Showing posts with label Insanity_Definition. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Insanity_Definition. Show all posts

Monday, February 10, 2025

There's An Obvious Solution Here -- February 10, 2025

Locator: 48528CALIFORNIA.

Money is fungible. Whatever money California might receive from the Federal government to help re-build after the fires, a significant amount of that money will be carved out for illegally documented criminals and sanctuary cities.  They might even use a bit of that money for the Bullet Train.


Thursday, December 21, 2023

Electric Grid In The Netherlands Has Reached Its Limit -- Could New EV Sales Be Suspended? December 21, 2023

Locator: 46373EVS.

This story posted yesterday in the Netherlands Times:

Map of the area affected is pretty much all the Dutch provinces that border the North Sea, or perhaps as much as one-third of the Netherlands, stretching from The Hague to Groningen. Amsterdam is on the main road between these two cities / provinces.

From the article:


How bad is it? Link to Reuters story earlier this year:



The map
:

ASML: is the only company in the world that currently produces extreme ultraviolet (EUV) orthography machines, which are used to produce cutting-edge semiconductor chips that companies like Apple rely upon.

The company is located in Veldhoven, Netherlands, a suburb on the southwest side of Eindhoven.

From wiki:


And more:

ASML, from Investopedia:


Thursday, September 28, 2023

Road To California -- Definition Of Insanity Revisited -- September 28, 2023

Locator: 45600CA.  

Bullet train: 202 / 128,000 = 0.16%. But enough to pay workers. A reminder: active duty military in California won't be paid if the federal government shuts down.


 California gasoline prices: less expensive than one year ago, but average price back over $6 / gallon, summer/winter blend switch-over, link to AAA:


Court rules XOM can't truck oil over US Highway 101 and State Route166 -- this "battle" has been going on since 2015. Link here. This is a pretty lousy article; I'm sure there are better ones out there. I have little interest in the story.

From August 18, 2021

Sunday, December 19, 2021

Parting Shot -- Matt Walsh, Twitter -- December 19, 2021

Link here.

"We are going to enter our third year of COVID with record numbers of cases but please remember that all of the measures we've taken to fight COVID have totally worked and we should keep doing the same thing indefinitely."

Einstein's definition of insanity.

Sunday, February 21, 2021

Covid, Propane, Insanity And All That Jazz -- February 21, 2021

The Israeli vaccine, link here:

Japan update:

US update:


And, of course that will lead to an increase in oil demand:


Einstein's definition of insanity
:

Friday, November 22, 2019

A Huge, Huge Miss On My Part -- A Reader Bails Me Out -- November 22, 2019

I was so caught up in the anti-Greta rant I completely missed the bigger story.

Forget about pollution.

Forget about CO2 emissions.

Look at this story in terms of economic growth in this country. Folks are laser-focused on quarterly GDP of various countries around the world, and miss the long-term story. A reader sent me this. First, a re-posting of an earlier story:
Across China, a whopping 148GW of coal-fired plants are either being built or are about to begin construction, according to a report from Global Energy Monitor, a non-profit group that monitors coal stations. Putting that number in context, the current capacity of the entire EU coal fleet is 149GW, or the same as what China is about to add.
I pride myself in taking a deeper look when given numbers I can't get my arms around, but in this case I blew it. I never thought about what 148GW of coal-fired plants meant. Yes, I saw that was the "current capacity of the entire EU coal fleet" but I blew that off -- thinking that the EU coal fleet had significantly declined over the past decade.

But a reader put this in perspective:
I have found, over the years, that simply providing raw numbers is not so impactful as charts and/or relative context. 
So ... 150 Gigawatts... If one took a massive, single 1,000 Megawatt coal fired plant ... then took 150 of them ... one would arrive at that 150 Gw figure.
That is, if each state in the US - right now - started building THREE massive coal plants, the Chinese equivalent would be realized.
(The Navajo-operated Four Corners plant - now shutting down - is rated at ~2,000 Mw).
For further context/comparison, take the two (2) massive offshore wind projects proposed off New York state - Empire and Sunrise. At an effective output of just over 800 Megawatts (1,700 namplate at 48% capacity factor), these $10 BILLION boondoggles will not even equal the output of a single, 1,000 new Chinese coal plant.
Pure insanity.
 My first thought: the off-shore wind lobby is certainly very, very powerful.

But I digress.

Forget about the pollution. Forget about the CO2 emissions (FWIW -- nothing). What catches my eye: how big China is (and will be going forward). This puts in perspective how big that population is, and what the economy will need from the rest of the world in terms of food and consumer goods.

Those numbers above -- three massive coal plants in each of the 50 US states -- that simply blows me away.

And, those offshore wind projects -- yeah ... insanity.

A huge thank you to my readers for keeping me on track.

**********************************
A Very Clever Christmas Gift / Stocking Stuffer

This is perfect for .... every age group. Seriously.



It will be interesting to see how this product does over the holidays.

I remember when I was in college a representative from 3M (makers of Scotch tape). He talked about how the company brainstormed uses for adhesive, everything from Post-It notes to adhesives used in those huge green interstate signs. This seems to be another example -- 2 x 2 photo stickies.

Tuesday, August 13, 2019

Definition Of Insanity -- August 13, 2019

Tag: definition of insanity.

From EnergyNewsNetwork: climate change brings urgency to debate over Detroit's grid resilience.

I can't take credit for this; another reader noted:

Detroit temperatures (weather) can have a 120-degree spread over six months and the grid does just fine.

But, the Detroit Grid, apparently can't handle a rise in global temperature of 1.7 degrees over the next 100 years. Already experiencing blackouts. The "journalist" apparently missed the London blackout story last week and the wind turbine debacle at the Minnesota VA facility this week.

Their solution: more non-dispatchable energy.

*************************************
The Book Page

From The Battle For New York: The City at the Heart of the American Revolution, Barnet Schecter, c. 2002, pp. 270 - 271:
The winter of 1776-1777 and the early spring at Morristown (NJ), though less famous than the ordeal at Valley Forge the following year, were a time of similar privation and suffering for the Continental Army.
However, Washington had chosen a naturally strong position surrounded by hills and forest, and by sending his men out to ambush and rob British foraging parties, he kept his greatly diminished force alive while Cornwallis remained nervously on the defensive. By spreading false reports about his troop strength, Washington also duped the British into believing he had far more than the five incomplete regiments at his disposal.
With 10,000 fully equipped professional troops only a day's march from the American camp, the British might have wiped out Washington's forces. Instead, Alexander Hamilton confirmed in more elegant prose the "extraordinary spectacle of a powerful army straitened within narrow limits by the phantom of a military force and  never permitted to transgress those limits with impunity."
Guerilla warfare.

Fast forward to the 1960s: Vietnam.

For all the lip service officers give regarding the importance of reading military history while attening Army War College it appears to be just that -- reading it but not learning from it. Wow, one just wonders how many weeks senior officers studied the Revolutionary War.

******************************
Footnotes

The footnotes in The Battle For New York: The City at the Heart of the American Revolution, Barnet Schecter, c. 2002, are among the best I've seen in any book. It was nice to see them at the bottom of the page instead of at the back of the book which would have required endless back-and-forth page turning.

One footnote, p. 118:
"Brooklyn" is the anglicized spelling and pronunciation of breukelen, a Dutch word meaning "marshland" [or swamp]. Soft and spongy because it was the bed of a valley, the ground received the runoff from the surrounding hills. Gowanus Creek was a snaking tidal inlet that penetrated the peninsula from Gowanus Cove and was surrounded by an extensive marsh. Local farmers supplemented their diet and incomes by harvesting oysters from the creek, and the otion of the tieds worked the ills that were built along its course.
The reason I bought this book was because I wanted to learn more about the geography -- particularly the waterways in and around NYC. It has turned out to be an incredible book. It might be a bit drier reading than Nathaniel Philbrick who covered the same history in Valiant Ambition but Barnet Schecter certainly was much more comprehensive. If one has time to read both, read Philbrick first and then Schecter. Philbrick's Valiant Ambition was a biography of Benedict Arnold. Schecter's book was a biography of NYC during the Revolutionary War.

Okay, one last one and then I will quit. Spuyten Duyvil: link here. Apparently it's since been filled in but the area still carries the name:
Spuyten Duyvil Creek is a short tidal estuary in New York City connecting the Hudson River to the Harlem River Ship Canal and then on to the Harlem River. The confluence of the three water bodies separate the island of Manhattan from the Bronx and the rest of the mainland.
Wiki with nice maps.


Beautiful, huh? "C Rock"? See this post, or google it yourself.

If I have any of the annotations wrong, I'm sure a reader will correct me:

Friday, February 2, 2018

Why I Love To Blog -- Reason #56 -- February 2, 2018

Updates

February 4, 2018: and, yes as predicted. South Australia awards Tesla with the contract to save their grid. From Bloomberg:
South Australia plans to roll out solar panels and Tesla Inc. batteries to at least 50,000 homes to form what its government says will be the world’s largest virtual power plant. 
If you encounter a paywall, the story is also at The Guardian:
The South Australian premier said a trial was already under way to install solar panels and Tesla batteries on 1,100 Housing Trust homes. The cost would be financed by the sale of electricity. The power generated by the solar panels and the batteries would not be owned directly by the households.
The program would later be rolled out to another 24,000 public housing properties and also offered to other households with a view to having at least 50,000 Adelaide homes connected.
Not even gonna comment.
Original Post
 
I have long forgotten the origin of this story. It began at least a year or so ago. Maybe longer. I've long forgotten.

One reader from Australia alerted me to the pending implosion of the electric grid in south Australia. a year or so ago. Another reader, closer to home, alerted me to JoanneNova.com.

To make a long story short, to save the world from global warming, Australia decided some years ago -- and very recently in the big scheme of things -- to move electricity generation from coal to wind.

Coal in Australia is very, very cheap. Wind is free.

At least that's what we're told.

On January 18, 2018, spot price for electricity South Australia and environs went as high as ... hold on to your hat ... $14,000 / MWh (no typo).

When I started watching what I call "ISO Australia" (its actual name is AMEC: the Australian Energy Market Commission) I never knew where the story would go. I was simply fascinated by how the Australian grid seemed to be falling apart.

The commission set the bar low: as long as the grid held -- no brownouts or blackouts -- regardless how much it might cost the ratepayer -- the commission declared success: they were saving the world from global warming and Australians were adapting to $14,000/MWh electricity.

Well ... as noted, when I first started following "ISO Australia" I had no idea where it was going. Tonight I found out.

A reader sent me this: AEMC wants input on how to save Australia's electricity grid -- due Monday, February 6th.

As the reader noted, the commission is desperate; the commission needs help and they need it fast. Their phones must be ringing off their hooks (as we used to say).

A scary word in that sentence: "save."

The scariest words in that sentence: "by Monday February 6th."

Let's see -- it's Friday, here, February 2nd. That would make Monday, February 5th.

February 6th would be a Tuesday. Maybe AEMC, along with saving the world from global warming, uses a different calendar ... or maybe it has something to do with the International Date Line. I don't know.

But I digress. [Something tells me I'm on thin ice here; maybe Monday really is February 6th in Australia. Check Australian calendar.]

But the AEMA needs help; and they need help now. To save the grid.

They'll worry about saving the world later.

By the way, if you take time to read the story at the link, be sure to read the comments. The commission is already getting advice.

The big question is whether Elon Musk has time to save the Australian electricity grid. 

Monday, January 29, 2018

Global Warming Taking Its Toll On New England -- January 29, 2018

New England is so desperate for Russian LNG, President Trump will go soft on Russian sanctions -- at least that's what CNBC will report. And then they will blame Trump for going soft. It would be funny except that this will drive voters to vote against Trump in 2018 (the mid-term elections).

The saga continues. 

See this post.


From Bloomberg today: as first LNG tanker from Siberia awaits landing in Boston, a second ship may be coming.

Yes, you have seen that map not less than three times on the blog. But it's priceless.

Now, Don sends me the link to this story: cold winters are testing the US energy grid. What a hoot.

The problems are only in New England. Texas handled the record demand for electricity just fine. The northern tier, Montana to Michigan, has handled the demand just fine. The only folks having problems are those who are responsible for their problem in the first place. I'm not even going to waste my time reading the linked article.

Let me know if they mention:
  • the de facto moratorium on natural gas pipelines on the east coast and the west coast
  • the moratorium on CBR to the west coast (Washington state and California)
  • that the Marcellus and the Utica are just a few miles west of Boston
  • if New England is shutting down nuclear plants before they have new energy sources in place (no, they do not)
  • that heating oil is really, really expensive; natural gas is really, really inexpensive
  • Bernie Sanders
  • Pocahontas
  • shutdown Schumer
  • Hillary's proposal to ban fracking
  • Hillary's promise to put a lot of coal miners out of work
  • wind energy and solar energy: not dispatchable
But best of all, let me know if they say this shouldn't be happening at all now that we are into our third decade -- yes, it's been that long since Algore and Patrick Kennedy warned us -- of global warming.

So, we're shipping natural gas from Siberia because we still have an LNG import terminal in Massachusetts but not enough American pipeline from the Marcellus/Utica which would be more than enough energy for all of New England; the entire east coast of the United States; and, the entire EU, with or without Britain. LOL.

Friday, January 26, 2018

LNG From Russia Set To Arrive In Boston Any Day Now -- Just In Time For The Next Polar Vortex -- January 26, 2018

Updates

January 29, 2018: update here
Original Post 

See this post -- Massachusetts importing natural gas from Russia. Tanker to arrive this weekend; a second one is scheduled to arrive February 15, 2018. This gives me a chance to re-post my favorite map:


The story is here.
The tanker carrying Russian natural gas that’s been sitting outside of Boston Harbor for days will probably land over the weekend, according to the U.S. Coast Guard.
The Gaselys carries liquefied natural gas originally produced in Siberia, according to vessel tracking data. The ship, poised to dock at Engie SA’s Everett import terminal, would be the first LNG shipment from anywhere other than Trinidad and Tobago in about three years.
“It is expected to be in the port over the weekend,” Luke Pinneo, chief petty officer at the U.S. Coast Guard in Boston, said in a telephone interview.
The delay in bringing the ship into the harbor “is not unusual,’’ according to Pinneo. Inspections can take as long as three days, depending on the time line for getting a Coast Guard boat with a boarding team to it and the specific safety concerns being addressed.
What's unusual is importing natural gas from Siberia when there is ample supply just a few miles to the west.

Sort of reminds me of a Geico commercial.

Friday, January 19, 2018

Sanctions? What Sanctions? Boston Still Importing LNG From Russia -- January 19, 2108

Refresh your memory regarding this story at this post.

Now this article: Boston, MA, still importing LNG from Russia -- Bloomberg --
The vessel named Gaselys was set to land at a terminal outside Boston on Saturday and changed its course to delay the date of its arrival, according Engie SA, the French utility that owns the cargo. 
The ship turned east last night and listed its destination as Algeciras near Gibraltar, and that entry still remains on a ship-tracking database compiled by Bloomberg.
“The final destination of the cargo did not change,” Damien de Gaulejac, a spokesman for Engie, said by email. “It is still Everett, but the date of delivery has been adjusted, in particular for weather reasons.”
The route seems a bit convoluted. This graphic helps explain it:


Disclaimer: The article refers to a "u-turn" -- obviously the tanker did not make a "u-turn"; it made a full 360-degree turn to get back on course back to the US. The route shown is for demonstration purposes only. The exact location of the "turn" and the exact route could be significantly different. If this is important to you, go to the source.

Don alerted me to the article. My reply:
I find this whole thing ridiculous. 
Sanctions against our "arch" enemy and we import their natural gas even though we have such a glut of natural gas, we are exporting it. 
For all one knows, natural gas being fungible (a commodity), that LNG in the Russian tanker originated in the US. 
Even if it "technically" did not originate in the US, for all "practical reasons" it did. So instead of a short pipeline from the natural gas fields in the Marcellus, Boston is getting their natural gas via this route:
  • Pennsylvania Marcellus natural gas to Dominion Energy Cove Point
  • tanker from DE Cove Point to Rotterdam (the Netherlands)
  • tanker from Rotterdam (the Netherlands) to Novatek PAO's Yamal facility, Russia's second LNG export terminal
  • from Yamal, Russia, back to the US, specifically Everett, MA (Boston)
Putin, the Russians, and the French must all be laughing all the way to the bank.

Sanctions? What sanctions?

Thursday, January 18, 2018

Electricity Costs: How About $9,000/MWh; That's A Bargain, It's Going To Hit $10,000/MWh; Later, $14,000/MWh -- The Road To Australia -- January 18, 2018

This is truly unbelievable. A reader alerted me to this with this message last night.
104 F degrees in Adelaide now, expected to be 103 F as the sun goes down in a few hours which will neutralize extensive rooftop solar in the region.
Tomorrow looks to be equally hot. 
Grid operator AEMO, has taken steps to obfuscate easy data gathering from site. 
These folks are just crazy to go down this path (renewable energy -- solar).
For those folks who want to see where California is headed with its most recent order affecting PG&E, just look at these charts.

Remember, in North Dakota, electricity costs, I suppose, are about $30/MWh, although I have not checked in a long, long time. $30/MWh vs $14,000/MWh for spot electricity.

I said I would check out "ISO" Australia in the morning. Well, here the screenshots taken just a few minutes ago.

$9,014/MWh:

$10,029/MWh:
$14,166/MWh:

I assume Apple won't be putting any server farms in Australia any time soon.

Elon Musk can't get his batteries to Australia fast enough. But, of course, the batteries are only to mitigate black-outs that might last minutes. His batteries will do nothing for the price of spot electricity in south Australia. Wow, what a mess.

The good news: Australians don't have to pay this price for electricity. They can simply turn everything off.

Even during the worst days during the cold snap in New England, spot prices seldom went above $500/MWh. Earlier this morning, spot prices in New England spiked to $450/MWh.

Saturday, March 4, 2017

All That Free Solar, Wind Energy Keeping California Electricity Prices Down -- March 4, 2017

Updates

March 6, 2017: the California duck curve.

Original Post 

There was an article earlier today from The Los Angeles Times about the excess wind and solar electricity California had. I was curious how much all that "free" electricity was saving California in utility bills.

This is the story I was referring to but from a different source: how California utilities are managing excess solar power. The article begins:
The Golden State is ramping up renewable energy as it pledges to be a bulwark against the Trump administration's pro-fossil fuel policies. But first, it has to figure out what to do with all the excess power it generates when the sun is shining and the wind is blowing.
California's solar farms create so much power during daylight hours that they often drive real-time wholesale prices in the state to zero. Meanwhile, the need for electricity can spike after sunset, sometimes sending real-time prices as high as $1,000 a megawatt-hour.
And that, folks is the problem with non-dispatchable energy, also known as fool's gold, or solar energy. It takes a lot of "daytime FREE solar energy" to offset electricity that costs $1,000 a megawatt-hour at night. Hey, by the way, when do Tesla owners charge their coal-powered cars? Yup, at night. When do kids work on their computers at home? Yup, at night.

Whatever.

Some links on electricity rates across the US

Nebraska.gov, data for 2015, all states; least expensive to most expensive, some examples:
  • Washington, #1: 7.41
  • Wyoming, #4: 7.95
  • Iowa, #8: 8.47
  • Texas, #10: 8.63
  • North Dakota, #13: 8.85
  • Nevada, #22: 9.48
  • Minnesota, #26: 9.69
  • National average, between #31 and #32: 10.42
  • New York, #41: 15.28
  • California, #42: 15.50 (all that free solar and wind energy helping to keep prices down)
  • Massachusetts, #44: 16.86 (wow)
  • Connecticut, #46: 17.76 (wow)
  • Hawaii, #48 (dead last -- due to some ties among states, on 48 positions): 26.17
EIA: average retail price, by state, January 17, 2017 (lower 48; does not include most expensive, Alaska and Hawaii, which are "special cases"):
  • US average: 10.41 cents
  • North Dakota: 8.75
  • California: 15.42
  • Minnesota: 9.53
  • Iowa: 8.35
  • Arkansas: 8.19
  • Louisiana: 7.65
  • New York: 15.28 
  • California: 15.42 
  • New Hampshire: 16.02 
  • Rhode Island: 17.01 
  • Connecticut: 17.77
I was reminded to look up that data: there is now a concern whether California's power grid will be able to keep up with legal marijuana's demand. Very, very high use of electricity. 

Thursday, March 20, 2014

For Investors Only; Just Exactly How Expensive Is Solar Energy?

Breaking news: Ukraine's neighbor, Moldova, now requests to "join" Russia. I haven't read the story, just the headline. Wow, isn't that interesting? I think somehow any reasonable person can say this all started with Obama's apology tour. It appears Mr Putin and former states of the USSR took the apologies seriously. My hunch is that Russia offers a better health care program for its citizens than Moldova could afford, and, of course, cheaper natural gas.
The Trans-Dniester region split from Moldova around 1990 and made a failed attempt at independence in 2006, when it held a referendum that was unrecognized internationally.
The region did not want to split from the Soviet Union at the time of its collapse and has now requested unity with Russia.
*************************************

Disclaimer: this is not an investment site. Do not make any investment decisions based on what you read here or what you think you may have read here. I report on companies that I have no investment relationship about as often as I report on companies that I invest in. If that makes sense. In other words, just because I mention a company, it doesn't mean I'm making any recommendations about it. Generally, information is posted to help me understand the Bakken better or put the Bakken into perspective. Yes, including ObamaCare and global warming.

This is simply idle chatter; waiting for another appointment. This is a note I sent a reader earlier:
Absolutely quiet out there today. I do have to agree with the lead story over at Yahoo!Finance right now -- that the markets yesterday over-reacted to the Fed's/Ms Yellin's testimony. I agree with you that rates (mortgages) will be going up, but for the general market to drop 150 points yesterday with her remarks was a bit crazy. 
First, everyone knew she was going to continue tapering. And she didn't taper by much in the big scheme of things, certainly not more than expected. Second, I think she sounded pretty dovish -- if the unemployment rate drops to 6 or 6.5, under the "old rules" the Fed was going to raise rates.  
Yellin is not going to box herself in; she says she will look at everything before raising rates (I think she's telling us she also knows the unemployment numbers are "managed." LOL). 
So, for the moment at least, the market is back up; oil down slightly. I think with the Crimean thing (and everything that looks like might follow), the price of oil will go up, all other things staying the same. 
**************************
News from California from the SRE "page."

I posted the announcement about a week ago. Forbes sees the outcome the same as I do:
After the official retirement of California’s largest nuclear plant last June, many in the environmental community there were celebrating. Now that the state’s public utility commissioners have said that the state’s utilities can use natural gas to replace a portion of that lost power, they are far less sanguine. [And it's more than just a portion; I think the split was about 80/20, natural gas/renewables.]
The closure of Southern California Edison’s San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station in June 2013 opened up a whole other debate, which is how to supplant a carbon-free electricity source in a state that has caps on how much carbon pollution utilities can emit. As expected, natural gas will be the primary fuel to do so, given that it is abundant and relatively affordable — and it’s also a fuel that can run around-the-clock.
Bloomberg notes that SRE and Con Edison will share five (5) solar farms:
Sempra Energy (SRE) and Consolidated Edison Inc. agreed to jointly own and operate five solar farms in California and Nevada that will have a total capacity of 360 megawatts. 
Each company will own 50 percent of the power plants, which all have long-term contracts to sell the electricity, San Diego-based Sempra said today in a statement. 
The deal comprises Sempra’s 250-megawatt Copper Mountain Solar 3 plant that’s under construction near Las Vegas and four Con Edison sites the went into operation in 2012, the largest of which has 50 megawatts of capacity. 
Terms weren’t disclosed. [Unfortunately, probably because of the cost.]
SRE is trading near its 52-week highs, and could hit a new high today. Again.

Also, from SRE page (this will be repeated in a stand-alone post). A press release notes:
SunEdison, a leading solar technology manufacturer and provider of solar energy services announced today that it has completed construction of a 24 MW (megawatt) DC (direct current) solar power plant located in the California Desert. 
The Cascade solar power plant is supplying renewable electricity to San Diego Gas & Electric through a 20-year Power Purchase Agreement. Wells Fargo & Company provided tax equity financing following completion of the solar power plant.
The press release did not say how much a 24MW solar power plant costs. So, how much does a 24MW solar plant cost? In Italy, quite a bit. 
PV-Tech reported last year:
Dubai-based investment company Adenium Capital has purchased a 24MW solar farm in Italy.
The €52 million (US$69 million) acquisition, in partnership with ForVEI, almost doubles the capacity of its solar portfolio.
The Calabria solar park is one of the ten largest in Italy and was originally built by Talesun Solar Switzerland.
$70 million / 24MW =  $2.9 million / MW.

So, now we have some numbers to work with:
  • Solar: $3 million / MW
  • Wind: $2.5 million / MW
  • Natural gas: $865,000 / MW
And then one wonders why the EU is going broke. And, one wonders why the US follows.

Einstein had a great definition for insanity.

Anyone who tells me wind and solar energy are free ... 

[Disclaimer: I often make simple arithmetic mistakes. If something looks wrong, it probably is; go to the linked source if you have questions. There is a probably a huge difference between what Dubai was willing to pay to have a site in Italy, compared with what smart California government bureaucrats would be willing to pay for tortoise and bird killers in the desert.]

[Later: Copper Mountain Solar Facility, SRE, 2010, 48 MW, $141 million = $3 million / MW; additional background; some ambiguity about total cost and total energy production.]

**********************************
From The EPD Page

 24WallStreet is reporting:
EPD was the beneficiary of an analyst upgrade at Credit Suisse on Wednesday. The firm’s John Edwards raised Enterprise Products to Outperform from Neutral, and the target was raised to $78, versus a $68.80 close.
This upgrade is significant for several reasons. First is that Enterprise is the largest standalone entity in the land of master limited partnerships (MLPs). Second is that the MLP sector has been battered with concerns about lower distributions (yield equivalents). A third reason this upgrade stands out so much is because this $78 price target represents upside of more than 13%, plus that 4.1% distribution yield. Lastly, the $78 price target is only $2 shy of the street high price target, and it is more than $5 above the consensus price target.
So, what does Credit Suisse’s John Edwards see here that is above and beyond most other analysts after an analyst meeting update?
Edwards shows a 1.5 times distribution coverage at its current distribution growth trajectory, as well as an investment of three to four times the capital to sustain that growth trajectory, which should allow Enterprise to grow the distribution faster than most MLPs.