Thursday, May 29, 2025

Costco Beats On Top Line And Bottom Line -- Doesn't Look Like A Recession To Me -- May 29, 2025

Locator: 48718COSTCO.

Costco: surges. Up 2.875; up $28.96; trading at $1,037.70. Still sells their hot dog combo for $1.50. Hasn't changed the price in decades. Decades. Later: up 3.75%; up $37.55; trading at $1,046.32. 

Link here.

  • Earnings per share: $4.28 vs. $4.24 expected
  • Revenue: $63.21 billion vs. $63.19 billion expected

Costco’s net income for the three-month period that ended May 11, 2025 rose to $1.90 billion, or $4.28 per share, compared with $1.68 billion, or $3.78 a year earlier. Revenue rose from $58.52 billion in the year-ago period. Comment: incredible numbers.

Comparable sales, an industry metric that takes out one-time factors such as store openings and closures, rose 8%, and e-commerce sales rose nearly 16% compared with the year-ago period, excluding gas and the impact of changes to foreign exchange.

Link here.

Hunt Oil To Drill More Oakland Wells In Parshall Oil Field -- One Of The "Original" Bakken Oil Fields -- Owned By EOG -- May 29, 2025

Locator: 48717B.

Hunt Oil looking to drill more Oakland wells (see daily activity report, May 29, 2025).

The map:

The wells:

  • 39288, SWD; Oakland 154-89-18 SWD 1;
  • 23930, loc/A, Hunt Oil, Oakland 2-18-19H, Parshall, t2/23; cum 292K 3/25;
  • 28847, PNC/A, Hunt Oil, Oakland 2-7-6H, Parshall, t2/23; cum 202K 3/25;
  • 17738, 1,476, Hunt Oil, Sauber 1-18H, Parshall, t5/09; cum 457K 3/25;
  • 41965, loc, sections 6/7; Hunt Oil, Oakland 154-89-7-6H-3, Parshall,
  • 41966, loc, sections 5/6/7/8; Hunt Oil, Oakland 154-89-7-6H-1, Parshall,
  • 41967, loc, sections 17/18/19/20; Hunt Oil, Oakland 154-89-17-19H-1, Parshall,
  • 41968, loc, sections 17/20; Hunt Oil, Oakland 154-89-17-20H-1, Parshall,
  • 18076, 680, Hunt Oil, Sauber 1-17H, Parshall, t6/09; cum 345K 3/25;
  • 17951, 251, Hunt Oil, Oakland 5-16H, Parshall, t6/10; cum 94K 3/25;
  • 18010, 1,271, EOG, Austin 30-13H, Parshall, t5/10; cum 507K 3/25;
  • 17290, 1,017, Hunt Oil, Horst 1-19H, Parshall, t6/09; cum 360K 3/25;
  • 17301, 482, Hunt Oil, Oakland 1-20H, Parshall, t9/09; cum 275K 3/25;
  • 40891, loc, sections 20/29; Hunt Oil, Oakland 154-89-20-29H-1, Parshall,
  • 40892, loc, sections 7/18; Hunt Oil, Oakland 154-89-18-7H-1, Parshall,
  • 17543, 450, EOG, Oakland 4-21H, Parshall, t10/10; cum 161K 3/25;

Answering A Reader's Question: How/Why Does A Reader Receive Royalties From A Phoenix Operating Jacobson Well? -- May 29, 2025

Locator: 48716B.

A reader wrote to tell me he/she received division orders for this well:

  • 40998, drl/A, Phoenix Operating, Jacobson 19-30-31-1H LLR, Burg, t11/24; cum 70K 3/25, production to date:
PoolDateDaysBBLS OilRunsBBLS WaterMCF ProdMCF SoldVent/Flare
BAKKEN3-20253119585196785535322344204480
BAKKEN2-20252312237119304393411951103020
BAKKEN1-20252917584176956200916417154680
BAKKEN12-20243119363193278919733676324429198
BAKKEN11-2024413541157137608310727
BAKKEN7-20240000000
BAKKEN6-20240000000

The reader does not have minerals in this section where the well is sited -- NENW 19-160-98 (note the township), 310 FNL 2332 FWL.

So, how does the reader fit into this story?

It turns out the reader has minerals in the drilling unit to the west: section 24-160-99 (note the township).

So, how does the reader participate in a well sited to the east, in a completely different township?

It turns out that the Phoenix Operating Jacobson well is a section line well with takes oil from both sides of the section line including oil from section 24-160-99 where the reader has minerals.

Wow.

The reader has one existing well in this drilling unit and is receiving royalties from that well. Interestingly, that well is a Petro-Hunt well, and not a Phoenix Operating well.

The existing, older Petro-Hunt well is this one:

  • 31468, 140, Petro-Hunt, Herland 14-12HS, Burg, t2/16; cum 146K 3/25; sited in SESW 12-160-99, 485 FSL 2300 FWL, and has been producing since February, 2016. The well is a long horizontal and is in a drilling unit consisting of sections 13 and 24 (the reader has minerals in section 24-160-99; recent production:
PoolDateDaysBBLS OilRunsBBLS WaterMCF ProdMCF SoldVent/Flare
BAKKEN3-20253055048515706442562
BAKKEN2-20252852847515305712060
BAKKEN1-20253062370517836352420
BAKKEN12-202431731727205967122625
BAKKEN11-20243097596221007350329
BAKKEN10-202431747705339558530149

So the reader clearly has minerals in section in section 24-160-99, the Petro-Hunt Herland well for which he/she is receiving royalties.

Now, because the Jacobson well is a line section well, he/she will receive royalties from that one Jacobson well but not from the other Jacobson wells on that pad. 

One can stop reading here, but here are the maps.

This is the overview map and may be the most confusing of the maps:

This map zooms in a bit. It shows more closely the relationship between the Phoenix Operating Jacobson line section well and the Petro-Hunt Herland well.

This doesn't show much except the Petro-Hunt Herland well that runs south into section 24-160-99 where the reader has minerals.

This map shows the same thing as the maps above, but zooms in.

Update: Sempra's Port Arthur LNG Phase 2 -- Approved -- Biden's Pause Has Come To A Stop -- Another Trump Win -- May 29, 2025

Locator: 48715LNG.

The project at this link. Once completed, this webpage will probably disappear.

Link here

Sempra said Thursday the U.S. Department of Energy issued a permit allowing its Port Arthur LNG Phase 2 development project in Texas to export of up to ~13.5M metric tons/year of liquefied natural gas to markets in Europe and Asia. 

The Phase 2 project is expected to include two liquefaction trains capable of producing ~13M metric tons/year of LNG, which would increase the total liquefaction capacity of the Port Arthur LNG facility from 13M tons/year for Phase 1, which is currently under construction, to as much as 26M tons/year. 

Port Arthur LNG Phase 2, which still needs a final investment decision, is expected to export 1.91B cf/day once completed; Phase 1 is expected to begin exporting LNG in 2027. Based on the graphic below, it suggests Phase 1 is / was ahead of schedule.

Phase 2 is the first final LNG export approval under President Trump, who reversed the Biden administration's pause on project approvals.

From May 14, 2025: link here.

The Enerplus Eggplant Pad

Locator: 48714B.

From the May 23, 2025, daily activity report.

Permits: #41950 - #41954, inclusive.

Operator: Enerplus.

The wells, NWSW 14-148-93; to be sited 1351 / 1463 FSL and 536 / 665 FWL.

The wells:

  • 41950, loc, Enerplus, MHA Eggplant 4893 31-14 3B, South Fork, Dunn County;
  • 41951, loc, Enerplus, MHA Quinoa 4893 31-14 4T, South Fork, Dunn County;
  • 41952, loc, Enerplus, MHA Tomatillo 4893 31-14 5B, South Fork, Dunn County;
  • 41953, loc, Enerplus, MHA Alfalfa 4893 31-14 6B, South Fork, Dunn County;
  • 41954, loc, Enerplus, MHA Sunflowers 4893 31-14 7B, South Fork, Dunn County;

The maps:

Five New Permits -- Thursday, May 29, 2025

Locator: 48713B.

Uinta Basin Railway: finally, some adulting in the room. And it was unanimous. Link here. Also, reported in The New York Times. This has to be a big story if it's being reported by TNYT.

The U.S. Supreme Court has given the green light to Utah’s Uinta Basin Railway project, backing a narrower interpretation of environmental review laws and potentially clearing the path for a major expansion in oil transport capacity.

In a unanimous decision Thursday, the justices reversed a lower court ruling, slamming it for what they described as an overly expansive and intrusive interpretation of environmental law. The line would link the Uinta Basin’s oil fields—tucked deep in northeastern Utah’s sagebrush terrain—to the national rail network, unlocking access to Gulf Coast and West Coast refineries.

At the heart of the case was how far federal agencies must go under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) to evaluate ripple effects—like emissions from oil refining or increased drilling—when considering infrastructure projects.
Writing for the court, Justice Brett Kavanaugh affirmed that federal agencies have discretion to weigh environmental impacts as they see fit, pushing back on calls for broader reviews that include downstream effects like refining emissions or increased oil consumption.

“Simply stated, NEPA is a procedural cross-check, not a substantive roadblock. The goal of the law is to inform agency decision-making, not to paralyze it,” Justice Kavanaugh said in the ruling. 

OPEC. Link here.

****************************
Back to the Bakken

WTI: $60.94.

Active rigs: 33.

Five new permits, #41964 - #41968, inclusive:

  • Operators: Hunt Oil (4); Petro-Hunt
  • Fields: Parshall (Mountrail); Tioga (Mountrail)
  • Comments:
    • Petro-Hunt has a permit for a Lovdahl well, SESE 32--158-94, 
      • to be sited 221 FSL and 1244 FEL;
    • Hunt Oil has permits for four Oakland wells, NWW 17-154-98, 
      • to be sited 353 FNL and 780 / 870 FWL.

Six permits renewed:

  • CLR: Berlain, Patent Gate oil field (2); Olympia, Brooklyn oil field (2); and, Charleston, Brooklyn oil field (2).

Rants And Raves -- May 29, 2025

Locator: 48712R&R. 

Streaming? Hulu + Amazon Prime is as good a combo as you will ever get. I assume YouTube TV+ and Amazon Prime is just as good.

Actually this is a huge story, surprisingly enough. There's a "breaking news" crawler over at CNBC and a headline story that can be found everywhere.

This speaks volumes about the current state of affairs in Washington, DC, and confirms that President Donald Trump, the most activist president since FDR, lives rent-free in Chairman JPow's brain. LOL. 

When you have to remind folks that your "independent" agency has decided for the first time ever -- apparently -- that it is making a change in their philosophy / policy statement -- that now, the Fed will make decisions based on "non-political" analysis, confirming that they had been making decisions based on "political analysis" in the past. At least that's how I interpret these statements. Glad to see that JPow is taking politics out of the Fed's decision-making process. LOL. And if you believe that, JPow can probably find a bridge or two to sell you.

I guess this is why the market went from solid green earlier today to solid red this afternoon. It's always bad news when one makes policy decisions without considering the political environment / political fallout. Even presidents of the United States know that.

International students getting top eduction in the US: I'm not sure why Trump wouldn't monetize that, under the arguments that every one of these top universities obtains a huge amount of federal funding in any number of ways. 

I would suggest that tuition and fees for international students would be 3x the tuition and fees for in-state US students and that the funds greater than the base tuition be paid to the US government. 

The future of the filibuster. If there is no future, thank Harry Reid. Link here. This is going to work to President Trump's advantage. Trust me on this one.

******************************
Tortillas

A two-page essay on tortillas in the current issue of The New Yorker, June 2, 2025.

Link here

Perhaps written by a young Jewish woman based in New York City.

I love this article for many reasons. You can "count them" in the lede:

As a kid growing up in Hermosillo, the biggest city in the arid northern Mexican state of Sonora, Ruben Leal took the region’s signature flour tortillas for granted. You could find them not only in tortillerias—where veteran makers would flip them, sometimes bare-handed, on a ripping-hot comal—but also at any of the city’s abbarotes, or corner stores, where “they have fresh ones that the tortilla lady dropped off early in the morning,” Leal told me. Tortillas de harina, made with freshly milled wheat and pork fat or vegetable shortening, were essential for staples like tacos, burritos, and caramelos—a Sonoran quesadilla made with carne asada—but they were also delicious enough to eat plain.

My go-to homemade luncheon meal is a burrito made on a very soft tortilla. 

The second paragraph:

In 2002, Leal moved to Tucson, where he studied marketing at the University of Arizona and met the woman he would marry. They moved to Austin, where Leal got his tortilla fix at the Texas grocery chain H-E-B, which makes them fresh. A few years later, the couple moved again, this time to Lawrence, Kansas, a college town some forty miles west of Kansas City, not far from where Leal’s wife grew up. The area’s Mexican population is relatively small, and the dish known as the “Kansas City taco” is a mid-century relic: a deep-fried, hard corn shell with ground beef, shredded lettuce, and cheese powder. “I kept getting farther away from the border and the tortillas kept getting worse,” Leal told me recently, standing in the Lawrence headquarters of his company, Caramelo, which has lately emerged as one of the best producers of tortillas in the U.S.
So, we'll see. More later.

**************************
Taxes

After paying my Federal taxes this year, I am so thankful I don't live in California.

Texas has no state income taxes.

No estate taxes. No inheritance taxes. Nada. Nil. Zilch. $0.

Barbershop On The Balcony -- May 29, 2025

Locator: 48711ARCHIVES.

The last time I had a haircut in a barbershop was in February / March, 2020, just before everything closed down due to the Covid pandemic. From that day on, Sophia was my barber.

Earlier this week, a small trim.

By the way, we just bought Sophia an expensive, high-end, authentic electric hair clipper used by professional barbers and also an authentic pair of scissors exclusively for cutting hair.


 

Nvidia -- 1Q26 -- Updates Continue -- May 29, 2025

Locator: 48710NVDA.
Locator: 48710CUDA.

Update

May 29, 2025: from Shay today. A very, very long note. This is the first little bit: 

The real story from Nvidia earnings wasn’t the revenue beat. It wasn’t the guide. It wasn’t even the China write-down. It was the $4.96B in networking revenue.

That number -- blowing past the $3.45B estimate -- is the loudest signal we’ve gotten yet that the center of gravity in AI compute has shifted. Not away from Nvidia, but within it. From training to inference. From chip to system. 

This is the regime change the market hasn’t fully priced: inference isn’t a tail-end workload anymore. It’s becoming the default mode of AI at scale. And the economics, the architecture, the physical infrastructure of that shift all tilt back toward one conclusion -- this isn’t about GPUs alone. This is about the pipes. The fabric. The connective tissue. And right now, Nvidia owns that, too.
What they’re building isn’t a product line. It’s a substrate. Blackwell isn’t just replacing Hopper -- it’s replacing the idea that AI progress happens in discrete steps. When 70% of data center compute revenue already comes from a chip architecture launched just months ago, that’s not a product cycle. That’s cadence. And the fact that $MSFT has already deployed tens of thousands of GB200s with plans to scale to hundreds of thousands means this isn’t theoretical demand. It’s committed capital. It’s forward-positioned infrastructure. It’s factory-scale deployments being rolled out to meet the explosion in real-world token usage -- 100 trillion tokens processed in a single quarter. A 5x YoY surge. 
You don’t build for that with old assumptions. You build with bandwidth. With latency minimization. With full-stack integration from silicon to rack. Which is why Nvidia’s networking business didn’t just outperform -- it became the heartbeat of the AI factory model. Spectrum-X, NVLink, custom interconnects -- they’re no longer supplementary. They’re elemental.

And here’s where the impact spills out to the rest of the ecosystem. Because once the market wakes up to inference at scale, it doesn’t just re-rate Nvidia. It elevates every company within the stack.

Start with AVGO. You don’t move trillions of tokens per quarter without silicon photonics, custom switch ASICs, and hardened firmware stacks that Broadcom dominates. Their position inside META, MSFT, GOOGL & AMZN networking is no longer optional -- it’s foundational. The scale Nvidia just outlined will require not just horizontal expansion, but vertical reengineering of every signal pathway in the data center. And Broadcom is already embedded in those redesigns.

Original Post

CUDA: an acronym used in computing, closely associated with Nvidia. Nothing to do with the publicly traded company Barracuda whose stock symbol is CUDA.

Reminder, FUD: fear, uncertainty, doubt. 

From Shay this morning, link here:

The market keeps circling the same question: will China be the thing that derails Nvidia? Will Huawei catch up? Will export controls cripple growth?
Here’s the truth -- Nvidia isn’t reliant on China. It’s moving past it.
Yes, the hit was real: an $8B drag from the H20 export ban and related write-downs. But even with that, Nvidia guided to $28B for Q2 -- in line with the sell-side, and $2B ahead of where the buyside was modeling.
And yet, the headlines keep coming. Huawei’s building custom chips. A Blackwell killer is on the way. Nvidia’s lead is narrowing. But this was never about specs on paper -- it’s about systems, architecture, and above all, CUDA. Let’s be real: GOOGL, MSFT, META, and AMZN -- with bottomless R&D budgets -- haven’t replaced CUDA (see at very end of this post).
TSLA, AAPL, ORCL all tried building in-house stacks. None succeeded.
But somehow, Huawei -- under sanctions, locked out of TSMC and ASML -- is going to not only match Nvidia’s hardware but rebuild its software ecosystem from scratch? I call BS.
Even if they match on silicon -- and they haven’t -- they’re still a generation behind on the compiler. On the optimization. On the ecosystem that makes the system run. That’s why even the most vertically integrated hyperscalers still buy tens of thousands of GB200 Superchips. Because nothing else scales like Nvidia. This isn’t about whether Nvidia can survive without China -- it’s about how long the market will keep pretending China is even in the race.

***********************************
Original Post

The AI ramp -- the sixth industrial revolution -- I honestly don't think -- in terms of dollars -- in the private sector --  being spent in one sector -- anyone has ever seen this before -- except perhaps with tulips, February, 1637.  Example, MSFT / NVDA, link here.

Disclaimer
Brief Reminder 

 Briefly:

  • I am inappropriately exuberant about the Bakken and I am often well out front of my headlights. I am often appropriately accused of hyperbole when it comes to the Bakken.
  • I am inappropriately exuberant about the US economy and the US market.
  • I am also inappropriately exuberant about all things Apple. 
  • See disclaimer. This is not an investment site. 
  • Disclaimer: this is not an investment site. Do not make any investment, financial, job, career, travel, or relationship decisions based on what you read here or think you may have read here. All my posts are done quickly: there will be content and typographical errors. If something appears wrong, it probably is. Feel free to fact check everything.
  • If anything on any of my posts is important to you, go to the source. If/when I find typographical / content errors, I will correct them. 
  • Reminder: I am inappropriately exuberant about the Bakken, US economy, and the US market.
  • I am also inappropriately exuberant about all things Apple. 
  • And now, Nvidia, also. I am also inappropriately exuberant about all things Nvidia. Nvidia is a metonym for AI and/or the sixth industrial revolution.
  • I've now added Broadcom to the disclaimer. I am also inappropriately exuberant about all things Broadcom.
  • I've now added Oracle to the disclaimer. I am also inappropriately exuberant about all things Oracle.
  • Longer version here.  

****************************************
Nvidia

App economy, link here:

Data center revenue, link here:

Pre-market:
  • P/E down to 43
  • market cap: $3.3 trillion

 *****************************
Previously Posted

May 28, 2025, 4:02 p.m. CT: and now that this is over, I'm done with CNBC and following the market for another three months when AAPL and NVDA report again. Good luck to all. After hours

  • the big four after Nvidia's earnings:
    • NVDA: $142.47, up $7.66, up 5.68%;
    • ORCL: $166.50, up $2.65, up 1.62%;
    • AVGO: $247.16, up $7.79; up 3.25%;
    • AMD: $114.89, up $2.03; up 1.75%;
  • others;
    • ARM: $139.22, up $3.68; up 2.72%
    • TSM: $200.40, up $.26; up 2.17%
    • GEV: $499.00 -- all-time high; up $13.99; up 2.88%; 
    • MU: $98.00; up $1.87; up 1.94% (was slightly down during the day)
    • AMD up a bit
    • AAPL: flat -- not a good sign for AAPL

And here they are, earnings:

  • ticker up $2.00 after hours and after earnings have apparently been released; now up over $3.00 / share -- is that good news? Maybe.
  • seems to have settled: up 3.5% after earnings release. 
  • later, after "everyone" has had chance to see the numbers and heard Jensen's comments, NVID is up over $8 / share; up about 6%;
  • CNBC :
    • beat on top and bottom line
    • 96 cents vs 93 cents EPS
    • $44.06 billion vs $43.31 billion
  • $4.5 billion charge vs $5.0 billion charge
  • $39.1 billion from data center services revenue; slightly ight; vs 39.22 billion estimate -- the crawler on CNBC is wrong (it will probably be corrected).
  • "ticker is now popping." But not by much. Up over 4% after hours. 
  • Investopedia. Link here.
  • Business Insider. Link here.
  • FIRST QUARTER RESULTS
    Revenue $44.06 billion, +69% y/y, estimate $43.29 billion
    - Data center revenue $39.1 billion, +73% y/y, estimate $39.22
    billion
    - Automotive revenue $567 million, +72% y/y, estimate $579.4
    million
    - Adjusted gross margin 61% vs. 78.9% y/y, estimate 71%
    -R&D expenses $3.99 billion, +47% y/y, estimate $4.07 billion
    - Adjusted operating expenses $3.58 billion, +43% y/y, estimate
    $3.63 billion
    - Adjusted operating income $23.28 billion, +29% y/y, estimate
    $27.15 billion
    - Adjusted EPS 81c, estimate 93c
    - Free cash flow $26.14 billion, +75% y/y

Comments

Bad:

  • most worrisome: margins, big miss, and significantly lower than previous
  • operating income missed estimate but still up 29% y/y

Nice:

  • operating expenses, though significantly higher than y/y, came in lower than estimate

Analysts:

  • able to keep up with supply chain; meeting buyers' demands.
  • remember: Nvidia has been locked out of China and yet they made their numbers. 

Will be interesting to see the App Economy graphic.

Update

May 28, 2025: Beth says Nvidia will generate $1 trillion in cumulative revenue through fiscal 2029.

May 28, 2025
: First time in months that I've tuned into CNBC. Anticipating Nvidia earnings today.

  • Observations:
    • analysts are over-thinking this; LOL;
    • today is sort of like the Stanley Cup of trading; NBA championships of trading; nothing more, nothing less;
    • wow, talk about endless talking about nothing that matters;

May 28, 2025: the Trump administration orders US companies that offer software used to design semiconductors to stop selling their services to Chinese groups

We'll start seeing stories everywhere. The big question is whether these announcements are simply things that Trump has come up with or if there is some discussion among his inner group? If the former, Trump will run circles around bureaucracies and the judicial system. Again, can the president simply issue edicts like this? It will take days / weeks / months / years for the legislative and the judicial branches of the government to consider these issues.

May 28, 2025: Palantir goes deeper into the US bureaucracy -- has now teamed up with Fannie Mae to fight mortgage fraud.

May 27, 2025: earnings out tomorrow, Wednesday, May 28, 2025, after market closes. 

May 24, 2025link here.

May 24, 2025: analysts' expectations, Investopedia.

Analysts on average expect Nvidia to report: 

  • quarterly revenue of $43.38 billion, 66% higher year-over-year; and, 
  • adjusted net income of $21.29 billion, or 87 cents per share, up from $15.24 billion, or 61 cents per share, a year earlier. 

Original Post 

****************************************
Previously Posted

Locator: 48478NVDA.

All about tech, right now. 

Most important: AAPL, NVID, CRM.

Apple (AAPL) news here. (pending) 

Over on twitter: Evan, Giovanni Staunovo, and EconomyApp.

Start here

First two charts, Nvidia, link here:

  • 2Q25: look at those incredible margins and other data points, from left to right:
    • largest revenue center, "Data Center": $26.3 billion; grew 16% q/q
    • revenue: $30.08 billion; grew 15% q/q 
    • gross profit: $22.6 billion; grew 3pp q/q; 75% margin;
    • operating profit: $18.6billion; grew 3pp q/q; 62% margin;
    • net profit: $16.6 billion; grew 2pp q/q; 55% margin;

From yesterday:

  • 1Q25: look at those incredible margins and other data points, from left to right:
    • largest revenue center, "Data Center": $22.6 billion; grew 23% q/q
    • revenue: $26.08 billion; grew 18% q/q 
    • gross profit: $20.4 billion; grew 2pp q/q; 78% margin;
    • operating profit: $16.9 billion; grew 3pp q/q; 65% margin;
    • net profit: $14.9 billion; grew 2pp q/q; 75% margin; 

Salesforcelink here: 

  • 2Q25: compare CRM margins below with NVDA margins above (spoiler alert: there's simply no comparison) and other data points, from left to right: 
    • subscription and support: $8.8 billion; grew 9% y/y;
      • five revenue centers: each $1 billion to $2 billion; each grew about 10% y/y;
    • revenue: $9.3 billion; grew 8% q/q 
    • gross profit: $7.2 billion; grew 1pp q/q; 77% margin;
    • operating profit: $1.88 billion; grew 2pp q/q; 19% margin;
    • net profit: $1.4 billion; grew 1pp q/q; 15% margin; 

Now, conventional comparison, CRM vs NVDA:

CRM, p/e = 46.54

NVDA, forward p/e = 40; current p/e = 74:

NVDA vs CRM

Summary of Nvidia's Earnings Call 

Link here

Positives: - Record Revenue Growth: NVIDIA reported a record revenue of $30 billion for Q2, a 15% sequential increase and a remarkable 122% year-on-year growth, significantly surpassing the expected $28 billion. - Strong Data Center Performance: Data Center revenue reached $26.3 billion, up 16% sequentially and 154% year-on-year, driven by robust demand for NVIDIA's Hopper architecture and networking platforms, particularly in generative AI applications. - Innovative Product Pipeline: The anticipation for the upcoming Blackwell platform is high, with expectations of several billion dollars in revenue from Blackwell in Q4. The platform promises significant improvements in performance and efficiency. - Diverse Customer Base: NVIDIA's customer base is expanding, with strong demand from cloud service providers, consumer internet companies, and enterprises across various sectors, including healthcare and automotive. - Growing Software Revenue: NVIDIA's AI Enterprise platform is gaining traction, with expectations to approach a $2 billion annual run rate by year-end, indicating strong growth in software and services.

Negatives: - Gross Margin Pressure: Gross margins decreased slightly due to a higher mix of new products and inventory provisions for low-yielding Blackwell materials, with expectations of continued pressure as new products ramp up. - Competitive Market in China: While Data Center revenue in China grew, the market remains competitive, and NVIDIA faces challenges due to export controls affecting its operations in the region. - Increased Operating Expenses: Operating expenses are expected to grow in the mid- to upper 40% range as NVIDIA invests in developing next-generation products, which may impact profitability in the short term. - Transition Challenges: The shift from Hopper to Blackwell may present challenges in terms of customer readiness and integration, particularly with the adoption of liquid cooling technologies.  

Overall: NVIDIA's earnings call highlighted strong financial performance and growth prospects driven by innovation in AI and accelerated computing, while also acknowledging challenges related to margins and competitive pressures.

 ****************************
CUDA

AI Overview

In the context of investing, CUDA is strongly associated with NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA). It stands for Compute Unified Device Architecture. 

CUDA is a parallel computing platform and application programming interface (API) model developed by NVIDIA. It enables developers to use NVIDIA's graphics processing units (GPUs) for general-purpose processing, also known as GPGPU (General-Purpose computing on Graphics Processing Units).

Its importance in investing stems from the fact that it has become the go-to platform for GPU acceleration, particularly in deep learning and AI applications. This is because:

  • Ease of use: CUDA provides a software layer that allows developers to easily access and utilize the parallel processing power of GPUs, making it easier for them to create complex programs and speed up compute-intensive applications.
  • Strong ecosystem: Over the years, a large developer community has built up around CUDA, leading to a wide range of software and applications that rely on it. This makes it difficult for users to switch to alternative GPU platforms, effectively creating a strong competitive advantage for NVIDIA.
  • Dominance in AI: CUDA's synergy with NVIDIA's GPUs has solidified the company's position as a dominant player in the AI industry, as it serves as the backbone for AI development and deployment. This makes NVIDIA an attractive investment in the growing AI market.

In summary, CUDA is a key factor behind NVIDIA's success and market dominance, particularly in the fields of AI and accelerated computing, which makes it an important consideration for investors looking into the technology sector.

Important Note: While CUDA is primarily associated with NVIDIA, Barracuda Networks, Inc. also uses the ticker symbol CUDA on the NYSE. Barracuda Networks is a company that provides security and data protection solutions. It is important to distinguish between the two entities when researching or discussing investments.

Apple -- Random Update -- May 29, 2025

Locator: 48709AAPL.

Disclaimer
Brief Reminder 

 Briefly:

  • I am inappropriately exuberant about the Bakken and I am often well out front of my headlights. I am often appropriately accused of hyperbole when it comes to the Bakken.
  • I am inappropriately exuberant about the US economy and the US market.
  • I am also inappropriately exuberant about all things Apple. 
  • See disclaimer. This is not an investment site. 
  • Disclaimer: this is not an investment site. Do not make any investment, financial, job, career, travel, or relationship decisions based on what you read here or think you may have read here. All my posts are done quickly: there will be content and typographical errors. If something appears wrong, it probably is. Feel free to fact check everything.
  • If anything on any of my posts is important to you, go to the source. If/when I find typographical / content errors, I will correct them. 
  • Reminder: I am inappropriately exuberant about the Bakken, US economy, and the US market.
  • I am also inappropriately exuberant about all things Apple. 
  • And now, Nvidia, also. I am also inappropriately exuberant about all things Nvidia. Nvidia is a metonym for AI and/or the sixth industrial revolution.
  • I've now added Broadcom to the disclaimer. I am also inappropriately exuberant about all things Broadcom.
  • I've now added Oracle to the disclaimer. I am also inappropriately exuberant about all things Oracle.
  • Longer version here.  

Apple iPhone

Link here.

Ticker, pre-market:

I doubt it will look this good at the end of the day. Generally, a lot of excitement pre-market which then fizzles out by the close.

Thursday -- May 29, 2025

Locator: 48708B.

WTI: $61.81

New wells:

  • Friday, May 30, 2025: 54 for the month, 154 for the quarter, 368 for the year,
    • 41202, conf, Silver Hill Energy Operating, Rooster W Federal 159-94-2-26-3MBHX,
    • 37577, conf, BR, Keene 21-2 TFH,
  • Thursday, May 29, 2025: 52 for the month, 152 for the quarter, 366 for the year,
    • 40792, conf, Phoenix Operating, Jacobson 19-30-31 4H,

RBN Energy: expected surge in turbine manufacturing complicated by rising costs, uncertain demand.

This may be the best time ever to be a manufacturer of natural gas turbines. The U.S. seems poised for a sharp increase in power demand in the coming years and order books are filling up, but it’s not all smooth sailing and significant headwinds remain. In today’s RBN blog, we will explore how rising costs, supply-chain constraints, long lead times and tariffs could impact turbine manufacturing and complicate efforts to expand gas-fired power generation. 

As we said recently in Only Happy When It Rains, there’s been a lot of talk recently about needing more electricity to meet the growing demands of electrification and data centers. Developers have been considering the full spectrum of power-generation sources — ranging from renewables to nuclear — but almost everyone understands that gas-fired plants will be a big part of the solution. A number of major gas producers and just about every big midstreamer with a gas pipeline network have been talking up their plans to serve these new power plants, and several gas-fired projects — many tied directly to data centers — have already been announced (see We Should Be Friends, Part 1 and Part 2). That has made acquiring the turbines needed to run a gas-fired power plant a priority — and a bigger challenge than it might appear.

In Part 1, we discussed the specialized and complex nature of gas turbine manufacturing and noted that while there are a host of manufacturers out there, there are three major players: GE Vernova, Mitsubishi Power and Siemens Energy. They all face a number of manufacturing challenges, including a complex and lengthy construction process, the need for metals and alloys that can be difficult to obtain, and the impact of new U.S. tariffs.

Manufacturing Challenges

We’ll get into how much it costs to build a turbine shortly, but let’s start with the overall manufacturing challenges. Gas turbines are comprised of thousands of individual parts and operate in oppressively hot environments, requiring advanced alloys that can withstand scorching temperatures. Steel, titanium, aluminum and nickel alloys all play crucial roles in turbine construction and have faced price volatility in recent years. For example, prices for the types of steel used in casings, rotors and structural supports have increased by more than 70% since 2020 and a number of across-the-board price hikes have contributed to a 10% rise in overall gas turbine prices compared to last year.