- ConocoPhillips says it is in the process of selling its Kenai liquefied natural gas export terminal in Alaska, and will open a "data room" associated with the sale in January
- COP says its current focus is on North Slope operations; COP has a nearly $1B capital budget for Alaska in 2016, and has accepted delivery of two new drilling rigs this year
- COP says it has not exported any gas so far in 2016 because of market conditions, but the Kenai plant remains operational and ready to resume exports
Friday, November 18, 2016
ConocoPhillips (COP) Will Sell Its Kenai (Alaska) LNG Export Terminal -- November 18, 2016
From SeekingAlpha:
Labels:
Export_Energy_US,
LNG_Export,
LNG_Export_US
Note: this is not an investment site. Do not make any investment, financial, travel, relationship, or job decisions based on anything you read at this blog. If this is important to you, go to the source.
I'm actually ahead of the "game" this year. Often I wait until it's too late, but for whatever reason I cleaned up my equity portfolio before the end of the year, selling my losers (and some were significant) and using whatever cash I might have for new investments.
A reader asked me earlier this month on some of my thoughts on investing. I am the last person one would want to ask. No doubt I would have done much better over the years had I turned everything over to a professional financial advisor, but
Now that I am retired I don't have as much discretionary income as I had when I was part of the labor force. Most of my discretionary income available for investing comes from dividends that are not automatically reinvested from which they came.
It takes a few months for enough cash to accumulate to make purchases in new investments worthwhile.
So, that brought me back to the reader's question, about my thoughts on investments.
Reflecting on that, I asked myself, where did I do best over the years? What investments did the best? Anecdotally, it appears I did best when a company was spun off, or a company was bought, or a company was sold. And some of those "events" were incredibly significant. The problem: no one can predict those "events."
Two of the commonalities of those "events" were:
So, now with my cash today, where do I invest?
For awhile I was accumulating GE because I think it's a great company for someone with a 20-year horizon. But then when I saw the big computer chip companies buying smaller computer chip companies, I began to wonder whether accumulating XLNX might not be a better idea. In other words, invest in a great company with a "small market cap" in an enviable sector, thinking it might be taken over.
So, a challenge: should I change my investment strategy from accumulating a big-cap company like GE and investing in a blue-chip company that might be bought by another company? So, I'm struggling with that right now, but I think I've come to a solution.
I think I will stop here. The post is getting long. Maybe more later.
Oh, some thoughts with regard to the economy / political environment.
XLNX was recently in the news as a possible buyout candidate, but that "excitement" died when a chip company other than XLNX was bought by a larger chip company. I had invested in XLNX over the years and the question rose whether I should now sell it, that it was temporarily out of favor as a take-over candidate. Then Trump won the election, and XLNX suddenly looks incredibly better. I did not sell; I purchased more. I bought XLNX before the election (for the same reason) but with the election outcome, I feel even better.
The other day, I mentioned GEO. In the current political environment, it's interesting. Two problems: I don't see this as something I would accumulate over a 20-year horizon; and, it's in a sector I know little about. I haven't said I won't invest in GEO but it would go against two of my "rules" when investing.
*************************
A Note For The Granddaughters
I'm actually ahead of the "game" this year. Often I wait until it's too late, but for whatever reason I cleaned up my equity portfolio before the end of the year, selling my losers (and some were significant) and using whatever cash I might have for new investments.
A reader asked me earlier this month on some of my thoughts on investing. I am the last person one would want to ask. No doubt I would have done much better over the years had I turned everything over to a professional financial advisor, but
- I would not have had as much fun;
- I would not have learned as much; and,
- I would not have stayed involved in the US economy, which I really enjoy
Now that I am retired I don't have as much discretionary income as I had when I was part of the labor force. Most of my discretionary income available for investing comes from dividends that are not automatically reinvested from which they came.
It takes a few months for enough cash to accumulate to make purchases in new investments worthwhile.
So, that brought me back to the reader's question, about my thoughts on investments.
Reflecting on that, I asked myself, where did I do best over the years? What investments did the best? Anecdotally, it appears I did best when a company was spun off, or a company was bought, or a company was sold. And some of those "events" were incredibly significant. The problem: no one can predict those "events."
Two of the commonalities of those "events" were:
- the "events" all involved blue-chip stocks (small-cap, mid-cap, or big-cap)
- shares in all companies had originally been bought with a 20-year horizon
- BNSF/Berkshire
- BAX/Baxalter/Shire
- ATT breakup (years and years ago)
- HAL/BHI
- GE/BHI
So, now with my cash today, where do I invest?
For awhile I was accumulating GE because I think it's a great company for someone with a 20-year horizon. But then when I saw the big computer chip companies buying smaller computer chip companies, I began to wonder whether accumulating XLNX might not be a better idea. In other words, invest in a great company with a "small market cap" in an enviable sector, thinking it might be taken over.
So, a challenge: should I change my investment strategy from accumulating a big-cap company like GE and investing in a blue-chip company that might be bought by another company? So, I'm struggling with that right now, but I think I've come to a solution.
I think I will stop here. The post is getting long. Maybe more later.
Oh, some thoughts with regard to the economy / political environment.
XLNX was recently in the news as a possible buyout candidate, but that "excitement" died when a chip company other than XLNX was bought by a larger chip company. I had invested in XLNX over the years and the question rose whether I should now sell it, that it was temporarily out of favor as a take-over candidate. Then Trump won the election, and XLNX suddenly looks incredibly better. I did not sell; I purchased more. I bought XLNX before the election (for the same reason) but with the election outcome, I feel even better.
The other day, I mentioned GEO. In the current political environment, it's interesting. Two problems: I don't see this as something I would accumulate over a 20-year horizon; and, it's in a sector I know little about. I haven't said I won't invest in GEO but it would go against two of my "rules" when investing.
Another High-Proppant EOG Well In The Bakken -- November 18, 2016
Correction: originally I said this was a middle Bakken well; it's a Three Forks B1 well.
Track high-intensity wells here.
The average amount of proppant being used by other operators in the Bakken is somewhere between 4 million lbs and 8 million lbs. Anything over 10 million lbs gets my attention. Here's another EOG high-proppant well:
See first comment. The reader was impressed with the amount of natural gas produced (MCF) and was curious about the depths at which this well was drilling.
Many "boe conversion" sites on the net; this is one. Using that conversion table:
Stimulation was said to have occurred in the "Bakken" but the drilling report / geologic report said "Three Forks target zone." The application permit was for the "Three Forks B1" within 960-acre drilling unit.
From the drilling/geologic report:
Track high-intensity wells here.
The average amount of proppant being used by other operators in the Bakken is somewhere between 4 million lbs and 8 million lbs. Anything over 10 million lbs gets my attention. Here's another EOG high-proppant well:
- 31403, 1,447, EOG, West Clark 117-0136H, Clarks Creek, Three Forks first bench, 36 stages, 27.65 million lbs, t5/16; cum 132K 9/16;
| Pool | Date | Days | BBLS Oil | Runs | BBLS Water | MCF Prod | MCF Sold | Vent/Flare |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BAKKEN | 9-2016 | 28 | 26233 | 26679 | 37575 | 75879 | 71350 | 4134 |
| BAKKEN | 8-2016 | 21 | 21395 | 21243 | 29171 | 48541 | 40762 | 7450 |
| BAKKEN | 7-2016 | 31 | 33296 | 33386 | 48688 | 74521 | 65210 | 8811 |
| BAKKEN | 6-2016 | 30 | 32510 | 32269 | 58498 | 72921 | 70628 | 1809 |
| BAKKEN | 5-2016 | 14 | 18278 | 17857 | 39081 | 36703 | 33969 | 2528 |
See first comment. The reader was impressed with the amount of natural gas produced (MCF) and was curious about the depths at which this well was drilling.
Many "boe conversion" sites on the net; this is one. Using that conversion table:
- 75,000 mcf = 12,934 boe
- conversion factor appears to be ~ 5,800 at that conversion site
- in June, 2016, the BOE would be approximately: 32,510 + (72,921/5,800) = 32,510 + 12575 = 45,085 boe for the month of June, 2016
Stimulation was said to have occurred in the "Bakken" but the drilling report / geologic report said "Three Forks target zone." The application permit was for the "Three Forks B1" within 960-acre drilling unit.
From the drilling/geologic report:
- spud, December 21, 2015
- FTD, December 31, 2015
- TD: 18,217 feet
- total lateral: 7,269 feet; target total: 7,269 feet (in-zone, 100%)
- KOP: 10,291
- Three Forks entered at 10,774 feet; curve TD was reached at 10,948 feet, below the Samson E1 marker.
- "A total of 7,269' of lateral was drilled, of which 7,269' occurred in the Three Forks Target, in-zone calculation is 100%.
It's Already Happening: The Wall -- November 18, 2016
From my long post yesterday:
As you start to think about "the wall," remember that joke about two walkers approaching the woods, with one of the two walkers stopping to put on tennis shoes; when asked why, because he certainly can't outrun a bear, he said, "I don't have to outrun the bear; I only have to outrun you."
That holds true for "the wall." Texas will take the lead, partly because the "real' problem is in Texas. Once the word gets out that Texas is taking the lead on border security, the problem will move west to New Mexico, Arizona, and California. That will be fun to watch. [Update, one day later, November 18, 2016: it is now being reported that Central American immigrants are now pouring through Yuma, New Mexico.]
Labels:
Wall_Political
RINS And Refining -- November 18, 2016
Futures: Dow 30 green again. Oil up slightly.
Trump's threat to place a 35% tariff on cars manufactured in Mexico: Trump tweeted late last night to say that the Chairman of Ford called him personally to say that Ford has decided to keep Lincoln production in Kentucky. Trump reminded folks that he owed this to Kentucky for the state's confidence in Trump as president. There remains a bit of "confusion" exactly what's moving, who said what when, but the headline is what it is. A reader sent me the Bloomberg link.
New CIA director: member of the Republican Party's Tea Party; graduated first in his class from West Point; close confidant of Mike Flynn's -- see below. (Look at the age of the new CIA director and then see comments on age below.)
Active rigs:
RBN Energy: RIN costs and their widely varying impact on refiners and refining.
OPEC meeting: Saudi's oil minister urges OPEC to cut oil output to low end of target. The ceiling: 32.5 million bopd. In the September, 2016, meeting OPEC agreed to limit between 32.5 million and 33 million bopd.
Michigan seeks stay of order to deliver bottled water to Flint, MI:
Newest presidential appointments:
Bloomberg to end its daily politics show. The hosts are Mark Halperin and John Heilemann. The daily program will be off the air as of December 2, 2016, but will air four hour-long specials before finally coming to a close on January 20, 2016. The program first aired in October, 2014.
Conflict of interest? All that talk about a "blind Trump trust" is just that, "media talk." Won't happen; not required.
Trump's threat to place a 35% tariff on cars manufactured in Mexico: Trump tweeted late last night to say that the Chairman of Ford called him personally to say that Ford has decided to keep Lincoln production in Kentucky. Trump reminded folks that he owed this to Kentucky for the state's confidence in Trump as president. There remains a bit of "confusion" exactly what's moving, who said what when, but the headline is what it is. A reader sent me the Bloomberg link.
New CIA director: member of the Republican Party's Tea Party; graduated first in his class from West Point; close confidant of Mike Flynn's -- see below. (Look at the age of the new CIA director and then see comments on age below.)
***************************
Back to the Bakken
Active rigs:
| 11/18/2016 | 11/18/2015 | 11/18/2014 | 11/18/2013 | 11/18/2012 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Active Rigs | 38 | 65 | 184 | 183 | 187 |
RBN Energy: RIN costs and their widely varying impact on refiners and refining.
Over the past few weeks, publicly traded independent refining companies reported their latest quarterly results, and nearly all lamented on a common theme: the cost of Renewable Identification Numbers (RINs) is out of control. However, the financial burden is not felt equally across the industry, as companies with integrated marketing operations (refining, blending and retailing) don’t face the same RINs-cost albatross as merchant refiners who don’t have retail operations. Today we review the escalating RIN costs that obligated parties have endured this year and explain how the degree of financial pain depends on the level of refiners’ downstream integration.
RINs have become a leading topic of conversation—and angst—in the refinery sector, and we’ve been exploring the matter in the RBN blogosphere. In our initial bl
og a few years ago, we described the evolution of ethanol mandates and the limits on how much ethanol can be blended into gasoline without affecting engine performance.OPEC meeting: cut of at least 700,000 bopd needed to bring market balance -- Rigzone.
OPEC meeting: Saudi's oil minister urges OPEC to cut oil output to low end of target. The ceiling: 32.5 million bopd. In the September, 2016, meeting OPEC agreed to limit between 32.5 million and 33 million bopd.
****************************
WSJ Headlines That Caught My Eye
Michigan seeks stay of order to deliver bottled water to Flint, MI:
- delivering almost 400,000 cases/week is "unnecessary and likely unable to carry out";
- four cases of water per resident each week to roughly 30,000 homes;
- door-to-door delivery would cost about $10.5 million a month;
- currently 78,000/week being delivered through distribution centers around the city
- industry says rule incompatible with EU rule
- Scotland's highest court: ruled that a floor on per-unit alcohol prices is legal
- law passed by Scotland's parliament in 2012 to combat alcohol abuse
- the law established a 50-pence floor on per-unit alcohol prices
- not yet enacted due to law being tied up in court since 2012
*******************************
The Political Page
Newest presidential appointments:
- CIA Director: Mike Pompeo, US Representative, Kansas; West Point, Harvard Law School, member of the Tea Party Movement
- Attorney General: Jim Sessions, US Senator, Alabama
- US Representative Martha Roby (she and Terri Sewell were the first women elected to Congress from Alabama in regular elections)
- Attorney General Luther Strange
- state senator Trip Pittman
- state senator Cam Ward
- Democratic congressmen: 68 years old
- Republican congressmen: 48 years old
- the Democrats have lost 68 US House positions during the Obama administration (8 years)
Bloomberg to end its daily politics show. The hosts are Mark Halperin and John Heilemann. The daily program will be off the air as of December 2, 2016, but will air four hour-long specials before finally coming to a close on January 20, 2016. The program first aired in October, 2014.
Conflict of interest? All that talk about a "blind Trump trust" is just that, "media talk." Won't happen; not required.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
