Locator: 48488TECH.
Robotics, humanoid: link here.
Amazon, creepy but this is where we are already. Link here.
Locator: 48488TECH.
Robotics, humanoid: link here.
Amazon, creepy but this is where we are already. Link here.
Locator: 48489B.
US equity market: worst day for the NASDAQ this year?
******************************
Back to the Bakken
WTI: $65.90.
Active rigs: 30.
Five new permits, #41687 - #41691, inclusive:
Three permits renewed:
Locator: 48487APPLE.
X is down: has been up and down since 5:00 a.m. local time this
morning. Now fully down -- I am unable to access x. Let the conspiracy
theories begin. [Later: the "downdetector" gauge show the problem is
getting worse, not better.]
Apple: here's why Apple isunlikely to release an M4 Ultra chip for Macs. Link here.
The new Mac Studio is available with mismatched M4 Max and M3 Ultra chip options. Will there be an M4 Ultra chip in the future, though? It looks unlikely.
Here are three reasons why Apple might never release an M4 Ultra chip.
First, among Apple's line of Mac chips, the highest-end Ultra chips are effectively two Max chips fused together with a technology called UltraFusion. So, the M1 Ultra chip is two M1 Max chips combined, and the M2 Ultra chip is two M2 Max chips combined. However, Apple confirmed that the M4 Max chip lacks an UltraFusion connector, so that means Apple cannot simply release a doubled-up M4 Ultra chip this time around.
Second, Apple told several journalists and YouTubers that not every generation of Mac chips will have an "Ultra" chip. The timing of Apple revealing this information suggests that we might never get an M4 Ultra chip.
And third, from Mark Gurman, Bloomberg: Apple is reluctant to develop an M4 Ultra chip from scratch due to production challenges, costs, and the relatively small sales volume of its desktop computers, like the Mac Studio. So, that seems to rule out the only other way in which Apple could have released an M4 Ultra chip.
Wiki's transistor count has not been updated in quite some time despite huge "gains" by Apple. Most likely this is due to the fact that "transistor count" is fully out of date. Transistor count is simply one "spec" point. Think:
**********************************
Disclaimer
Brief
Reminder
Briefly:
Locator: 48486B.
X is down: has been up and down since 5:00 a.m. local time this morning. Now fully down -- I am unable to access x. Let the conspiracy theories begin. [Later: the "downdetector" gauge show the problem is getting worse, not better.]
Victor Davis Hanson: no one is ready for what comes next. Must-watch.
Victor Davis Hanson: Mexico, MeToo no more, the Left's meager pickin's. Must-watch.
GDPNow: latest estimate, 1Q25, -2.4%. Link here.
Recession: Trump refuses to r/o a recession under his watch. It takes awhile for these things to happen, and sometimes longer for them to correct. Thus, might the US be in a severe recession going into the mid-term elections?
Most important date for investors: May 31, 2026.
******************************
Back to the Bakken
WTI: $66.34.
New wells:
RBN Energy: tech giants increasingly turning to natural gas to power data centers.
******************************
Early Production Data
The wells:
| Pool | Date | Days | BBLS Oil | Runs | BBLS Water | MCF Prod | MCF Sold | Vent/Flare |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BAKKEN | 1-2025 | 31 | 23892 | 23947 | 34516 | 43079 | 42612 | 467 |
| BAKKEN | 12-2024 | 31 | 28196 | 28095 | 43030 | 44362 | 43793 | 569 |
| BAKKEN | 11-2024 | 22 | 20337 | 20356 | 31414 | 27210 | 26819 | 391 |
| BAKKEN | 10-2024 | 28 | 32229 | 32270 | 29364 | 73435 | 71829 | 1606 |
| BAKKEN | 9-2024 | 20 | 31227 | 31030 | 46688 | 61978 | 60778 | 1200 |
| Pool | Date | Days | BBLS Oil | Runs | BBLS Water | MCF Prod | MCF Sold | Vent/Flare |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BAKKEN | 1-2025 | 24 | 18848 | 19047 | 42327 | 18337 | 17348 | 902 |
| BAKKEN | 12-2024 | 31 | 37287 | 37231 | 78098 | 39791 | 27607 | 12015 |
| BAKKEN | 11-2024 | 30 | 30359 | 30397 | 79937 | 29203 | 22064 | 7003 |
| BAKKEN | 10-2024 | 28 | 30380 | 30312 | 81407 | 31845 | 8623 | 23048 |
| BAKKEN | 9-2024 | 20 | 21052 | 20757 | 74669 | 22499 | 0 | 22389 |
| BAKKEN | 8-2024 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| BAKKEN | 7-2024 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| BAKKEN | 6-2024 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Locator: 48485LDCS.
RBN Energy: tech giants increasingly turning to natural gas to power data centers.
The pace of announcements for planned data centers accelerated in 2024 and has continued to gather steam in 2025, with natural gas-fired power plants emerging as a frequent choice, along with nuclear power, to provide the around-the-clock electricity that large-scale data centers want and need. In today’s RBN blog, the first in a series, we’ll detail plans by several well-known energy firms to construct new gas-fired plants that would produce electricity specifically for data centers.
Let’s start with some data-center basics. As we discussed in Storm Front, a data center (see photo below) is the home for hundreds or even thousands of networked computers that process, store and share data. Data centers — many of them owned and operated by tech giants — are among the most energy-intensive building types, consuming up to 50 times the energy per square foot of a typical commercial office building, with electrical demand at larger facilities ranging from 100 megawatts (MW) to 2,000 MW. (For perspective, as we noted in Just Can’t Get Enough, a city the size of Lubbock, TX, — population 267,000 — only requires about 700 MW.) Demand for data centers has grown exponentially with the expansion of artificial intelligence (AI) tools like ChatGPT and Perplexity, which require far more computational power — and energy — than conventional Google searches.
The Interior of an Amazon Data Center. Source: Amazon
Why Natural Gas?
As we noted in Dive In, the main reason firms are considering natural gas to power their data centers is that it is a consistent source of round-the-clock power and can be deployed at scale, usually within a reasonable period of time. Recent headlines for power deals indicate that tech firms are willing to pay up for power — as long as it is reliable — so while gas generation is relatively cheap, that’s more of an added benefit rather than the key feature.
Importantly, gas-fired generation generally can be deployed relatively quickly, allowing for solutions that are quick and nimble. A case in point is a data center in Memphis, TN, where 14 mobile gas-fired generators were brought in to help power a 150-MW facility being developed by Elon Musk’s xAI. (We’ll discuss this development and mobile generators in more detail in Part 2.) In contrast, while the buzz around nuclear is surging due to its reliability and the fact that it doesn’t produce GHGs, it is more expensive to build and has higher hurdles to clear than gas, with years of permitting headaches and construction in the best of circumstances (see We’ll Be Together).