Saudi Arabia reportedly looking at US shale assets to diversity Aramco.
Link here. And,
here, at The Wall Street Journal.
Saudi Arabia is reportedly looking at natural-gas assets in Texas shale basins and is in talks with a U.S. liquefied natgas producer as it looks to break into U.S. shale.
Saudi Arabia is reportedly looking at natural-gas assets in Texas shale basins and is in talks with a U.S. liquefied natgas producer as it looks to break into U.S. shale.
State-run oil giant Saudi Aramco is in early negotiations with Tellurian to buy a stake or some of its natural gas. The report also said Armaco has asked about assets in the Permian and Eagle Ford shale formations.
If the company starts production in the U.S., it would be the first time it had any output from outside the kingdom. It also would come after three years of struggles to cool shale's growth, which has upended markets that Saudi Arabia once swayed as the swing producer.
But the kingdom's domestic energy needs may be prompting an embrace of its U.S. rivals. Investing in shale would give Saudi Arabia access to the U.S. industry's ability to quickly start and stop production projects and use that knowledge back at home.
"Saudi Arabia has a lot of shale, a lot of tight gas," said Jim Krane, an energy analyst at Rice University's Baker Institute for Public Policy. "Aramco needs to get to the gas because Saudi Arabia is very short on natural gas. The only way to get to it without imports is to tap into shale."
Saudi Aramco won't be the first Middle Eastern country to invest in U.S. shale; the UAE's Mubadala sovereign fund has invested in a private equity firm in U.S. shale, the report said.
Much, much more at the linked article.
The linked
WSJ article is the better of the two articles:
Using hydraulic fracturing techniques to unlock oil and gas from
shale formations, the U.S. has become the world’s largest producer of
oil and gas combined and is starting to export its energy abundance.
Saudi oil shipments—once the dominant source of crude for America—in
September hit their lowest levels to the U.S. in 30 years.
“From a
historical standpoint, it’s striking,” said
Jason Bordoff,
director of Columbia University’s Center on Global Energy Policy.
It is “a reminder of how dramatic the impact of the shale revolution
has been,” he said.
The changes have helped accelerate a transformation in Saudi society orchestrated by 32-year-old Crown Prince
Mohammed bin Salman.
I think residents of New York state need to be asking their governor why US shale looks so good to Saudi Arabia and their state government bans fracking. I think the adage, "cut off your nose to spite your face" fits in this particularly circumstance.
By the way: I wonder
if Jane Nielson is still following the Bakken?
***************************************
The Road To Germany
(Re-Posting From October 26, 2017)
One could devote a whole blog to Germany's energy problems. A reader has
sent me a number of links to various articles showing how bad things
really are (and getting worse) in Germany. I read a fair amount of
material on Germany's energy challenges late last night. But this data
point jumped out at me, buried
in a very technical journal touting the success Germany is having with its renewable energy program (wink, wink):
About 90% of hard coal was imported, in comparison with 98% import dependence for oil and 90% for natural gas.
Imagine if Hillary had been elected, and then served two full terms, and
banned fracking as she promised during her campaign, and put a lot of
miners out of work, as she also promised -- what would the US look like
if US energy needs were those of Germany? What would the US look like if
the US imported 98% of its oil, 90% of its natural gas, 90% of its hard
coal?
*************************************
The Magnitude of the GOP Tax Bill
A "never Trumper" sent me an e-mail:
Still hard for me to wrap my head around the fact that either party can write major legislation in secret with no input from the other party. Yes, I know the democrats do this, too, but it just doesn’t seem right.
My "not-ready-for-prime-time" reply:
You have no idea how many times the GOP asked the Democrats to come on board, in general.
Specifically, they targeted six Democratic senators up for re-election but those Democratic senators refused to come to the meetings. Afraid of Schumer.
One of the targeted individuals was Heidi Heitkamp of ND -- this was a huge bill for all those North Dakota millionaires due to oil and she refused to get involved. I talked about that in my blog. She had an opportunity to get her own chapter in "Profiles in Courage" to do what was good for North Dakota, but she was afraid of Schumer.
Just after that exchange, I happened to hear a five-minute interview with Paul Ryan on the Rush Limbaugh radio show. This is what stood out:
- "never-Trumpers" will listen to Rachel Maddow's "take" on the tax bill but these same "never-Trumpers" won't listen to the originators of the bill (e.g., Paul Ryan) who know it best or read the tax bill for themselves;
- this is a huge bill, much bigger than anyone can imagine -- can you imagine if your tax bill went from 35% to 21% overnight? think about that;
- the average corporate tax rate in the industrialized world is 21.5% which means that some countries have rates lower than 21% -- but the US is now at the average corporate tax rate in the industrialized world; companies will no longer re-locate overseas simply to take advantage of lower tax rates
- the tax cut bill is very much unlike ObamaCare which was a) a huge drag on the economy; b) seen as a "train wreck" by Dems who actually voted for it; c) a huge tax on every American; d) a huge disruptor of the American health sector; and,which was e) taking America down the road to socialism (vis-a-vis Canada, the EU, Russia)
- the tax cut bill is completely different: as far as I can tell, no one will be sending more money to Washington, DC; it opens up ANWR (Alaska) for drilling; it pretty much ends ObamaCare as we know it
- I have no idea why anyone is upset about the corporate tax rate cut; DC has a spending problem, not a revenue problem
- Congress and senators listened to the public; they got rid of that crazy, crazy FIFO idea
- Paul Ryan has been working on this bill for decades; folks who suggest this was rushed are the same folks who would suggest the Beatles were an overnight sensation; the Beatles worked their asses off from 1957 to 1962 in clubs in Germany and England; their first album was not recorded until 1963
- a bill that has been worked on for decades and is several hundred pages long is going to have a lot in it of which none of us are even aware (by the way, look up the history of the IRA)
- much of it is too technical for any of us to understand but "bean-counters in green visors in the back offices" will spend the next several months figuring it out;
- the Affordable Care Act quickly became known as ObamaCare; even its #1 apologist knew that it was not affordable; over time ObamaCare was seen as a disparaging term for the healthcare program; so far, the alt-left and "never-Trumpers" have not been able to come up with a disparaging name for this bill (though, over time, they may succeed); "Tax Cut Bill For Millionaires" does not have the snappy soundbite that ObamaCare has; "Trumponomics" -- currently favored by CNBC won't last; Reaganomics worked; "Trumponomics" won't
- as I noted above, Heidi Heitkamp did North Dakota no favors by not trying to get something in this bill that would have helped her state; anyone can offer amendments; if she thought this bill was going to pass, she should have gotten something for her state (having said that, North Dakota did have a strong US senator and he certainly watched out for our interests); by stepping out from under the Schumer shadow she could have had her own chapter in Profiles in Courage
*********************************
One-Two Punch
The first punch: see the short note on Germany's energy needs above.
The second punch: America's 21% corporate tax rate.
**************************************
ATT Will Pay "Every" Employee A $1,000 Special Bonus
-- Simply Because The Tax Bill Passed
Link here:
Today, Congress approved legislation representing the first
comprehensive tax reform in a generation. The President is expected to
sign the bill in the coming days.
Once tax reform is signed into law,
AT&T* plans to invest an additional $1 billion in the United
States in 2018 and pay a special $1,000 bonus to more than 200,000
AT&T U.S. employees — all union-represented, non-management and
front-line managers. If the President signs the bill before Christmas, employees will receive the bonus over the holidays.
“Congress, working closely with the President, took a monumental step
to bring taxes paid by U.S. businesses in line with the rest of the
industrialized world,” said Randall Stephenson, AT&T chairman and
CEO. “This tax reform will drive economic growth and create good-paying
jobs. In fact, we will increase our U.S. investment and pay a special
bonus to our U.S. employees.”
You can bet they are going to earn a lot more just from all the overtime pay that comes with $1 billion in CAPEX -- and the bonus, if paid in 2018, will be at a lower tax rate than if it is paid this year.
*****************************
Others
Fifth Third Bank: will raise minimum hourly wage to $15; will distribute a $1,000 special bonus to employees.
Wells Fargo: will raise minimum hourly wage to $1/hour. No mention of any bonus. Says hourly rate will increase once the tax bill is signed.
Comcast: fourth company to announce. Will give employees a $1,000 bonus.
Oksol: announces that in addition to the three trips to Flathead Lake every year, he will now take four cross-country trips each year because the GOP tax bill passed. My first trip will be to Albuquerque, NM. Details pending.
Others overnight: Boeing, but less specific.
