;
  • 34356, above,
  • 34357, 10 (no typo), XTO, Bobcat Federal 14X-35AXB, Bear Creek, t5/19; cum 318K 7/20;
  • 34358, above,
  • 34559, 83, XTO, Bobcat Federal 11X-2F2-S, Bear Creek, t5/19; cum 108K 7/20; 20 stages; 4 million lbs; Three Forks 2;
  • 34359, 456, XTO, Bobcat Federal 11X-2A-S, Bear Creek, t4/19; cum 84K 7/20; middle Bakken; 20 stages; 6 million lbs proppant;
  • 34360, 83, XTO, Bobcat Federal 11X-2E-S, Bear Creek, t5/19; cum 45K 7/20; Three Forks, 20 stages, 4 million lbs;
*******************************************
Movie Night

Sunset Boulevard.

Saturday, March 21, 2020

Middle Bakken: Great; First Bench: Better; Second Bench: Best -- March 21, 2020

These three wells were drilled from the same pad by the same company: the deepest well, a Three Forks 2nd bench well, about two months older; used significantly less proppant (14 million lbs vs 21 million lbs) and has produced twice the amount of oil as the middle Bakken well; and almost 60% more than the Three Forks first bench well.

Months of production/BOE cumulative
  • 35108, Three Forks first bench: about 7.75 months; 297,332 boe; best month: 36,639 bo
  • 35080, middle Bakken: exactly 7 months; 243,608 boe; best month: 40,993 bo;
  • 35081, Three Forks, second bench, 9.5 months; 464,916 boe; best month: 69,314 bo;
Disclaimer: in long notes like these, there will be content and typographical errors. If this is important to you, go to the source. 

These three three-lateral Carson Peak wells on this pad swing north to capture most of section 26, and then swing south through section 35, and then terminate near the south line of section 2. 

These are the three Carson Peak wells. Note: the typical length of a "standard" Bakken well is 19,000 - 21,000 (maybe, 22,000) feet. The Morris wells, for example that swing north from this pad measure about 19,000 feet MD.

Note the depths on these wells. The vertical depths (TVDs) vary by less than 40 - 100 feet between middle Bakken wells and Three Forks wells in general across the Bakken. The intervening shale seams are 10 - 30 feet thick; the targeted seams are about 40 feet thick.

Depths:
  • 35080, 2,076, CLR, Carson Peak 7-35H, middle Bakken, Oakdale, t6/19; cum 207K; TD: 25,248 feet
  • 35108, 1,824, CLR, Carson Peak 6-35H1, Three Forks 1st bench, Oakdale, t5/19; cum 252K; TD: 26,152 feet
  • 35081, 3,556, CLR, Carson Peak 6-35H2, Three Forks 2nd bench, Oakdale, t5/19; cum 398K; TD: 25,320 feet;
Frack data:
  • 35080, middle Bakken: 53 stages; 20.62 million lbs
  • 35018, Three Forks, 1st bench: 54 stages; 20.67 million lbs;
  • 35081, Three Forks, 2nd bench: 52 stages; 14.21 million lbs;
***************************************** 
Production Profile Of Selected Wells

The wells:
  • 35081
    • Note: Three Forks second bench
    • Note: the relatively small amount of water returned compared to the huge amount of oil returned.
    • Note: 44K over 15 days extrapolates to 88K over one 30-day month.
    • Frack: 52 stages; 14.2 million lbs
    • Notes from the file report below the production profile:
PoolDateDaysBBLS OilRunsBBLS WaterMCF ProdMCF SoldVent/Flare
BAKKEN1-2020312303223092778824143228471115
BAKKEN12-2019312605926081973228697268721531
BAKKEN11-20193027355273291017928958243464290
BAKKEN10-201931306143058911237269021459611993
BAKKEN9-20193028746287691116729551232835952
BAKKEN8-20193140595406271596240748337636632
BAKKEN7-20193155133551352245954834473777043
BAKKEN6-201930506865083822437461913490010757
BAKKEN5-20193169314693743308774737660747832
BAKKEN4-20191544172437551728147768419335379
BAKKEN3-20190000000
BAKKEN2-20190000000
BAKKEN1-20195189618963138142401424

From the file report:
  • target: Three Forks, second bench
  • Oakdale/Rocket play 
  • spud: September 9, 2018
  • TD: October 17, 2018
  • TD: a very deep, 25,320 feet (typical Bakken wells, 19,000 to 22,000 feet)
  • almost a true three section lateral; two full sections and 75% or so of the first section where the well is sited;
  • drilling operations began on September 9, 2018; H&P 535;
  • geological services began September 11, 2018, at 9,060 feet;
  • vertical operations completed with one planned trip and another for the curve assembly
  • KOP: 10,929';
  • curve drilled with a single drilling assembly; kicked off late on the morning of September 12, 2018,
    • note about the Bakken shale collapse issues in this region - previously posted; shallow entrance/exit angle; no collapse issues;
  • drilled out of the shoe on October 12, 2018
  • lateral: completed in three runs;
  • gas readings varied widely; 
    • gas buster brought on line at 12,056' MD after gas readings spiked to nearly 3,000 units
    • again, just after after 15,500' MD, readings often exceeded 3,000 units
    • at 21,500' MD, gas began building again; 3,500 - 4,000 units; faded to around 2,500 - 3,000 units through the last 1,300'  of the well;
  • depths:
    • upper Bakken shale: 11,224' TVD
    • middle Bakken member: 11,238' TVD (forty feet seam)
    • lower Bakken member: 11,278' TVD
    • Three Forks formation top: 11,295' TVD (first bench -- 43 feet seam)
    • internal 1 shale top of the Three Forks: 11,338' TVD (15 feet of shale)
    • Three Forks second bench: 11,353' 
  • ideal target: 15.5' thick; began 6.5' below the internal 1 shale base, extended 22' below the same reference point;
Based on limited data, just as the CDC bases coronavirus case fatality rates on limited data, suggests the second bench Three Forks is going to be twice as good as the middle Bakken, and upwards of 60% better than the first bench.

Tuesday, February 12, 2019

XTO Soon To Frack The Bobcat Federal Wells In Bear Creek -- February 12, 2019

The Bobcat Federal Wells
 
The parent well, link here, with full produciton:
  • 18294, 341, XTO, Werre Trust 44X-34H, Bear Creek, t3/10; cum 582K 5/20; cum 661K 2/23;
The wells:
  • 34360, 83, XTO, Bobcat Federal 11X-2E-S, Bear Creek, t5/19; cum 94K 4/21; cum 113K 10/21;
  • 34359, 456, XTO, Bobcat Federal 11X-2A-S, Bear Creek, t5/19; cum 137K 4/21; cum 154K 10/21;
  • 34358, 30 (sic), XTO, Bobcat Federal 14X-35EXH, Bear Creek, t5/19; cum 413K 6/20; cum 567K 5/21; cum 611K 10/21;
  • 34357, 10, XTO, Bobcat Federal 14X-35AXB, Bear Creek, t5/19; cum 513K 4/21; cum 596K 10/21;
  • 34356, 1,305, XTO, Bobcat Federal 14X-35A, Bear Creek, t6/19; cum 470K 6/20; cum 631K 5/21; 672K 10/21;
  • 34355, 176, XTO, Bobcat Federal 14X-35E2, Bear Creek, t4/19; cum 253K 4/21; cum 285K 10/21;
Production Profiles:
  • 34356:
PoolDateDaysBBLS OilRunsBBLS WaterMCF ProdMCF SoldVent/Flare
BAKKEN2-20212710856108231189227026176719302
BAKKEN1-202131153391525616935311721955211563
BAKKEN12-20202089978954119811521988866304
BAKKEN11-202021112511139712288329411684616033
BAKKEN10-20202916185165421762132139244747574
BAKKEN9-20203018789185172042642468351227243
BAKKEN8-20203122212222292278953821509712763
BAKKEN7-20203123716236742256549581481521360
BAKKEN6-2020302231322329205904044539882506
BAKKEN5-20203133876336392638158630572411308
BAKKEN4-2020151548615579143932270422031636
BAKKEN3-20203123359235192174232622325620
BAKKEN2-20202927465276592706237700357491880
BAKKEN1-2020313091630700292184308042087902
BAKKEN12-2019313642736767331624911648798235
BAKKEN11-20193037908381383720051225461984924
BAKKEN10-2019313975440181425655341252750471
BAKKEN9-20193047937478424147462276620890
BAKKEN8-20193161872619987049191824904621166
BAKKEN7-201931695507007561117923252691165371
BAKKEN6-201913220112064115944333081924314043

Updates

September 26, 2020: update here with comment from reader.

September 2, 2019: This is one well in in the immediate area that has just returned to production:

  • 18112, 442, XTO, Porcupine Ridge 14-35H, Bear Creek, t4/10; cum 269K 3/20; 285K 10/21;
PoolDateDaysBBLS OilRunsBBLS WaterMCF ProdMCF SoldVent/Flare
BAKKEN6-201930214519548140326114491627
BAKKEN5-2019314159416312431632223743763
BAKKEN4-2019710078244747153001493
BAKKEN3-20190000000
BAKKEN2-20190000000
BAKKEN1-20190000000
BAKKEN12-20180000000
BAKKEN11-20180000000
BAKKEN10-20180000000
BAKKEN9-20180000000
BAKKEN8-20180000000
BAKKEN7-2018291222136186519001309414
BAKKEN6-20183012741371100320031419399

June 19, 2019: it was noted that some wells in the immediate area are starting to come back on line suggesting that the Bobcat Federal wells have been completed? Nothing at FracFocus yet, so maybe not, but we'll keep watching.

This is one well in in the immediate area that has just returned to production:
  • 18112, 442, XTO, Porcupine Ridge 14-35H, Bear Creek, t4/10; cum 269K 3/20;
Recent production:
PoolDateDaysBBLS OilRunsBBLS WaterMCF ProdMCF SoldVent/Flare
BAKKEN4-2019710078244747153001493
BAKKEN3-20190000000
BAKKEN2-20190000000
BAKKEN1-20190000000
BAKKEN12-20180000000
BAKKEN11-20180000000
BAKKEN10-20180000000
BAKKEN9-20180000000
BAKKEN8-20180000000
BAKKEN7-2018291247138686519251309439
BAKKEN6-20183012951392100320321419428
BAKKEN5-20183014551394113422611520556

If that 1,007 bbls over 7 days can be extrapolated over 30 days, it's going to be quite a well. 

Original Post 

The XTO Bobcat Federal wells are in the process of being fracked (or will soon be fracked):
  • 34355, 176, XTO, Bobcat Federal 14X-35AXB, Bear Creek;  33-025-03404, t4/19; cum 169K 7/20;
  • 34356, 1,305, XTO, Bobcat Federal 14X-35A, Bear Creek;  33-025-03405, t6/19; cum 470K 6/20; F; see this post;
  • 34357, 10 (no typo), XTO, Bobcat Federal ...;  33-025-03406, t5/19; cum 180K 3/20;
  • 34358, 30 (no typo), XTO, Bobcat Federal 14X-35EXH, Bear Creek,  33-025-03407, 60 stages; 12.0 million lbs; t5/19; cum 413K 6/20; see this post;
  • 34559, 83 (no typo), XTO, Bobcat Federal 11X-2F2-S; Three Forks second bench;   33-025-03444, t5/19; cum 46K 9/19; 20 stages; 6 million lbs;
  • 34359, 456, XTO, Bobcat Federal 11X-2A-S;  33-025-03408, t5/19; cum 84K 7/20; middle Bakken; 20 stages; 6 million lbs proppants;
  • 34360, 83, XTO, Bobcat Federal 11X-2E-S, Bear Creek, t5/19; cum 45K 7/20; Three Forks, 20 stages, 4 million lbs;
All neighboring wells have been taken off line-- they have been off-line for about six months.

The graphic:



Sunday, December 9, 2018

Preliminary Study Regarding The Middle And Lower Benches Of The Three Forks -- Geo News -- December 9, 2018

This was posted as an update to an earlier post but it is too important to be lost, so I am reposting it:
Don sent me a link to an article in the January, 2018, issue of Geo News. It should download as a pdf on your desktop:
From that article:
There is currently limited geological information available regarding the petroleum geology and economic importance of the middle to lower Three Forks.
Resource assessments of the Three Forks Formation have ranged from approximately 2 to 4 billion barrels of recoverable oil, but these assessments have been limited to the upper Three Forks (Nordeng and Helms, 2010; Gaswirth et al., 2013).
This article reports the preliminary findings of a recently initiated study on the origin and distribution of oil saturations within the middle Three Forks. It also reviews the present production footprint of 2nd bench horizontal oil wells and projects their potential future distribution.
In addition, I am examining oil saturations and hydrocarbon production in the lower Three Forks (3rd and 4th benches).
The author is Timothy O. Nesheim.

As noted, this article is a "work in progress." Unless I missed it, the author did not provide estimated reserves in the middle or lower benches of the Three Forks.

Don suggests it is likely that this paper is part of the ongoing USGS survey of the Bakken/Three Forks.
******************************************
See How Many Faces You Recognize

Sun Records Medley

Putting The Bakken Into Perspective -- December 9, 2018

Updates

Later, 10:07 a.m. CT: Don sent me a link to an article in the January, 2018, issue of Geo News. It should download as a pdf on your desktop:
From that article:
There is currently limited geological information available regarding the petroleum geology and economic importance of the middle to lower Three Forks.
Resource assessments of the Three Forks Formation have ranged from approximately 2 to 4 billion barrels of recoverable oil, but these assessments have been limited to the upper Three Forks (Nordeng and Helms, 2010; Gaswirth et al., 2013).
This article reports the preliminary findings of a recently initiated study on the origin and distribution of oil saturations within the middle Three Forks. It also reviews the present production footprint of 2nd bench horizontal oil wells and projects their potential future distribution.
In addition, I am examining oil saturations and hydrocarbon production in the lower Three Forks (3rd and 4th benches).
The author is Timothy O. Nesheim.

As noted, this article is a "work in progress." Unless I missed it, the author did not provide estimated reserves in the middle or lower benches of the Three Forks.

Don suggests it is likely that this paper is part of the ongoing USGS survey of the Bakken/Three Forks.

Original Post

At one million bopd, the Bakken produces (365 million bbls x 3 years =) one billion bbls every three years. Unfettered, of course, the Bakken could produce more than 2 million bopd, or one billion bbls every year and a half.

So what?

At the sidebar at the right, there is a long list with "Other Formations." Here is the link to "Norway," for example.

And from that page, the most recent post:
December 8, 2018: from Equinor's website, this date -- Johan Sverdrup—the North Sea giant Johan Sverdrup is one of the five largest oil fields on the Norwegian continental shelf.

With expected resources of between 2.1—3.1 billion barrels of oil equivalents, it will also be one of the most important industrial projects in Norway in the next 50 years. The development and operation of this enormous field will generate revenue and provide jobs for coming generations.
My hunch is that the next USGS survey of the Bakken/Three Forks will be the equivalent of adding several such fields to the Williston Basin. It is unlikely the next survey will include Three Forks B2 and B3 because so few wells have been drilled into the lower Three Forks. 

Tuesday, September 25, 2018

Another Nice Example Of The Life-Cycle Of A Bakken Well -- Slawson's Jughead #17864 -- September 25, 2018

The well:
  • 17864, 1,255, Slawson, Jughead 1-26H, Big Bend, t6/10; cum 315K 8/17; 
Production after 8/17:
BAKKEN4-20183044803990326340582807627
BAKKEN3-20182635523885355726831802000
BAKKEN2-201828466245985554354102896
BAKKEN1-2018255109486510564387603213
BAKKEN12-20171212821532869136511636
BAKKEN11-2017303149300020092920235578
BAKKEN10-20173133133605312928231857458
BAKKEN9-20173022101572426719541436127


Production prior to 8/16, just before coming off-line for about year; not re-fracked:
BAKKEN8-2016101115129426410289780
BAKKEN7-20162824442353719204119010
BAKKEN6-20163059779220160140942
BAKKEN5-20163146922510651232136
BAKKEN4-20163044749511948731225
BAKKEN3-2016315075581084102550
BAKKEN2-201629358227693371920

Neighboring well was fracked/completed/tested: 2/17 --; note the jump in production a year later, 8/18 --
  • 30235, 439, Slawson, Jugard Federal 5-26-35TFH, t2/17; cum 248K 8/18
PoolDateDaysBBLS OilRunsBBLS WaterMCF ProdMCF SoldVent/Flare
BAKKEN8-20183124191243422602521593174631324
BAKKEN7-20183126028260242095420864457613277
BAKKEN6-20183026776268392012421090018009
BAKKEN5-20183129786296092754423479020061
BAKKEN4-201830287162844023478225732119266
BAKKEN3-20182621047212142664417677123542905

Two neighboring wells from the south, note the geologic targets:
  • 33949, 74 (no typo), Slawson, Jugard Federal 4-35-26TFH, Big Bend, t1/18; cum 94K 8/18;
  • 33948, conf, Slawson, Jugard Federal 10-35-36TF2H