Showing posts with label Permits_2012. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Permits_2012. Show all posts

Thursday, August 29, 2019

Notes From All Over, Part 1 -- August 29, 2019

Wow, it already feels like Friday.

But we will press on.

**************************************
Ethanol

EIA: US ethanol plant nameplate capacity up in 2019. Link here. Data points:
  • US with about 200 operational ethanol plants
  • spread across the US
  • increase in capacity year-over-year was 326 million gallons (per year)
  • 16.542 billion gallons in 2018
  • 16.868 billion gallons in 2018
  • percent increase, year-over-year: 2%
US gasoline demand, year-over--year. Link here.
  • this year four-week average, 08/23/19: 9.777 million bbls/day
  • last year (2018) four-week average, 08/24/18: 9.553 million bbls/day
  • year-over-year increase: 2%
*****************************
Japanese Beef

A reminder for me. Wagyu beef was on the menu at local restaurant we visited yesterday; I keep forgetting "definition" of wagyu. From wiki:
Wagyu is any of the four Japanese breeds of beef cattle. In several areas of Japan, wagyu beef is shipped carrying area names. Some examples are Matsusaka beef, Kobe beef, Yonezawa beef, Mishima beef, Ōmi beef, and Sanda beef. 
In recent years, wagyu beef has increased in fat percentage due to decrease in grazing and an increase in using feed, resulting in larger, fattier cattle.
***************************************
Recession Fears

Overblown. The Wall Street Journal
The yield curve is upside down, leading to worry about recession. Stocks declined last week after the 10-year Treasury yield fell below the two-year Treasury yield. Yet while an inversion of the yield curve has preceded all postwar recessions, not all inversions signal imminent recession. The curve was flat for most of the 1990s, and even inverted briefly in 1998, without a recession. Today, given the economy’s underlying strength, fears of immediate recession are overblown.
U.S. gross domestic product grew 2.1% in the second quarter, and the Atlanta Federal Reserve forecasts 2.2% annualized third-quarter growth. The generally accepted definition of a recession is two consecutive quarters of negative GDP growth. GDP consists of four components: consumption, government spending, net exports and business investment.
It should be noted that the mainstream media has a new definition of recession: GDP trending to less than whatever "they" want the GDP to be. Their definition of "recession" does not need to be:
  • rigorous
  • accurate
  • based on generally accepted criteria
  • based on negative GDP growth
  • based on any period greater than a day
I posted this mostly to note the generally accepted definition because one knows that will change over the next 24 months.

On another note, like the states, my hunch is that there will be winners and losers in the global economy.

Reminds me of the joke about two hikers in the wood confronted by an angry bear. 

A few "facts" from the linked article:
Consumption looks strong.
Through July, retail sales have increased this year, consumer confidence has rebounded, and productivity—output per hour worked—has experienced some of the largest increases in decades.
When a recession occurs, weekly unemployment claims are first to tick up. They aren’t rising, and there are more openings than unemployed people. Given this labor-market strength, an increase in consumer spending—which accounted for 68% of GDP in 2018—is far likelier than a decrease.
Government spending accounted for 18% of GDP in 2018 and grew 3% during the first half of 2019 amid growing deficits. Net exports reduced last year’s GDP by 3.3%, down to 3.1% so far this year.
Today's jobless report, pending:
  • prior: 209K
  • revised: 211K
  • consensus: 213K
  • actual: 215K
**********************************
Closing The Loop

A reader recently pointed out, with regard to oil and gas permits in North Dakota:
  • permits > spuds (brilliant)
  • PNC (canceled permits significantly greater than 1%): accurate 
  • permits: cheap and easy (tells me all I need to know about the source). Permits are neither "cheap" nor "easy." I assume the cost to prepare a greenfield oil and gas permit application runs into the hundreds of thousands of dollars. I wouldn't even know where to begin if I were tasked with preparing a permit.

Wednesday, August 21, 2019

Random Look At Status Of Permits Issued In 2012 -- August 21, 2019

The other day a reader commented about the number of permits that are canceled in any given year.

For 2012, this is what my data shows. It will be different than the NDIC data but it was taken from the NDIC scout tickets.

There were 2,521 permits issued in 2012. [Again, this is my data; it will differ from the NDIC data but I doubt it will differ by much.]

Of those 2,521 permits, 2,111 had an IP.   Five additional ones had production but no IP provided.

Permits designated as "PNC" (permit now canceled): 304 (12%).

Other categories:
  • DUCs (SI/NC): 16
  • conf: still on confidential list -- 36
  • loc: still with permit only -- no activity -- 8
  • dry: 27
  • PA (permanently abandoned): 5 
  • TA (temporarily abandoned; generally will go to permanently abandoned): 12
  • WI: 6 (generally Madison wells)
I would assume that many of the wells still listed as conf / loc will eventually become PNC

Again, this is my data taken from NDIC scout tickets. It was done very quickly, not triple-checked, and there will be typographical and factual errors. If this is important to you, go to the source.


Saturday, December 22, 2012

On Track for 2,514 Oil And Gas Permits in 2012

Updates

December 31, 2012: "we" finished the year with 2,521 permits (some were canceled). 

Original Post

Oil and gas permits (not including salt water disposal wells), as of December 21, 2012: 2,494.

That puts "us" on track for 2,564 new oil and gas permits for 2012 if straight-lined.

With the holidays coming on, the number of new permits for 2012 will probably be closer to 2,514. So, we'll see. 
My database showed the following number of permits (may or may not include salt water disposal wells for years prior to 2012):
  • 2012: 2,521
  • 2011: 1,940
  • 2010: 1,684 
  • 2009: 629
  • 2008: 956
  • 2007: 497
  • 2006: 422

Thursday, November 29, 2012

Random Update of North Dakota Wells on Confidential Status

Disclaimer: numbers could be in error; done pretty quickly; but probably pretty close.

Wells on confidential status:
  • November 29, 2012: 2,117
  • November 20, 2012: 2,049
  • October 11, 2012: 1,872
EOG wells on confidential status:
  • November 29, 2012: 28
  • January 17, 2011: 66
  • March 14, 2010: 39
  • February 5, 2010: 54
  • January 24, 2010: 60
  • December 11, 2009: 83
  • October 20, 2009: 79 
Other selected operators:
  • Baytex: 11
  • BEXP: 204
  • Burlington Resources: 102
  • CLR: 271
  • Hess: 190
  • KOG: 97
  • OAS: 39
  • XTO: 77
  • Whiting: 51

Tuesday, November 20, 2012

Director's Cut Is Out: What Slowdown? Permitting At All-Time High By a Huge Margin; With Ten Less Rigs --> Production Up By Almost 4 Percent; Growth Exceeding Capacity to Capture Natural Gas

Updates

Later, 12:31 pm: a closer look at permitting. Mr Helms says that the pace of permitting has increased due to a) multi-well pads; and, b) winter coming. The record number of permits, 245, set in November, 2010, was beat by a new permitting record this past summer, July, 2012, with 266 permits. In October, that record was shattered (see below): the new record for permitting in North Dakota was set in October, 2012, with 370 permits. This new record of 370 absolutely shatters all previous records, just as the pace of permitting has increased significantly over the past six months.

Original Post
Link here.

Oil
  • Sept: 728,494 bopd (preliminary, all-time high)
  • Aug: 701,409 bopd
Producing wells
  • Sept: 7,798 (preliminary, all-time high) --> 93 bbls/well/day might be a record high, also
  • Aug: 7,701
Permitting
  • Oct: 370 (new all-time high) -- 36% increase over September
  • Sept: 273
  • Aug: 261
Pricing
  • Oct: $87/bbl
  • Sept: $85/bbl
  • Aug: $81/bbl
Rig count
  • Oct: 188
  • Sept: 190
  • Aug: 198
Same comment regarding fracking as usual: "...uncertainty surrounding future federal policies on hydraulic fracturing are impacting capital investment decisions."

Additions to gathering and processing capacity are helping but the percentage of gas flared rose slightly to 30%. The historical high as 36% in September, 2011 (again, flaring is a red herring). "Gas/oil ratios are increasing and confirms the need for more gathering and processing capacity. Construction of processing plants and gathering systems will not be affected by weather."

The NDIC approved (YESTERDAY) funding for researching flared gas to anhydrous ammonia fertilizer. Other research projects being considered.

Takeaway: 40% (rounded) by pipeline; 50% by rail; truck 2%; and Tesoro refinery, 8%.

"Drilling permit activity has increased dramatically to accommodate more multi-well pads and the need to build locations before winter."

The permitorium continues: "The number of rigs actively drilling on federal surface in the Dakota Prairie Grasslands is down to 5."

These are the concerns with the draft EPA proposal regarding diesel and fracking:
There are a significant number of concerns with the guidance as proposed, but the major points that should be commented on are as follows:
  • This is a state’s rights issue. States that have adopted hydraulic fracturing rules that include chemical disclosure, well construction, and well bore pressure testing should be explicitly exempted from the guidance. 
  • The definition of diesel fuel is too broad because it includes six CASRNs as well as any materials referred to by one of these primary names or any associated common synonyms. [Remember: the EPA re-defined "diesel" to include Newman's Own Salad Dressing, if I recall correctly, but I could be mistaken on this.]
  • EPA made no attempt to identify dangerous concentrations of these materials. Hydraulic fracturing treatments that utilize concentrations of less than 10% of any material defined as diesel fuel should be exempt from permitting requirements. 
  • The guidance is written for Enhanced Oil Recovery wells or disposal wells completed with tubing and packer. It shows a serious lack of understanding of the horizontal drilling-hydraulic fracturing process. Most of the requirements will not work mechanically on wells completed with swell packers and fractured down the production casing.

Saturday, October 13, 2012

On Track For 2,535 New Oil and Gas Permits for Calendar Year 2012

On October 6, 2012, I posted that at the rate of new permits being issued, North Dakota was on track for 2,459 new permits this calendar year.

Now, about a week later, as of October 12, 2012, North Dakota is now on track for 2,535 new permits this calendar year.

Back on June 1, 2012, I posted these stats:

My database showed the following number of permits (may or may not include salt water disposal wells):
  • 2012: 2,093 (est) -- based on 866 permits issued as of May 31, 2012
  • 2011: 1,940
  • 2010: 1,684 
  • 2009: 629
  • 2008: 956
  • 2007: 497
  • 2006: 422
The pace of permitting has increased significantly since June 1, 2012.

Saturday, October 6, 2012

Who Is Doing The Permitting In North Dakota?

As of October 5, these are the number of permits issued so far in 2012 for the following operators, and then farther down, by county:
Abraxas: 8
American Eagle: 11
Baytex: 16
BEXP: 179
BR: 63
CLR: 233
EOG: 44
Fidelity: 45
Hess: 179
Hunt: 27
KOG: 51
MRO: 50
Newfield: 23
Oasis: 70
OXY USA: 72
Petro-Hunt: 81
QEP: 23
Samson Resources: 47
Slawson: 51
SM Energy: 37
Triangle: 30
Whiting: 154
XTO: 53
By county:
Divide: 119
Dunn: 328
McKenzie: 558
Mountrail: 305
Stark: 73
Williams: 337
I don't know if there are any surprises in the list, except perhaps the aggressive BEXP permitting program. (Note: my data base and/or my counting could be off by one or two permits, but it's pretty close.)

On Track for 2,460 New Permits This Calendar Year, The Williston Basin, North Dakota

Just two days, I posted that at the rate of new permits being issued, North Dakota was on track for 2,439 new permits this calendar year.

One day later, with the report of 22 more permits, North Dakota is now on track for 2,459 new permits this calendar year.

Back on June 1, 2012, I posted these stats:
My database showed the following number of permits (may or may not include salt water disposal wells):
  • 2012: 2,093 (estimate) -- based on 866 permits issued as of May 31, 2012
  • 2011: 1,940
  • 2010: 1,684 
  • 2009: 629
  • 2008: 956
  • 2007: 497
  • 2006: 422
The pace of permitting has increased significantly since June 1, 2012.

Thursday, October 4, 2012

On Track For Nearly 2,450 Permits This Calendar Year, The Williston Basin, North Dakota, USA

I believe 1,851 permits for oil wells have been issued so far this year. This does not include permits for salt water disposal wells.

That would put the state on track for 2,439 permits for calendar year 2012.

Back on June 1, 2012, I posted these stats:
My database showed the following number of permits (may or may not include salt water disposal wells):
  • 2012: 2,093 (estimate) -- based on 866 permits issued as of May 31, 2012
  • 2011: 1,940
  • 2010: 1,684 
  • 2009: 629
  • 2008: 956
  • 2007: 497
  • 2006: 422
The pace of permitting has increased significantly since June 1, 2012.

Friday, June 1, 2012

On Track for Nearly 2,100 New Permits This Year in North Dakota

With 866 new permits issued through May 31 1, 2012, North Dakota is on track to issue 2,093 new permits this year.

My database showed the following number of permits (may or may not include salt water disposal wells):
  • 2012: 2,093 (estimate) -- based on 866 permits issued as of May 31, 2012
  • 2011: 1,940
  • 2010: 1,684 
  • 2009: 629
  • 2008: 956
  • 2007: 497
  • 2006: 422
Prior data. Numbers vary due to errors on my part. My numbers will be at slight variance with the NDIC because I occasionally miss a well, and salt water disposal wells may or may not be included. I don't know how the NDIC "counts" permits canceled shortly after they've been issued.
  • 2011: 1,940
  • 2010: 1,682
  • 2009: 628
  • 2008: 953
  • 2007: 497
  • 2006: 422

Wednesday, May 2, 2012

North Dakota: On Track For Nearly 2,100 New Permits in 2012

With 686 new permits issued through April 1, 2012, North Dakota is on track to issue 2,086 new permits this year.

My database showed the following number of permits (may or may not include salt water disposal wells):
  • 2012: 2,086 (estimate)
  • 2011: 1,940
  • 2010: 1,684 
  • 2009: 629
  • 2008: 956
  • 2007: 497
  • 2006: 422
Prior data. Numbers vary due to errors on my part. My numbers will be at slight variance with the NDIC because I occasionally miss a well, and salt water disposal wells may or may not be included. I don't know how the NDIC "counts" permits canceled shortly after they've been issued.
  • 2011: 1,940
  • 2010: 1,682
  • 2009: 628
  • 2008: 953
  • 2007: 497
  • 2006: 422
A Note to the Granddaughters

I think I mentioned earlier how much I am enjoying The Campaigns of Alexander: The Landmark Arrian, edited by James Romm, c. 2010.

I don't recall ever reading this much about Alexander the Great until reading this book. And until now, I've never really had a great appreciation for Alexander. His "greatness" and successes cannot be overstated. It is interesting to see why he succeeded.

Some disjointed, miscellaneous thoughts:

1. Mano o mano was in his blood. 

2. For Alexander, it was all about another conquest.

3. He was fast, but not brash, not rash. Of all his tactical military skills, his lightning speed stands out the most. His organization and employment of his cavalry and infantry is incredible, and I see the long green line from his methods to those used by the US Army today (as I learned in Air War College, USAF). He was most adept at deploying his units in new and unconventional ways. See number 9 below.

4. Strategically and tactically he excelled.

5. It was amazing how fast he marched his troops, but he knew when to rest them. His men must have worshipped him as a god, doing anything he requested, no matter how impossible, how difficult.

6. He was extremely magnanimous, often rewarding his "enemy" if he had fought well.

7. I found it incredible how many serious injuries he suffered; survived. He was at the front of/with his men going into battle.

8. I found it incredible how he could command hundreds of thousands of troops. He used runners, fires, closely spaced "human radios."

9. In the battle with King Poros this jumped out: at one point, Alexander's army was in a bit of difficulty. Without his orders, his men -- and we're talking tens of thousands -- took it upon themselves to "fall back" (not retreat; but to take stock of the situation), and re-organize ("unity of command, delegation of authority"). Much more could be written about this.

If one had only enough time / interest to read one battle waged by Alexander, I would recommend his successful battle with King Poros, in the area of the modern day Punjab, Pakistan: pages 197 to 221, beginning with:
In the country Alexander invaded between the River Kophen and the Indus, a city known as Nysa was said to have been settled. The city was said to have been founded by Dionysos after he had subdued the Indians -- whoever that Dionysos may have been, and whenever and from wherever he made war on the Indians.
The writer (Arrian) talks about how Alexander had his men take apart their boats, and reconstruct them under cover of night in a new location; how incredibly clever their pontoon bridges were; how he floated men AND HORSES across a raging river on sewn hides filled with hay. Can you imagine the site of horses floating on hay-filled bags made of hide? He understood the fear horses have of elephants (Indian elephants in this case) and how he responded. In the end, the Indian elephants caused greater damage to his enemy than to Alexander. After a hard fought battle in which he was nearly fatally injured, Alexander was so impressed with his adversary's officership and ability as a war-fighting general, that he had his men catch up with King Poros. They were instructed to bring King Poros back to Alexander which he did.
Alexander spoke first and urged Poros to say what he hoped would befall him. Poros is said to have replied, "Treat me like a king, Alexander."

"Pleased with the response, Alexander said, "that will be done, Poros, on my own account. But on your account, say what would be to your liking."

Poros replied that everything was contained in that wish. And Alexander, even more pleased with this repsonse, granted Poros sovereignty over the very Indians he had been ruling and added another territory even more extensive than his former domain. Thus he had treated a brave man like a king, and thereafetr enjoyed the man's unswerving loyalty.
I have come to many forks in the roads of my life, and many, many coming-of-age experiences, but one of the most important for me was taking Latin from Mr Becker in eighth grade, or thereabouts. His enthusiasm was truly infectious; from that year on, I never forgot how much I enjoyed reading Greek and Roman history, and develop a love for philology, although I doubt many could have a more difficult time with languages than I have.

I hope you both get the chance to take a year of Latin from a "live" instructor, and not just on-line. Latin is not just the language, but the literature and the history. One needs an instructor bigger than life to bring Latin to life.

Wednesday, February 1, 2012

Permits in January, 2012 -- The Williston Basin, North Dakota, USA

I recorded 168 permits issued by the NDIC for the month of January, 2012. That puts us on track for about 2,000 new permits this year.

By producer:
  • CLR: 18 new permits
  • Whiting: 13 new permits
By county:
  • Dunn: 34
  • McKenzie: 37
  • Mountrail: 34
  • Stark: 10
  • Williams: 34
There is a lot of talk of expiring leases this year, now that we are into the fifth year of this Bakken boom, which I say started in 2007.  I am sure we will start to see anecdotal evidence of this but in the big scheme of things it won't amount to much.

Every day, I update my data base of wells reporting IPs. I generally do not have to open up the database of permits in 2009 (or before). Most of the updates are for permits issued in 2011 and in 2010, and even those in the latter are dwindling in number. It is very, very unusual to have to open up the 2009 database to record a new well.

Operators appear to be very "current" on their permits.