Locator: 48064ARCHIVES.
Tesla deliveries: to be reported the second day of the next quarter? Next Tuesday, July 2, 2024?
*****************************
The Fed
The Fed, the "rate," the market, the talk: after lots and lots of discussion about the Fed and when will the Fed cut rates, and then today's numbers (the PCE) and then comments from various Fed committee members. the fog is starting to clear:
- "they" may be talking about 2% inflation, but no one has really defined what components / what metric the Fed is really, really following (they have a "preferred" metric but that's just one of many); and,
- no one has really, really defined how long the metric must remain at 2% for the Fed to cut.
If one has not yet noticed, the Fed's promise to cut the "Fed rate" is like watching Lucy holding the football for Charlie Brown to kick, and furthering the analogy, if Lucy ever lets Charlie Brown kick the ball, he will find Lucy has moved the goal posts.
This is what's going on and how things will play out:
- the Fed is not shooting for 2%; they're shooting for 1.5% inflation rate for several months and for indications that inflation has truly been tamed before they will make meaningful cuts;
- to get to 1.5% inflation, we will have to see significant deflation (or is it called disinflation now?);
- bottom line: the Fed is now targeting 1.5% not 2%;
- the only way to get to 1.5% is to get through 2% and to see lots of pain;
- the Fed hawks will want to see headlines of "pain" on the business pages of general interest magazines and other media outlets, not simply in the headlines of business magazines and other business media outlets.
- the only "thing" now holding back that 2% target is rent, and maybe house prices, but in the big scheme of things, the only "thing" between now and 2% inflation is rent;
- and the housing situation is so tight in the US, there is no chance landlords are going to lower rents, which is required if we're going to get to 2%.
So, again:
- the Fed is targeting 1.5% inflation using undefined metrics and undefined time periods;
- to get to 1.5%, lots of pain will need to be endured by the broad "middle class" -- however one wants to define that demographic
- the lower class is relatively unaffected by inflation (and if they are, no one is listening to them anyway); and the wealthy are doing, doing very, very well with 5% in money market funds to hedge against their investments in Nvidia.
And, oh by the way, while contemplating the above, no one has ever explained to me why the Fed targets a 2% inflation rate, and not 1% or 1.5% or 3% or 3.5%. So, even targeting 1.5% is incorrect. In fact, the Fed is looking for something else, but the press and Steve Liesman need a number, and 2% is the Fed's number, though in fact, it should be clear by now, it's really 1.5% if one needs a number.
In fact, the Fed is looking for something else.
The Fed is looking for this: an undefined (for lack of a better word) "pain index."
The Fed's “pain index":
- increasing unemployment rate, greater than 5% in U-3 unemployed;
- the lack of "we are hiring signs" in the store windows on Main Street;
- headlines in USA Today screaming the US economy is deteriorating;
- a falling GDP but without going negative.
The Fed will get no credit if it lowers rates in a Goldilocks environment, but if the economy starts to deteriorate and the pain index is obvious to all, then JPow can swoop in, cut rates, and look like the hero. And if timing works out, the Fed’s dithering could prove to be incredibly fortuitous for the next president, whomever (whoever?) that might be.
*****************************
The Market Today
The market was doing great the first half of the day, rising to new all-time highs in the S&P 500 and the NASDAQ but then by the end of the day everything deteriorated. What happened.
This is so obvious.
Last day of the month; last day of the quarter; last day of the first half -- after an incredible one month, one quarter, one half -- the money managers sold, locked in their profits, will take next week off, and then get back in the market in late July before the summer doldrums really set in.
By the way, how bad was it?
Before the 10 - 1 split, NVDA was trading for $1,000 / share, or split-adjusted, $100 / share.
Now it's in the $125 range. Today. NVDA lost ... drum roll .... off 30 cents or thereabouts, and then NVDA rose after hours.
Although AAPL pulled back significantly today, AAPL was still up 1.42% for the week, and , like NVDA, rose after hours.
****************
Disclaimer Briefly Reminder
- I am inappropriately exuberant about the US economy and the US market,
- I am also inappropriately exuberant about all things Apple.
- See disclaimer. This is not an investment site.
- Disclaimer:
this is not an investment site. Do not make any investment, financial,
job, career, travel, or relationship decisions based on what you read
here or think you may have read here. All my posts are done quickly:
there will be content and typographical errors. If anything on any of my
posts is important to you, go to the source. If/when I find
typographical / content errors, I will correct them.
- Reminder: I am inappropriately exuberant about the US economy and the US market,
- I am also inappropriately exuberant about all things Apple.
