Monday, May 5, 2025

Scrolling Down X -- End Of Day -- May 5, 2025

Locator: 48593ARCHIVES.

ATF: I completely missed this; revolving doors:

  • last week: FBI director Kash Patel was also Acting Director, ATF (Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives).
  • this week: US Army Secretary Daniel Patrick Driscoll replaces Kash Patel as a dual-hatted director.
  • back story: first confirmed Director, ATF, since 2015, Steve Dettelbach would have been sacked by President Trump at the request of the NRA, had he not resigned the day before Trump took office.
    • Dettelbach loathed by the NRA
  • starting to sound like Henry VIII's wives
    • Steve Dettelback: resigned before getting sacked
    • Kash Patel: replaced
    • Daniel Driscoll: acting

WTI: $50-oil looks likely.

DOD to reduce number of general officers; number of stars. Talked about for years; finally getting done. A Biden administration would have taken too much political heat cutting the number of general officers, but the Trump administration / GOP can take the heat.

According to Hegseth, there are currently 44 four-star and flag officers across the military, making for a ratio of one general to 1,400 troops, compared to the ratio during World War II of one general to 6,000 troops.

AI gets this completely wrong suggesting that firing the Chairman, Joint Chiefs of Staff, was a cut of one four-star general, but it does shed light where the cuts might come.


 

All forty-four four-star generals: wiki. When I go through the list, it looks like DOD will have a tough time coming up with a 20%reduction (20% of 44 = 8.8 = 10) because of "statutes." 

Most interesting, "vice" positions are "safe" as four-stars due to statute. Could they make all joint combatant commanders 3-star unless war is officially called and then promote them to four stars. See all major generals at wiki.

Alcatraz. Not gonna happen but makes a great headline.

Skype: RIP. 

OpenAI: biggest tech story today -- OpenAI reverses course -- will remain a nonprofit. Huge news for Musk's xAI; others.

North Dakota interstate 94: from 75 mph to 80 mph. Will join South Dakota and Montana. Restrictions apply.

HIMS: surging. 

WMB: almost 2% better than consensus.

Measles: three more cases in northwestern North Dakota. Population, northwestern North Dakota: 9.

Palantir: is this the most talked-about tech stock today? Holy mackerel. It's all Palantir. 

Apple: keeps dropping prices on its hardware; losing court battles on services; share price keeps dropping.

Rivian: gets $16 million from Illinois to build new supplier park. $16 million. That's from the state of Illinois. That's pocket change for Elon Musk.

Earthquakes in the Permian: yesterday, 5.4; today 3.6. Waste-water related. Move along; nothing to see here.

The most important thing to understand about American politics today, Trump's net approval, Rasmussen Reports:

  • married men: +19%
  • married women: 0%
  • single men: +16%
  • single women: -26%

But we need to know numbers in each demographic and percent that actually go out and vote.

Berkshire's earnings fell short: now being reported by Barron's. The blog noted that over the weekend. BRK's earnings didn't just fall short; they were atrocious.

Houthis: IDF (Israel) now striking Houthi targets. All well and good but strikes need to be directed to source of Houthis' munitions: Iran.

Gaza: Israel plans to occupy and flatten all of Gaza if no deal by Trump's trip, “next week.” Who should be worried?

  • first, Egypt;
  • then, Syria, Lebanon, Jordan

Generational mistakes:

  • Buffett: didn't buy cryptocurrency. Or Palantir.
  • Biden: didn't secure the southern border.
  • EU: completely misread geopolitics when Biden defeated Trump. Putin’s window of opportunity.
  • too early to tell, but tea leaves suggest the GOP is letting their opportunities slip away. 

Five DUCs Reported As Completed; Eighteen Permits Renewed; Petro-Hunt With Three New Permits -- May 5, 2025

Locator: 48592B.

Signal: The NYTimes is obsessed with government officials using "Signal." As if it's never been used by any previous administration.

********************************
Back to the Bakken

WTI: $57.11.

Active rigs: 31.

Three new permits, #41876 - #41878, inclusive:

  • Operator: Petro-Hunt
  • Field: Cottonwood (Mountrail)
  • Comments:
    • Petro-Hunt has permits for three State wells, lot 3, section 1-158-92, 
      • to be sited 300 FNL and 2373 / 2510 FWL.

Eighteeen (18) permits renewed:

  • Lime Rock Resource III (9):
    • three Mariner permits, Dimond, Burke County;
    • three Harland permits in Murphy Creek, Dunn County;
    • two Reuben Schneider permits, Dunn County;
    • a Sten Rav permit in McKenzie County;
  • BR (5): 
    • three Abercrombie permits; 
    • one Abersom permit; and, 
    • one Aberlid permit, all five in Elidah oil field, McKenzie County;
  • XTO (3): three Lawlar wells, North Tobacco Garden, McKenzie County;
  • Formentera Operations: a Grays State well, Colgan, Divide County;

Three permits canceled:

  • Enerplus, #41399, #41400, #41404: Steamboat, Loveland, and Arches, all in McKenzie County;


 

Five producing wells (DUCs) reported as completed:

  • 39811, 568, Kraken, Apollo 18-7-6 1H, Williams,
  • 39812, 451, Kraken, Apollo 18-7-6 2H, Williams,
  • 40551, 1,787, CLR, Sandhill 3-24H, Williams,
  • 40662, 1,775, CLR, Sandhill 4-24H, Williams,
  • 40672, 2,009, CLR, Carpenter 4-13H, Williams

NBA: Round Two Begins Tonight -- May 5, 2025

Locator: 48591ARCHIVES.

Scrolling through x before market open.

BRK: drops 3% at the open; drops $20 / share. 

It’s almost a year before Warren steps down and he will still be chairman of the board. 1Q25 earnings were atrocious. So what is driving BRK today … insurance losses and BNSF …. and Trump’s tariffs … or the announcement everyone knew would eventually come? Is BRK positioned for the sixth industrial revolution?

Skechers: announces it will go private; sells out at $63 / share. Shares soar.

Netflix: down as much as 5% today, after Trump suggests 100% tariff on movies shot overseas.

Student loans: Dept of Education begins collecting loan payments today.

NVDA: if the stock moves today, it may have to do with Bitcoin, taking a page out of MicroStrategy's playbook.

EOG: very bullish on natural gas.

Inflation: falling fast, per Tom Lee; would fall even faster if it weren't for "shelter." "Shelter" includes rent, I suppose. And, there lies the rub. Landlords still have pricing power. Especially in DFW area.

Israel: will Israel wait longer than a week to respond to the Houthi missile attack on the Tel Aviv airport?

Ford To Report After Close Today -- Not Ready For Prime Time -- May 5, 2025

Locator: 48590F.

Reminder: this is not an investment site.

Updates

May 6, 2025:

Lucid got way too much attention in 1Q25 so I was curious: why? Why so much attention. Then looking at the numbers: if I'm reading this correctly, Lucid delivered 3,109 vehicles in 1Q25, up almost 60% compared the same quarter one year earlier (2024). And almost the same number as Ford's electric Mustangs and electric EVs combined.

Meanwhile, Ford sold a total of 4,667 electric Mustangs and electric F-150s combined in 1Q25 compared to 6,983 in the same quarter one year earlier (2024), a drop of 33%.

For me, this is not a story about Lucid. This is a story about Ford.

Ford:

First quarter, 2025, Ford sold:

  • 2,927 Mustangs Mach-E; and,
  • 1,740 F-150 Lightnings:
  • total: 4,667

Lucid, 1Q25, link here:

May 6, 2025: shares recovered today in early trading, up 4%, trading at $10.56. The P/E of 7.23 is incredibly generous considering the underlying guidance (none/suspended).

Ford cannot afford to cut its dividend. Everything suggests that's the only thing supporting the share price. F pays 5.68%. At its recent low, F was paying 7.1% ad that was the regular divided of 15 cents quarterly. In addition, F has paid a special dividend of 15 cents to 30 cents once a year (on top of the regular dividend. 90 cents / 8.44 = 10.7%. F paid a special dividend of 30 cents in March, 2025 (at $8.44 / share = 10.66% dividend).

May 6, 2025: the more one studies the numbers, the more one gets the feeling that Ford literally bet the farm on EVs.

May 6, 2025: from earlier this year, link here:

May 6, 2025: how did Ford spin 1Q25 earnings?

Despite the surge in April, 2025, sales, Ford still sold fewer cars in April, 2025, than it did in April, 2015, and April, 2016. Link here.

May 6, 2025: a reminder --  

May 6, 2025: Ford has three core competencies:

  • the F-150 and several variations, including the Lightning
  • EVs, including the Mustang
  • miscellaneous, to include vans to support commercial fleets; and, a few legacy SUVs


The EV Mustang
, an update, May 5, 2025.

EVs struggle, an update, May 5, 2025.


EVs are taking a toll on Ford, others
. Ford has literally bet the farm on EVs. 

Ford needed a friend in the White House. When Biden was defeated by Trump, November, 2024, Ford lost the one friend it really, really needed. It's one thing to have one bad year, but even under the best of circumstances, it appeared EVs wold have several bad years. Now, with Trump in the White House and states on both the west coast and the east coast dialing back EV mandates, the EV revolution has hit a wall. Whether the industry can scale that wall will be fascinating to watch.

Ford manufactures its EV F-150 Lightning in Michigan but many of the parts are foreign. Ford has not made any plans to move production of the Ford Mustang (EV) out of Mexico despite a huge drag due to 20% tariffs. It's interesting: in 2023, Ford said it could not "survive" with UAW demands at the time (subsequently rolled back to some extent) but apparently the electric Mustang is a different story -- not really "too big to fail," but rather, afficionados will pay almost any price for a Mustang. Four years of tariffs on cars made in Mexico? 

Ford estimated huge losses going forward for many years in its EV division and that was before the Trump tariffs.


 

Original Post
1Q25 Earnigs

After years of following automotive data very, very superficially, the fog is starting to clear.

I think there are two big takeaways in this for the automotive sector in the G-7:

  • no growth;
  • cars are lasting longer and longer; EVs will exacerbate the situation.

Expanding:

  • first problem: no growth:
    • within the G-7 (the US, EU, Canada, and Japan) when it comes to privately owned automobiles, the pie is finite and not growing.
      • the automobile industry is not going to grow by selling more vehicles
      • automobile manufacturers are competing with each other for a piece of the pie, for a pie that is not growing size
        • at one time, mom and pop with one car would have six kids and eventually the family would need seven cars;
        • now the size of families are decreasing in the G-7 and that mom and pop with fewer children can afford a second car, but they only having two children = four cars;
    • the automobile industry is not a dying industry, it's simply static
    • for the bottom line to improve across the entire sector in the G-7, the price per automobile needs to increase and/or the margins on each automobile sold have to increase
    • as the prices increase, the industry becomes more and more dependent on the economic cycle
    • money is not being made on automobiles with lower sticker prices; at some point, as the price of the automobile comes down, the margins reach diminishing returns
    • so much more; one could go on and on, but I don't see the automobile sector as a growth sector.
    • FRED auto sales by year: link here.
  • the second big problem:
    • used cars are simply lasting longer and longer and longer
    • with cars lasting longer and longer, sales will become more and more dependent on state of economy
      • in a bad economy, folks will be able to get "one more year" out of the car they are currently driving
        • exhibit A: my three cars:
          • 2005 Chrysler minivan
          • 2007 Chrysler minivan 
          • 2012 Honda Civic
    • EVs will make that even worse: parts won't wear out and software will simply be updated
    • replacing batteries and tires -- that's about all there is
    • with so little to go wrong, this will extend the life of a given EV

The winner:

  • high end, expensive cars
  • that pie -- the number of folks able to buy more expensive cars -- is growing bigger

This is all for the archives. It will be interesting to come back to this discussion in 30 years and see how the arguments all hold up. 

Earning Are Out

  • 1Q25
    • EPS: 14 cents vs 2 cents expected (tariff fears helped this immensely)
    • revenue: $40.7 billion vs $38.02 billion (tariff fears helped this immensely)
  • y/y
    • EPS: down 71% y/y
    • revenue: 5% y/y
  • q/q
    • EPS down 64% q/q
    • revenue down 16% q/q
  • After hours: F --> at $9.89, down 2.75% 

For The Archives

 

Original Post

Ford is a lot like Apple: their base is incredibly loyal. And if there's any brand that means "America" across all demographic groups, it's Ford.

Ford: link here to Barron's

Will report after hours tonight. Solid earnings report expected. Guidance will be the real story. Even though some companies are not providing guidance in the current environment, analysts suggest Ford will provide guidance based on tariffs, and guidance will be significantly lowered, based on GM's guidance earlier. [Later: Ford suspends guidance.]

  • operating profit: $171 million; one year ago, $2.8 billion
    • remember: tariffs did not affect the numbers being released today
    • in fact, 1Q25 Ford should have benefited from tariffs as folks bought early to avoid possible tariffs;
    • I thought that $171 million was exceptional
  • will they break out EV numbers?
  • breakeven per share on sales of $38 billion;
    • last year: EPS of 49 cents on sales of $42.8 billion
  • historically the stock rises or falls 7 - 9% after earnings released
  • biggest question: dividend going forward -- for the next 24 months.  
    • number of outstanding shares: 4 billion shares
    • 15 cents (per quarter; 7.7% annual payout): 15 cents x 4 billion shares = $600,000 each quarter (plus the company generally pays a generous special dividend at least once a year -- generally in February -- 
    • the $171 million operating profit expected 1Q25 will not come close to covering the  $600,000,000 dividend payout
    • full year guidance: operating profit, $6 billion
    • last year (2024), dividends paid, 90 cents x 4 billion shares = $3.6 billion, which suggests the dividend is very safe
    • disclaimer: I often make simple arithmetic errors

 Reminder: this is not an investment site.

Manic Monday -- First Trading Day After Warren Buffett Announcement -- May 6, 2025

Locator: 48589B.

Reminder: this is not an investment site. 

Buffett: Buffett to remain Chairman after stepping down as CEO / president of the company.  And the change is not effective until January 1, 2026, about a year from now.

Employment: from Liz Ann Sonders today, among many graphs she posted on x today -- link here. This really surprised me -- prime-age labor force participation rate in April at 84% -- but pay attention to the y axis -- it's a very, very narrow range. Having said that, compare to the non-Covid years after 2022 withthe pre-Covid years in the 20-teens. Truly amazing. And they say we're in a recession. Certainly doesn't feel like one.

And more. I'm not sure what to make of this graphic. Link here.

The graphic below is "normalized" as of the end of 2019, so "normalization" begins in 2020, the very year Covid-19 lock down began. Certainly the Biden surge must have had a lot to do with this. The answer to the real question is whether the "native-born" population (or the US economy) could have kept up without the southern surge? That answer we will never know, but there are really only two possibilities: a) yes, but the wage inflation would have been huge, perhaps not sustainable; or, b) no, and the US economy would have suffered greatly. In both cases, the Biden surge may have been the preferable route had it been handled better.

********************************
Back to the Bakken

WTI: $57.66.

New wells:

Tuesday, May 6, 2025: 20 for the month, 120 for the quarter, 312 for the year,

  • 40721, conf, Petro-Hunt, USA 153-95-5D-31-5H,
  • 40720, conf, Petro-Hunt, USA 153-95-5A-31-3H,
  • 40523, conf, Zavana, Collie 13-25-5H XE,
  • 39818, conf, Hess, RS-Nelson Farms-LE-156-91-1819-1,
  • 22663, conf, Enerplus, Morgan 149-93-29B-32H,

Monday, May 5, 2025: 15 for the month, 115 for the quarter, 307 for the year,

  • 40492, conf, Oasis, Lee N 5201 21-5 3B,

Sunday, May 4, 2025: 14 for the month, 114 for the quarter, 306 for the year,

  • 41146, conf, BR, Devils Backbone 5C,
  • 41065, conf, BR, Tilton 2C,
  • 40719, conf, Petro-Hunt, USA 153-95-5A-31-3H,
  • 40712, conf, Silver Hill Energy, Tank E 156-98-1-12-3MBH,
Saturday, May 3, 2025: 10 for the month, 110 for the quarter, 302 for the year,
  • 41066, conf, BR, Tilton 2D,
  • 40718, conf, Petro-Hunt, USA 153-95-5A-31-2H,
  • 39817, conf, Hess, RS-Flickertail-156-91-1720H-7,

RBN Energy: US propane pricing reflects seasonality, contract provisions, transport costs.

The U.S. propane market may appear seamless at times, but a lot is happening just below the surface to determine consumer pricing. Key factors include the high seasonality of demand, supply contracts that must account for the seasonality of product delivery and the price, and the cost of transportation from terminals to bulk plants to end users. In today’s RBN blog, we will review the final delivery steps, the impact of transportation costs, and how contracts are priced.