First months of production for this well, typical for a Bakken well in a great location:
Pool | Date | Days | BBLS | Runs | Water | MCF | MCF | V/F |
BAKKEN | 6-2009 | 27 | 11928 | 13282 | 443 | 5415 | 4988 | 297 |
BAKKEN | 5-2009 | 14 | 6871 | 5809 | 216 | 2688 | 1381 | 1254 |
BAKKEN | 4-2009 | 4 | 1906 | 1651 | 64 | 871 | 0 | 853 |
BAKKEN | 3-2009 | 28 | 11090 | 10787 | 409 | 5068 | 0 | 4932 |
BAKKEN | 2-2009 | 23 | 11203 | 11359 | 446 | 5082 | 0 | 4967 |
BAKKEN | 1-2009 | 23 | 13342 | 14524 | 677 | 6023 | 0 | 5912 |
BAKKEN | 12-2008 | 27 | 15672 | 15230 | 695 | 7298 | 0 | 7170 |
BAKKEN | 11-2008 | 28 | 20665 | 20731 | 1490 | 9372 | 0 | 9236 |
BAKKEN | 10-2008 | 25 | 13595 | 12937 | 1555 | 6137 | 0 | 6017 |
BAKKEN | 9-2008 | 23 | 13941 | 14908 | 2134 | 6424 | 0 | 6315 |
BAKKEN | 8-2008 | 30 | 20138 | 19283 | 1703 | 9923 | 0 | 9777 |
BAKKEN | 7-2008 | 17 | 19497 | 18086 | 9496 | 8998 | 0 | 8913 |
Later, this well was taken off-line for various reasons (but not due to fracking of neighboring wells) with this production profile. Note that this well did not appear to have any significant increase in production when it was taken off-line for a month or so and then brought back on-line. That is noted on two separate occasions below:
Pool | Date | Days | BBLS | Runs | Water | MCF | MDF | V/F |
BAKKEN | 4-2013 | 30 | 1974 | 2031 | 1210 | 2536 | 2041 | 345 |
BAKKEN | 3-2013 | 31 | 1869 | 1832 | 1620 | 816 | 661 | 0 |
BAKKEN | 2-2013 | 28 | 1475 | 1586 | 2148 | 659 | 519 | 0 |
BAKKEN | 1-2013 | 31 | 1558 | 1370 | 4637 | 569 | 416 | 0 |
BAKKEN | 12-2012 | 7 | 37 | 0 | 1214 | 45 | 12 | 0 |
BAKKEN | 11-2012 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
BAKKEN | 10-2012 | 9 | 768 | 919 | 245 | 370 | 181 | 144 |
BAKKEN | 9-2012 | 30 | 2462 | 2439 | 941 | 1192 | 1039 | 3 |
BAKKEN | 8-2012 | 26 | 2243 | 2263 | 1152 | 963 | 846 | 0 |
BAKKEN | 7-2012 | 31 | 1730 | 1757 | 1699 | 790 | 601 | 81 |
BAKKEN | 6-2012 | 9 | 446 | 379 | 1216 | 133 | 90 | 0 |
BAKKEN | 5-2012 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
BAKKEN | 4-2012 | 22 | 2506 | 2522 | 77 | 1294 | 1184 | 0 |
BAKKEN | 3-2012 | 31 | 4195 | 4229 | 204 | 2347 | 2192 | 0 |
BAKKEN | 2-2012 | 9 | 1703 | 1639 | 32 | 776 | 732 | 0 |
BAKKEN | 1-2012 | 30 | 3508 | 3505 | 104 | 2236 | 2091 | 0 |
BAKKEN | 12-2011 | 28 | 3625 | 3614 | 103 | 2207 | 2067 | 0 |
BAKKEN | 11-2011 | 30 | 3717 | 3728 | 113 | 2365 | 2215 | 0 |
BAKKEN | 10-2011 | 31 | 3963 | 3952 | 101 | 2431 | 2080 | 196 |
BAKKEN | 9-2011 | 30 | 3841 | 3895 | 175 | 2432 | 2258 | 25 |
Again, this well was taken off-line for two months or longer on two occasions and no jump in production was noted.
Now, note this production profile. Note the jump in production January, 2014. It was taken offline for a significant longer time than before (in the above production profile). Note, also the marked increase in water production after the well came back on line:
Pool | Date | Days | BBLS | Run | Water | MCF | MCF | V/F |
BAKKEN | 1-2015 | 31 | 3425 | 3496 | 481 | 1572 | 964 | 418 |
BAKKEN | 12-2014 | 28 | 3287 | 3216 | 507 | 941 | 409 | 364 |
BAKKEN | 11-2014 | 30 | 3766 | 3761 | 630 | 1384 | 968 | 232 |
BAKKEN | 10-2014 | 31 | 4073 | 4668 | 576 | 1486 | 326 | 970 |
BAKKEN | 9-2014 | 30 | 4214 | 3695 | 435 | 1559 | 6 | 1369 |
BAKKEN | 8-2014 | 31 | 4615 | 4605 | 821 | 1697 | 4 | 1540 |
BAKKEN | 7-2014 | 15 | 2073 | 2048 | 595 | 782 | 10 | 704 |
BAKKEN | 6-2014 | 30 | 5842 | 6174 | 2023 | 2294 | 43 | 2101 |
BAKKEN | 5-2014 | 31 | 5978 | 5615 | 2840 | 2461 | 1754 | 552 |
BAKKEN | 4-2014 | 30 | 5815 | 5841 | 3343 | 2536 | 2041 | 345 |
BAKKEN | 3-2014 | 31 | 5590 | 5564 | 3828 | 2589 | 2418 | 18 |
BAKKEN | 2-2014 | 28 | 6172 | 6183 | 5954 | 2680 | 2420 | 121 |
BAKKEN | 1-2014 | 31 | 7058 | 7089 | 8348 | 1894 | 878 | 861 |
BAKKEN | 12-2013 | 2 | 84 | 198 | 989 | 68 | 6 | 52 |
BAKKEN | 11-2013 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
BAKKEN | 10-2013 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
BAKKEN | 9-2013 | 15 | 2687 | 2546 | 1544 | 975 | 584 | 319 |
BAKKEN | 8-2013 | 8 | 798 | 775 | 1028 | 476 | 209 | 230 |
BAKKEN | 7-2013 | 16 | 1321 | 1237 | 282 | 434 | 354 | 0 |
BAKKEN | 6-2013 | 26 | 2136 | 2361 | 722 | 879 | 751 | 0 |
The screenshot where this well is located:
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.