Saturday, July 28, 2018

Random Look At A CLR Hayes Well With Jump In Production In Crazy Man Creek -- July 28, 2018

No data at FracFocus suggesting this well has been re-fracked:
  • 20193, 574, CLR, Hayes 1-6H, Crazy Man Creek, t6/11; cum 334K 5/18;
Recent production profile:
PoolDateDaysBBLS OilRunsBBLS WaterMCF ProdMCF SoldVent/Flare
BAKKEN5-2018319173895911580907790770
BAKKEN4-2018301159411961146321252912179350
BAKKEN3-201829145251462418857140531395994
BAKKEN2-2018226228591410403769125285163
BAKKEN1-201831423744028269628906289
BAKKEN12-20173176757597151081116582410341
BAKKEN11-2017271159111281236151357986204959
BAKKEN10-20170000000
BAKKEN9-20170000000
BAKKEN8-20170000000
BAKKEN7-20170000000
BAKKEN6-20171565981761674570639
BAKKEN5-2017311556175111281693160093
BAKKEN4-20173016561686127018121710102

The graphic:


Random Look At Jump In Production (x2) For A CLR Stangeland Well In Crazy Man Creek; Heel-To-Toe; Toe-To-Heel -- July 28, 2018

This is the parent well, runs from the south to the north:
  • 20188, 519, CLR, Stangeland 1-18H, Crazy Man Creek, API - 33-105-02102, t12/11; cum 256K 5/18; FracFocus without evidence that it was re-fracked;
See full production profile at this post. Note the jumps in production that correlate with the timing of the fracks of the neighboring wells.

These are the daughter wells, all of them run north to south:
  • 29844, 1,789, CLR, Stangeland 4-7H1, Crazy Man Creek, t11/17; cum 138K 5/18;
  • 29845, 2,155, CLR, Stangeland 5-7H, Crazy Man Creek, t12/17; cum 182K 5/18;

  • 29035, 1,051, CLR, Stangeland 3-7H1, Crazy Man Creek, t3/15; cum 185K 5/18;
  • 29036, 1,246, CLR, Stangeland 2-7H, Crazy Man Creek, t3/15; cum 230K 5/18;
  • 31427, 1,251, CLR, Stangeland 8-7H, Crazy Man Creek, t2/18; cum 87K 5/18;
  • 31428, 633, CLR, Stangeland 9-7H1, Crazy Man Creek, t2/18; cum 67K 5/18;
The graphic:

Random Update Of MRO Well Production After Neighboring Well Fracked -- July 28, 2018

Updates

October 1, 2018: #16993 looks pretty good --
PoolDateDaysBBLS OilRunsBBLS WaterMCF ProdMCF SoldVent/Flare
BAKKEN8-20183156165674284035612840216
BAKKEN7-20183160285937362035982266798
BAKKEN6-201830578256524868442829101005
BAKKEN5-2018131971180933041513603674

 
Original Post
Wow, wow, wow --- earlier this note:
  • February 16, 2018: check on these two wells in about six months, #16993, #17797; a neighboring MRO well reported an IP of 6,204 on this date (#33535);
So, let's check on #16993 and #17797.

First,  #16993:
Monthly Production Data:
PoolDateDaysBBLS OilRunsBBLS WaterMCF ProdMCF SoldVent/Flare
BAKKEN5-2018131971180933041513603674
BAKKEN4-2018002220000
BAKKEN3-20180000000
BAKKEN2-20180000000
BAKKEN1-20180000000
BAKKEN12-20171520344037
BAKKEN11-2017144354865839627417
BAKKEN10-201731859909250120186861

It looks like we will have to come back to #16993 in a month or two. What about #17797.

Now, #17797, API - 33-025-00864; according to FracFocus, not re-fracked:
Monthly Production Data:
PoolDateDaysBBLS OilRunsBBLS WaterMCF ProdMCF SoldVent/Flare
BAKKEN5-201831117601191216586937754362995
BAKKEN4-201821857485642010865345924899
BAKKEN3-20180000000
BAKKEN2-20181001202
BAKKEN1-2018213101070108088
BAKKEN12-201711501314012
BAKKEN11-20171417301912755136601096
BAKKEN10-201731397939541529314202524

"Permania" Vs "Steady Eddy" -- July 28, 2018 -- Reason #3 Why I Love To Blog

This is pretty cool. Direct from the blog on several levels.

Some months ago, while tracking older Bakken wells, I started using the phrase, "steady Eddy." At the time I had never seen that phrase in all the articles -- and there must be a million articles by now -- I've read regarding the Bakken or the oil and natural gas sector. Here's a screen shot of my "16xxx" post:


I've also talked many times in the past year that it's my contention that short term, the Bakken is "a better bet" than the Permian. I've also singled out Oasis, "what don't you want?"

Now this article in The Williston Herald:
The romance with the Permian might not be over just yet, but many analysts are trying to show smitten investors that there's a steady Eddy they should perhaps pay more attention to.
That steady Eddy would be none other than the Bakken.
Among these is Pablo Prudencio, an upstream analyst for Woods MacKenzie in their Houston office. It is his job to help investors weigh the pros and cons of each play, and help them determine which play is the best bang for their buck. He spoke at the recent Bakken Conference and Expo on the topic.
Permania, he said, has been a very popular term to explain what’s been going on with the shale play, with its sky’s the limit entry prices.
“A lot of companies have paid a lot of money to get into the Permian,” he said. “The average Permian deal was $25,000 for every net acre.”
By contrast, the average in the Bakken is more like $2,500 per net acre.
There were even deals that were far more than $25,000 per acre, such as Oasis Petroleum’s purchase of acreage it described as “core of the core” in the Delaware portion of the Permian. That $946 million purchase averaged $46,600 per net acre.
Investors have paid these kinds of premiums for Permian positions because it offers 2,500 feet of stacked play. That’s like having several “Bakken-style” layers on top of each other, Prudencio explained. And because Permian wells so far seem to have break-evens that are less than the Bakken.
However, a deeper dive into the numbers shows a somewhat different picture, and “Permania” is subsiding as these issues become more clear.
Much, much more at the link.

More evidence? See this post on BHP.

**************************************
Notes to the Granddaughters

It was in the fall of 1989, I suppose, our last year in England, when I started reading out Twin Peaks in Newsweek magazine. I was not a bit disappointed when I saw the show. We were back in Germany when the Twin Peaks premiered, so I have no idea when I first saw the series. But I loved it then, and I still love it.


As I watched the video above, the first series I thought of, Netflix's House of Cards and Hitchcock, in general.

Top Ten "Oil Blogs" -- DrillingInfo -- July 28, 2018

From drillinginfo:
Top Bakken oil blogs:



Meanwhile, a google search of "oil blogs" results in 48,600,000 hits and the MDW blog is on the middle of page 5.  Many of the "hits" that rank higher are not even current any more including the much ballyhooed "oildrum" blog, a peak oil theory blog.

Top 60 oil blogs here. Scrolling through quickly I did not see any "Bakken-specific" blogs. What a shame.