Locator: 48778TARIFFS.
This tells me all I need to know about Europe's economy.
Hanging by a thread. Or hanging by a threat.
EU can’t afford to lose the US market. They’re in no position to raise tariffs.
Locator: 48778TARIFFS.
Hanging by a thread. Or hanging by a threat.
EU can’t afford to lose the US market. They’re in no position to raise tariffs.
Locator: 48777EVS.
I honestly did not know these stories still existed. We used to see these stories day in / day out ten years ago, but I thought we well past this stage of EV development. Wow.
From InsideEVs, August 2, 2025:
As noted, it would be unusual for any current gasoline-powered / diesel-powered vehicle on the road today that could not make the trip from Minneapolis, MN, to Chicago, IL, on a single "tank of gas."
But this driver, even before she started out, knew she would have to make several stops in her EV to go that distance.
She needed to charge five separate times on her journey.
After her first stop out of Minneapolis, she still had three more re-charging stops before she reached her destination.
When she began her fully-charged journey in Minneapolis, her infotainment screen indicated that she had one hour and eight minutes of range, before she needed to stop for her first re-charging once on the road.
Are you kidding me?
But this is what's amazing.
On social media at this "green site," no one was concerned about the 800-lb gorilla in the room (lack of range even on a full charge) but wrote into give advice on how to accomplish the trip with fewer recharging stops.
Okay, so that's exactly how I want to lead my life. Every time I get into my EV with a destination more than a hundred miles away, I need to "crowdsource" advice on how best to make that trip.
LOL.
And that's why EVs are not for me, and that's why it's going to be a long time before "real" EVs become the car of the people.
Having said that, folks love "fake EVs." That's because with their gasoline engines there's no range anxiety and one can get from Minneapolis to Chicago on a single tank of gas.
I would expect to see this story in a marketing brochure for gasoline-powered muscle cars, not in a "green / EV" media outlet. But this was a feature story in InsideEVs.
My hunch: Ms Erika McEntarfer will fine a welcoming home at InsideEVs where she can make up the numbers as she goes along.
The author of the article, his profile is here.
Locator: 48776DISCLAIMER.
**********************************
Disclaimer
Brief
Reminder
Briefly:
Locator: 48775MARKET.
We'll talk about this today.
All I can say is that a lot of folks don't seem to be paying attention.
We'll talk about it later.
**********************************
Disclaimer
Brief
Reminder
Briefly:
Locator: 48774B.
WTI: $66.27.
Active rigs: 30.
Three new permits: #42175 - #42177, inclusive;
Three permits renewed:
Six permits canceled:
Two producing wells (DUCs):
Locator: 48773BRK.
Disclaimer: this is not an investment site.
We're long past the "Warren_Buffett_Premium."
Ticker today:
Meanwhile,
And the news out today, is that BRK may have sold more of its Bank of America, and no talk of any recent purchases, no strategic direction, and no stock buybacks. And, of course, never pays a dividend. More on BRK here.
App Economy: link here.
Palantir: continues to soar. At $50 mom-and-pop retail investors were talked out of buying Palantir as being too expensive. They were told the same thing at $100, then again at $150, and now it's trading at $160 and some say it could hit $200. And, of course, now, it is too expensive. LOL.
Locator: 48772B.
Updates
August 5, 2025: WMB's earnings.
August 5, 2025: Oneok's earnings.
Original Post
Disclaimer: this is not an investment site.
Recession: recession talk back on the table; I think folks are using terms incorrectly --
OKE: earnings after market close today --
AOL: three energy stocks to buy with $500 and hold forever, August 3, 2025, Motley Fool, link here:
Boeing: another strike. Not expected to impact Boeing all that much.
ChatGPT: reports surge in daily usage, m/m. Set to hit 700 million weekly active users this week.
Pipelines:
***********************************
Back to the Bakken
WTI: $66.12.
New wells:
RBN Energy: Enbridge's oil pipeline expansions likely to spur more projects downstream. Archived.
Western Canadian crude oil production is rising fast. To keep pace, Enbridge is planning expansions to its pipelines into the Midwest and Great Plains. But PADD 2 refineries are maxed out on heavy crude, so virtually all those incremental barrels will need to keep flowing south to refineries and export terminals along the Gulf Coast. Can the pipelines from PADD 2 to PADD 3 handle the higher volumes? In today’s RBN blog, we discuss the knock-on effects of rising Western Canadian production and Enbridge’s pipeline expansions.
A few months ago, in Here, There and Everywhere, we examined Enbridge’s plan to spend up to C$2 billion (US$1.5 billion) by 2028 to improve the efficiency and reliability of its 3.28-MMb/d Mainline pipeline system from Alberta to the Midwest that the midstreamer has said will increase its 96% utilization rate by 1% or 2%. Enbridge also is investing another C$1.5 billion (US$1.1 billion) by 2027 on a multiphase optimization project that will boost the system’s capacity by 150 Mb/d — and maybe more, if demand warrants. In addition, the company is looking to add up to 30 Mb/d of capacity to its 310-Mb/d Express-Platte pipeline system, which runs from Hardisty, AB, to Wood River, IL, just west of the Patoka, IL, crude oil hub. Enbridge has hinted that further expansions to Express-Platte are possible.
More recently, in You’ve Got a Friend in Me, we discussed our latest forecast for Western Canadian crude oil production and stacked that up against available and planned pipeline capacity out of the region. The bottom line? Even with the May 2024 startup of the 590-Mb/d Trans Mountain Expansion Project (TMX) to Canada’s British Columbia coast, 180 Mb/d in planned expansions to Enbridge’s pipelines (150 Mb/d on the Mainline and 30 Mb/d on Express-Platte) by 2027, and higher utilization of the Mainline (maybe another 50 Mb/d), Western Canadian producers and shippers may well face a takeaway capacity crunch by late 2028 — only three years from now. In other words, keep those capacity-adding projects comin’!
In today’s blog, we assume that our production forecast is on point and that Enbridge will find shipper support for another 150 Mb/d in Mainline expansions, resulting in a total of 380 Mb/d of incremental flows down the Mainline and Express-Platte systems by the late 2020s (150 from initial Mainline expansion + 30 from Express-Platte expansion + 50 from Mainline efficiencies + 150 from future Mainline expansion). That all raises a new and important question: Where will that extra 380 Mb/d end up?
Let’s begin with a little background. Canadian crude oil exports to the U.S. have more than doubled over the past 15 years, from about 2 MMb/d in 2010 to 4.2 MMb/d in 2024. PADD 2 (Midwest/Great Plains) is by far the largest destination, accounting for two-thirds (or about 2.8 MMb/d; dark-blue layer in Figure 1 below) of last year’s total. Of the 2.8 MMb/d that ended up in PADD 2, ~2.3 MMb/d was heavy crude and the rest (~500 Mb/d) was light/medium crude — together, these types accounted for 73% of the more than 3.8 MMb/d of crude PADD 2 refineries received, on average, in 2024, with Western Canadian heavy accounting for 60% of their crude slate and Western Canadian light/medium making up 13%. (The 27% balance was U.S.-sourced light oil.)
Canadian Crude Oil Exports to the U.S. by PADD
Figure 1. Canadian Crude Oil Exports to the U.S. by PADD.
Sources: EIA and Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers