|
Permit
|
Operator
|
County
|
Field
|
Satus
|
Name
|
Comments
|
|
31003
|
BR
|
McKenzie
|
Elidah
|
conf
|
Cleetwood 44-22MBH
|
|
|
31004
|
XTO
|
McKenzie
|
North Tobacco Garden
|
SI/NC
|
Rita 44X-34HXE
|
|
|
31005
|
QEP
|
McKenzie
|
Grail
|
prod
|
Henderson 36-25-35-26T2H
|
a big well; choked way back
|
|
31006
|
QEP
|
McKenzie
|
Grail
|
prod
|
Henderson 36-25-35-26BH
|
a big well; choked way back
|
|
31007
|
QEP
|
McKenzie
|
Grail
|
prod
|
Henderson 1-12-2-11BH
|
a big well; choked way back
|
|
31008
|
QEP
|
McKenzie
|
Grail
|
prod
|
Henderson 1-12-2-11T2H
|
a big well; choked way back
|
|
31009
|
EOG
|
Mountrail
|
Parshall
|
SI/NC
|
Shell 44-3239H
|
|
|
31010
|
EOG
|
Mountrail
|
Parshall
|
SI/NC
|
Shell 46-3229H
|
|
|
31011
|
Newfield
|
McKenzie
|
Westberg
|
1348
|
Wahus Federal 152-97-13-24-11H
|
t9/15; cum 39K 12/15;
|
|
31012
|
Newfield
|
McKenzie
|
Westberg
|
833
|
Wahus State 152-97-12-1-12H
|
t9/15; cum 43K 12/15;
|
|
31013
|
Newfield
|
McKenzie
|
Westberg
|
1348
|
Wahus Federal 152-97-13-24-4H
|
t9/15; cum 55K 12/15;
|
|
31014
|
WPX
|
Mountrail
|
Van Hook
|
702
|
Elk 17-20HE
|
t10/15; cum 37K 12/15;
|
|
31015
|
Hess
|
Mountrail
|
Alger
|
conf
|
EN-Abrahamson-LE-155-93-3019H-1
|
|
|
31016
|
Hess
|
Mountrail
|
Alger
|
conf
|
EN-Abrahamson-155-93-3019H-4
|
|
|
31017
|
Hess
|
Mountrail
|
Alger
|
conf
|
EN-Abrahamson-155-93-3019H-9
|
|
|
31018
|
EOG
|
Mountrail
|
Parshall
|
conf
|
Shell 40-3229H
|
|
|
31019
|
EOG
|
Mountrail
|
Parshall
|
SI/NC
|
Shell 42-3229H
|
|
|
31020
|
BR
|
McKenzie
|
North Fork
|
conf
|
Saddle Butte 14-9MTFH-ULW
|
|
|
31021
|
EOG
|
Mountrail
|
Parshall
|
conf
|
Shell 49-3231H
|
|
|
31022
|
EOG
|
Mountrail
|
Parshall
|
conf
|
Shell 48-3231H
|
|
|
31023
|
Whiting
|
Williams
|
East Fork
|
prod
|
P Berger 156-100-14-7-19-13H
|
a huge well;
|
|
31024
|
Whiting
|
Williams
|
East Fork
|
loc
|
P Berger 156-100-14-7-19-13H3
|
|
|
31025
|
Whiting
|
Williams
|
East Fork
|
prod
|
P Berger 156-100-14-7-19-14H
|
a huge well;
|
|
31026
|
Whiting
|
Williams
|
East Fork
|
loc
|
P Berger 156-100-14-7-19-14H3
|
|
|
31027
|
Hess
|
Mountrail
|
Robinson Lake
|
796
|
EN-Frandson-154-93-2116H-7
|
t10/15; cum 45K 12/15; only 8 days in 12/15
|
|
31028
|
Hess
|
Mountrail
|
Robinson Lake
|
596
|
EN-Franson-154-93-2116H-8
|
t10/15; cum 29K 12/15; only 17 days in 12/15
|
|
31029
|
Hess
|
Mountrail
|
Robinson Lake
|
578
|
EN-Frandson-154-93-2116H-9
|
t10/15; cum 20K 12/15; only 4 days in 12/15
|
|
31030
|
EOG
|
Mountrail
|
Parshall
|
SI/NC
|
Shell 52-1930H
|
|
|
31031
|
EOG
|
Mountrail
|
Parshall
|
SI/NC
|
Shell 6-1930H
|
|
|
31032
|
EOG
|
Mountrail
|
Parshall
|
SI/NC
|
Shell 5-1930H
|
|
|
31033
|
Statoil
|
Mountrail
|
Alger
|
SI/NC
|
Vachal 3-34 5TFH
|
|
|
31034
|
Statoil
|
Mountrail
|
Alger
|
SI/NC
|
Vachal 3-34 6H
|
|
|
31035
|
Whiting
|
Mountrail
|
Sanish
|
loc
|
Kaden TTT 11-25H
|
|
|
31036
|
Whiting
|
Mountrail
|
Sanish
|
loc
|
Westin TTT 11-25H
|
|
|
31037
|
Statoil
|
Mountrail
|
Alger
|
SI/NC
|
Vachal 3-34 8TFH
|
|
|
31038
|
Statoil
|
Mountrail
|
Alger
|
SI/NC
|
Vachal 3-34 7H
|
|
|
31039
|
Statoil
|
Mountrail
|
Alger
|
SI/NC
|
Vachal 3-34 XW
|
|
|
31040
|
Thunderbird Resources
|
McKenzie
|
Ranch Creek
|
conf
|
Watson B N34-11-4H
|
|
|
31041
|
Thunderbird Resources
|
McKenzie
|
Ranch Creek
|
conf
|
Watson B N34-11-3H
|
|
|
31042
|
Thunderbird Resources
|
McKenzie
|
Ranch Creek
|
conf
|
Watson B N34-11-2H
|
|
|
31043
|
EOG
|
Mountrail
|
Parshall
|
SI/NC
|
Austin 92-1807H
|
|
|
31044
|
XTO
|
McKenzie
|
Grinnell
|
conf
|
Homer Federal 14X-32F2
|
|
|
31045
|
XTO
|
McKenzie
|
Grinnell
|
conf
|
Homer Federal 14X-32F
|
|
|
31046
|
XTO
|
McKenzie
|
Grinnell
|
conf
|
Home Federal 14X-32B
|
|
|
31047
|
OXY USA
|
Dunn
|
Manning
|
loc
|
State Dvorak A 8-16-21H-1542-96
|
|
|
31048
|
OXY USA
|
Dunn
|
Manning
|
loc
|
State Dvorak A 9-16-21H-142-96L
|
|
|
31049
|
Whiting
|
McKenzie
|
Pembroke
|
SI/NC
|
Smokeky 2-16-21-15H3
|
|
|
31050
|
Whiting
|
McKenzie
|
Pembroke
|
SI/NC
|
Smokey 2-16-21-16HA
|
|
|
31051
|
Whiting
|
McKenzie
|
Pembroke
|
SI/NC
|
Smokey 2-16-21-16H3
|
|
|
31052
|
Whiting
|
McKenzie
|
Pembroke
|
SI/NC
|
Smokey 2-16-21-16H
|
|
|
31053
|
Oasis
|
McKenzie
|
Camp
|
conf
|
Andersmadson 5201 42-24 3B
|
|
|
31054
|
Oasis
|
McKenzie
|
Camp
|
conf
|
Andersmadson 5201 42-24 4T
|
|
|
31055
|
Oasis
|
McKenzie
|
Camp
|
conf
|
Andersmadson 5201 42-24 5B
|
|
|
31056
|
Oasis
|
McKenzie
|
Camp
|
conf
|
Andersmadson 5201 42-24 6T
|
|
|
31057
|
MRO
|
McKenzie
|
Antelope
|
conf
|
Charmaine USA 14-35TFH
|
|
|
31058
|
MRO
|
McKenzie
|
Antelope
|
conf
|
Clarks Creek USA 14-35H
|
|
|
31059
|
MRO
|
McKenzie
|
Antelope
|
conf
|
Ethel USA 14-35TFH-2B
|
|
|
31060
|
MRO
|
McKenzie
|
Antelope
|
conf
|
Heather USA 13-35TFH
|
|
|
31061
|
MRO
|
McKenzie
|
Antelope
|
conf
|
Juanita USA 13-35H
|
|
|
31062
|
Denbury
|
Bowman
|
Cedar Hills
|
170
|
CHSU ML41-02NH 05
|
Red River B, t7/15; cum 30K 12/15
|
|
31063
|
Whiting
|
McKenzie
|
Pembroke
|
SI/NC
|
Smokey 2-16-21-16HU3
|
|
|
31064
|
SM Energy
|
McKenzie
|
Poe
|
SI/NC
|
Rich 1X-16HA
|
|
|
31065
|
SM Energy
|
McKenzie
|
Poe
|
SI/NC
|
Steve 1-16H
|
|
|
31066
|
SM Energy
|
McKenzie
|
Poe
|
SI/NC
|
Rini 1X-16HB
|
|
|
31067
|
Whiting
|
Williams
|
Epping
|
loc
|
P Ellis 155-99-13-31-30-4H
|
|
|
31068
|
Whiting
|
Williams
|
Epping
|
loc
|
P Ellis 155-99-13-31-30-4H3
|
|
|
31069
|
Whiting
|
Williams
|
Stockyard Creek
|
loc
|
P Ellis 155-99-13-31-7-13H3
|
|
|
31070
|
Whiting
|
Williams
|
Stockyard Creek
|
loc
|
P Ellis 155-99-13-31-7-13H
|
|
|
31071
|
Enerplus
|
McKenzie
|
Eagle Nest
|
conf
|
Bait 149-95-36-25H
|
|
|
31072
|
Enerplus
|
McKenzie
|
Eagle Nest
|
conf
|
Tackle 149-95-36C-25H
|
|
|
31073
|
SM Energy
|
Divide
|
West Ambrose
|
SI/NC
|
Inez 1B-16HN
|
|
|
31074
|
SM Energy
|
Divide
|
West Ambrose
|
SI/NC
|
Loren 1B-16HS
|
|
|
31075
|
SM Energy
|
Divide
|
West Ambrose
|
SI/NC
|
Rolie 1-16HN
|
|
|
31076
|
HRC
|
Dunn
|
McGregory Buttes
|
prod
|
Fort Berthold 147-94-2B-11-6h
|
a big well
|
|
31077
|
HRC
|
Dunn
|
McGregory Buttes
|
prod
|
Fort Berthold 147-94-2B-11-7H
|
|
|
31078
|
HRC
|
Dunn
|
McGregory Buttes
|
lprod
|
Fort Berthold 147-94-2B-11-8H
|
a big well
|
|
31079
|
HRC
|
Dunn
|
McGregory Buttes
|
loc
|
Fort Berthold 147-94-2B-11-10H
|
|
|
31080
|
HRC
|
Dunn
|
McGregory Buttes
|
prod
|
Fort Berthold 147-94-2B-11-9H
|
a big well
|
|
31081
|
HRC
|
Dunn
|
McGregory Buttes
|
loc
|
Fort Berthold 148-94-35C-26-10H
|
|
|
31082
|
HRC
|
Dunn
|
McGregory Buttes
|
loc
|
Fort Berthold 148-94-35C-26-7H
|
|
|
31083
|
HRC
|
Dunn
|
McGregory Buttes
|
loc
|
Fort Berthold 148-94-35C-26-9H
|
|
|
31084
|
HRC
|
Dunn
|
McGregory Buttes
|
loc
|
Fort Berthold 148-94-35C-26-8H
|
|
|
31085
|
HRC
|
Dunn
|
McGregory Buttes
|
loc
|
Fort Berthold 148-94-35C-26-6H
|
|
|
31086
|
Whiting
|
Williams
|
Truax
|
prod
|
P Pankowski 153-98-4-6-7-13H
|
a huge well
|
|
31087
|
Whiting
|
Williams
|
Truax
|
prod
|
P Pankowski 153-98-4-6-7-13H3
|
a huge well
|
|
31088
|
Whiting
|
Williams
|
Truax
|
prod
|
P Pankowski 153-98-4-6-7-13HA
|
a huge well
|
|
31089
|
Whiting
|
Williams
|
Truax
|
prod
|
P Pankowski 153-98-4-6-7-14H3
|
a huge well
|
|
31090
|
BR
|
Dunn
|
Cabernet
|
conf
|
E. H. Stroh 4B MBH-ULW
|
|
|
31091
|
XTO
|
McKenzie
|
Siverston
|
conf
|
Nordeng 34X-23A
|
|
|
31092
|
XTO
|
McKenzie
|
Siverston
|
conf
|
Nordeng 34X-23AXB
|
|
|
31093
|
XTO
|
McKenzie
|
Siverston
|
conf
|
Nordeng 34X-23EXF
|
|
|
31094
|
XTO
|
McKenzie
|
Siverston
|
conf
|
Nordeng 34X-23B
|
|
|
31095
|
XTO
|
McKenzie
|
Siverston
|
conf
|
Nordeng 34X-23F
|
|
|
31096
|
Crescent Point
|
Divide
|
Colgan
|
conf
|
CPEC Elgaard 3-31-32-164N-100@
|
|
|
31097
|
Crescent Point
|
Divide
|
Colgan
|
conf
|
CPEC Elgaard 2-31-32-164N-100W
|
|
|
31098
|
Hess
|
Williams
|
Beaver Lodge
|
444
|
BL-Iverson C-155-96-1423H-2
|
t12/15; cum 12K 12/15;
|
|
31099
|
Hess
|
Williams
|
Beaver Lodge
|
886
|
BL-Iverson C-155-96-1423H-4
|
t11/15; cum 34K 12/15;
|
|
31100
|
Hess
|
Williams
|
Beaver Lodge
|
740
|
BL-Iverson C-LE-155-96-1423H-1
|
t11/15; cum 30K 12/15;
|
|
31101
|
Samson Resources
|
Divide
|
Ambrose
|
conf
|
Beetle 3130-7H
|
|
|
31102
|
Samson Resources
|
Divide
|
Ambrose
|
conf
|
Beetle 3130-5H
|
|
|
31103
|
Samson Resources
|
Divide
|
Ambrose
|
conf
|
Charger 0607-6h
|
|
|
31104
|
CLR
|
Dunn
|
Oakdale
|
A
|
Hawkinson 15-22H
|
no test date; s5/15; cum 7K 12/15;
|
|
31105
|
Whiting
|
McKenzie
|
Poe
|
PNC
|
Koala 44-5H
|
|
|
31106
|
Whiting
|
McKenzie
|
Poe
|
SI/NC
|
Koala 44-5-2H
|
|
Wednesday, February 3, 2016
Random Update Of First 100 Permits In 2Q15 -- North Dakota -- February 3, 2016
Number Of Active Business Registrations In North Dakota Leveling Off -- February 3, 2016
From The Dickinson Press:
The number of active business registrations in North Dakota climbed to nearly 117,000 last year and is up more than 35 percent since 2011, but filings have begun to level off with the economic slowdown driven by depressed oil and farm commodity prices, Secretary of State Al Jaeger said.
The slowdown and additional staff have helped the office catch up with processing, he said, after high demand for services in 2012 led to his controversial decision to shorten window hours by three hours, drawing criticism from Democrats during his 2014 re-election campaign.
Active business registrations soared from 85,911 at the end of June 2011 to 116,814 at the end of 2015. The registrations include corporations, limited liability companies (LLCs), partnerships, nonprofits, trade names, trademarks and cooperatives.
Monthly filings peaked at 1,851 in May 2012 as the oil boom was in full swing. But they’ve since leveled off, averaging 966 per month during the last three months of 2015 – the first quarter to average less than 1,000 filings per month since the second quarter of 2011.
He said he hopes he won’t lose any staff to budget cuts that are expected after the release of a new revenue forecast Monday.
Otherwise, he may have to "shorten window hours again." LOL.
I vaguely remember that story. I think it was three hours / week. Maybe it was per day. Regardless, I assume he knew what he was doing.
Random Update On Shale Gas In Europe -- February 3, 2016
Russia - Saudi Agreement? Not Gonna Happen -- Goldman Sachs
Story at Rigzone. Archived.
When I saw the headline over at Rigzone, I didn't know what to think. Here's the headline: ""Mainland Europe Shale Gas: What Now?"
The last I had heard was that with regard to shale gas in Europe, it was a bust, geologically and politically. And now with the world awash in natural gas, I thought, what fresh hell is this?
But one almost has to laugh. Here's the story:
The shale gas boom has proved to be a game changer for the United States economy, bringing about an era of cheap natural gas that has helped to make the country's industry more competitive. Some other countries around the world would like to follow suit, with perhaps Argentina having the best hope of replicating the success seen in North America thanks to its Vaca Muerta shale gas province.
Europe has also been seen as a future shale gas region in recent years, but a Wood Mackenzie survey of global shale gas drilling activity highlights only three European countries – Poland, Ukraine and the UK – as having any shale gas wells scheduled for 2016.
The key data points from the survey:
From Rigzone:
Miss Emily's Picture, John Conlee
Story at Rigzone. Archived.
*************************************
Shale Natural Gas In Europe -- Update
When I saw the headline over at Rigzone, I didn't know what to think. Here's the headline: ""Mainland Europe Shale Gas: What Now?"
The last I had heard was that with regard to shale gas in Europe, it was a bust, geologically and politically. And now with the world awash in natural gas, I thought, what fresh hell is this?
But one almost has to laugh. Here's the story:
The shale gas boom has proved to be a game changer for the United States economy, bringing about an era of cheap natural gas that has helped to make the country's industry more competitive. Some other countries around the world would like to follow suit, with perhaps Argentina having the best hope of replicating the success seen in North America thanks to its Vaca Muerta shale gas province.
Europe has also been seen as a future shale gas region in recent years, but a Wood Mackenzie survey of global shale gas drilling activity highlights only three European countries – Poland, Ukraine and the UK – as having any shale gas wells scheduled for 2016.
The key data points from the survey:
- the UK will lead the way; the country has "well-documented" support for the development of a shale gas industry and six wells are expected to be drilled in the UK in 2016
- mainland Europe looks bleak after several setbacks in 2015
- results in Poland were disappointing, and a widespread anti-fracking movement has also hindered shale gas development; last summer COP "gave up the ghost in Poland; CVX, XOM, Total, and MRO all withdrew during the previous three years
- in the Ukraine, Eni could drill its first shale well in the Lviv Basin, in the west Ukraine, depending on regulatory and security factors
- Denmark: disappointing
- Germany: disappointing; some legislative support but members of the coalition government could not agree on the details
******************************
Pakistan
From Rigzone:
Pakistan hopes to tap potential shale gas resources in the country and has alloted the exploration project to two oil and gas companies, a local media reported Tuesday.
"Oil and Gas Development Company Limited (OGDCL) and Pakistan Petroleum Company Limited (PPL) have been tasked to carry out a pilot project to explore shale gas deposits, estimated at more than 10,000 trillion cubic feet (Tcf)."
The Pakistani government is making efforts to explore for shale gas resources given a supply deficit of around 2 billion cubic feet per day (Bcf/d) gas in the South Asian country and rising energy needs, while domestic gas production stands at around 4.16 Bcf/d gas.Wow, I hate dealing with natural gas. I can't get my hands around "trillions" of anything. Here we go again, another mother lode of natural gas estimated at "10,000 trillion cubic feet." To put that in perspective, the Marcellus is huge. Huge. And it's estimated to have 480 trillion cubic feet, so 10,000 trillion cubic feet seems a bit noteworthy. From an earlier post:
Disclaimer: I often make simple arithmetic errors. Numbers rounded. Natural gas reserves according to BP/wiki, 2013 - 2014 (US estimate as of December 2013). Top five countries:
Now, let's go back and re-run the numbers that were posted earlier:
- Russia: 6,000 trillion cubic feet
- Iran: 1,000 trillion cubic feet
- Qatar: 900 trillion cubic feet
- Turkmenistan: 600 trillion cubic feet
- US: 350 trillion cubic feet
- #11: Australia: 152 trillion cubic feet (as of January, 2014). (See this post.)
- that recent huge Mediterranean natural gas find: 30 trillion cubic feet
- Barnett, revised USGS figures: 53 trillion cubic feet
- Utica, newly revised figures: 782 trillion cubic feet
- Marcellus, EIA revised estimates: 65 trillion cubic feet, "proved" reserves
- October 18, 2017: USGS survey -- 300 trillion cubic feet of natural gas, up from roughly 70 trillion cubic feet in its last survey in 2010.
So, Pakistan might have discovered natural gas reserves almost twice what Russia has? I'm not holding my breath.
- Bakken/Three Forks, USGS estimate: 7 trillion cubic feet
- Qatar: 800 trillion cubic feet, wiki, conversion
Labels:
Fracking_Europe,
NG,
NG_Country
Tuesday, February 2, 2016
Huge New Natural Gas Electric Plant Proposed For Chicago Area -- February 2, 2016
I'll let readers point out where I am wrong.
From Crain's Chicago Business:
NOAA data shows downward trend of extreme high temps since 1930s.
Of course, the warmists cannot handle this. Reminds me of the Romantic Period which followed the Industrial Revolution.
From Crain's Chicago Business:
Think of things Chicago has in abundance and cold weather, steakhouses and corrupt politicians might come to mind.
You might not add electricity to this list, but you ought to. With five mammoth nuclear stations and several coal-fired facilities furnishing more than enough juice to keep lights burning bright here, building a huge new plant might cause some head-scratching.
But a Maryland-based power generator plans to do just that. Competitive Power Ventures Holdings, based in the Washington, D.C., suburb of Silver Springs, says it's constructing an 1,100-megawatt plant fueled by natural gas in Grundy County, about 50 miles southwest of Chicago, near Exelon's existing Dresden nuclear plant.
That's an unusually large combined-cycle gas plant, generating enough to power 1.1 million homes—more than either of Dresden's two reactors. (Dresden as a whole can power 1.5 million homes.)My comments to the reader who sent me the link:
CPV unveiled the $1 billion-plus CPV Three Rivers Energy Center, as it's called, on January 28, 2016. The facility will be built and run strictly by union workers. The project is expected to create about 500 construction jobs and 25 full-time jobs once built.
As plants get bigger, economy of scale comes into play. Something doesn't make sense with this. The most I've seen a natural gas plan cost is about $850,000/MW.
Maybe readers can point out something I missed. I often make simple arithmetic errors. Perhaps I put the decimal point in the wrong place.This one is said to be $1 billion-plus for 1,100 MW.Even at $1 billion, that works out to over $900,000/MW -- my hunch is that cost overruns will easily put this into the $1 million / MW ballpark.
**************************
Apparently The Science Is Not Settled
NOAA data shows downward trend of extreme high temps since 1930s.
Of course, the warmists cannot handle this. Reminds me of the Romantic Period which followed the Industrial Revolution.
The Number Of Active Rigs In North Dakota Hits A New Post-Boom Low: 44 -- February 2, 2016
One (1) well comes off the confidential list Wednesday:
No new permits.
Slawson canceled five (5) permits, they were all Hunter permits in Mountrail County.
There was one permit renewal: a CPEUSC Fairholm permit in Divide County renewed by Crescent Point Energy.
Halcon added five (5) more wells to the "plugged or producing" list.
Our oldest granddaughter had an eventful weekend.
Friday evening she participated in a music ensemble competition. She played the bass flute in her ensemble. I think I may have talked about this before on the blog; can't remember. Regardless, yesterday, she came home with a first place ribbon: her ensemble took first place.
On Saturday, she was among 300 middle school students to participate in a math and science competition. Today, she came with a ribbon, having placed 10th among the 300. I assume the top nine were boys, and all with Indian (sub-continent India) or Asian background.
- 31091, SI/NC, XTO, Nordeng 34X-23A, Cabernet, no production data,
| 2/2/2016 | 02/02/2015 | 02/02/2014 | 02/02/2013 | 02/02/2012 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Active Rigs | 44 | 145 | 192 | 187 | 201 |
No new permits.
Slawson canceled five (5) permits, they were all Hunter permits in Mountrail County.
There was one permit renewal: a CPEUSC Fairholm permit in Divide County renewed by Crescent Point Energy.
Halcon added five (5) more wells to the "plugged or producing" list.
**************************
Note to the Granddaughters
Our oldest granddaughter had an eventful weekend.
Friday evening she participated in a music ensemble competition. She played the bass flute in her ensemble. I think I may have talked about this before on the blog; can't remember. Regardless, yesterday, she came home with a first place ribbon: her ensemble took first place.
On Saturday, she was among 300 middle school students to participate in a math and science competition. Today, she came with a ribbon, having placed 10th among the 300. I assume the top nine were boys, and all with Indian (sub-continent India) or Asian background.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)