Friday, August 30, 2019

Case Study: The Hess EN-Davenport Wells -- August 30, 2019

Background and purpose of posting: the "original" EN-Davenport well in this area (see graphics below) was drilled in 2008, the early days of the Bakken. After almost eleven years of production this well has produced only 81,000 bbls of oil. Based on notes from readers over the past twelve years of blogging, most readers would suggest that this well is "uneconomic." And yet, Hess did not abandon it. Why? Answer: the company held the lease by production. And, oh, by the way, this is going to be a great well at some point.

Point #2: let's talk. Can we be frank? The original Davenport well is lousy. But there they go again. Hess has permits for a 7-well pad less than 2,000 feet away and the nearest "new" horizontal will be about a thousand feet from the original well. Now either Hess considers the original Davenport well worthy of being replicated, or much more likely, the combination of experience, lessons learned, new completion strategies, etc., --- and most importantly -- what they've learned about the geology -- suggests to Hess they can get some pretty good wells in this area. Remember, Bakken operators now suggest they won't drill a well with a(n) EUR of less than a million bbls of crude oil. And each well "stands alone."

Point #3: ever since the Bakken boom began, there was a lot of talk about "sweet spots," and I bought into that argument. Many years ago, but I never posted my thoughts at the time, I started to think that "sweet spots" in the Bakken were being over-emphasized. Just as I argue that "rigs don't matter" in shale plays, I'm now ready to go out on this limb: "sweet spots" don't matter. I wish I had a date-time stamp for when I first thought that; it probably would have been in 2014 or thereabouts, after seven years of blogging. I'll discuss sweet spots in a later blog in greater depth.

By the way, for newbies, I am the only one who argues that "rigs don't matter"; no one agrees with me based on feedback from readers.

The graphics:




The wells:

  • 16928, 82 (no typo), Hess, EN-Davenport-156-94-1003H-1, Big Butte, t11/08; cum 81K 6/19;

  • 35522, conf, Hess, EN-Davenport ...
  • 35521, conf, Hess, EN-Davenport ...
  • 35520, conf, Hess, EN-Davenport ... unit line well;
  • 35519, conf, Hess, EN-Davenport ... unit line well;
  • 35518, conf, Hess, EN-Person ...
  • 35517, conf, Hess, EN-Person ...
Note: it is possible that one or more of these permits will be canceled before it's all over. 

I May Take The Day Off -- Good Luck To All -- August 30, 2019

This has to reassure investors.


Apparently, the IPO will list only on the Saudi exchange initially; Japan, possibly the second exchange. Will "shun" New York, Hong Kong markets.

Bakken Is Expanding -- Tier 2 Becoming Tier 1 -- August 30, 2019

We started talking about this several weeks (months?) ago.

First, a screenshot from The Williston Herald, August 29, 2019:


Then, this from Hart Energy:
The performance of a trio of step-out wells drilled by Continental Resources Inc., one of the biggest oil producers in the U.S., has again proven that optimized completion designs are working in the Bakken.

“As expected these three wells are outperforming nearby legacy wells by 80% to 110% during the first 60 days and preliminary estimates show these wells are delivering up to 100% rates of return,” Jack Stark, the company’s president, said on an earnings call April 30. “This is great news for our shareholders as we can confidently say that the value and performance of our inventory of approximately 4,000 Bakken wells continues to grow. We can also say that the core of the Bakken … just got bigger.”

Two of the wells, both in North Dakota, recorded 24-hour IPs of at least 2,400 barrels of oil equivalent per day (boe/d), while a third—in Montana—flowed 1,680 boe/d.The wells were drilled in the far western and southern parts of the company’s legacy Bakken acreage. So “we feel good that the areas in between are going to respond,” Stark said, noting Continental is also pushing farther north.

This comes as the company moves deeper into multizone unit development across its vast oil-rich Bakken acreage, having already completed nearly 200 optimized developed wells since early 2017.

Completion designs for the three step-outs varied based on the area, but the company said it essentially used closer perf cluster spacing and more stages and proppant than it has used historically in the areas.
August 5, 2019, presentation: on the fringes of the Bakken --
  • far, far west: Montana's Baird Federal 2-34H, 1,680 boepd 24-hour IP; outperforming legacy well by 100% at 120 days
  • far, far southwest: North Dakota's Burian 4-27H1, 2,400 boepd 24-hour IP; outperforming legacy well by 75% at 120 days
  • clearly outside tier 1 core: North Dakota's McClintock 8-1H1 2,440 boepd 24-hour IP; outperforming legacy well by 145% at 120 days
By the way, something else to note:
  • years ago, Lynn Helms suggested a Three Forks well next to a middle Bakken well is likely to be better than the middle Bakken well; note that both of the North Dakota wells were first bench Three Forks wells
  • also note: the third well noted: it's production is outperforming the legacy well by 145% at 120 days
    • Bakken was selling in the 20's during the Saudi Surge just a few years ago
    • Bakken: now selling in the 40s; much better takeaway capacity, cuts transportation costs
Disclaimer: this is not an investment site. Do not make any investment, financial, job, travel, career, or relationship decisions based on what you read here or think you may have read here.

*************************************
The CLR McClintock Wells

The graphics:



The wells:
  • 22031, 819, CLR, McClintock 1-1H, Pleasant Valley, t6/12; cum 221K 6/19;
  • 35538, 1,833, CLR, McClintock 8-1H1, Pleasant Valley, t2/19; cum 117K 6/19;
This well really does open up another great area.
Note:
  • "chronologic" number for #35538: #8
  • in less than four months, the newer well has produced 50% of what the older well has produced in seven years
  • well costs have come down significantly over the last seven years -- seven years -- yup, it's been that long between these two wells
  • First six months for the older well #22031, middle Bakken:
BAKKEN10-20123083008755548520171201710
BAKKEN9-2012301095110721532811559011559
BAKKEN8-2012311159511914503813284013284
BAKKEN7-2012311375513321682515662015662
BAKKEN6-2012221227112087945713830013830
BAKKEN5-20120000000
  • First five months for the newer well, #35538, Three Forks, 1st bench:
PoolDateDaysBBLS OilRunsBBLS WaterMCF ProdMCF SoldVent/Flare
BAKKEN6-2019302224522340230084192241228290
BAKKEN5-20193127757273722960742155398651874
BAKKEN4-201930376743773940642552702521329669
BAKKEN3-201919188691882725922268581000716610
BAKKEN2-2019910618102461564714223408910134

No Wells Coming Off Confidential List Today -- August 30, 2019

WTI is back! Link here. 
Crude in New York clung to gains as investors focused on depleting oil stockpile levels at Cushing, Oklahoma, the largest commercial oil depot in the U.S. 
Futures in New York climbed as much as 1.6% on Thursday, while Brent’s gain remained limited. Data from the Energy Information Administration on Wednesday showed stockpiles at the Cushing storage hub at the lowest level since December 2018 as the startup of new pipelines from the Permian help to relieve inventory pressure. 
These Permian conduits enable oil supplies to bypass Cushing and head straight for markets overseas, which is allowing WTI to rally and is holding back Brent. 
Crude futures in New York are poised for the biggest weekly gain since mid-July as U.S. government data this week showed declines in crude and fuel stockpiles. Investor sentiment has also improved as statements from China’s Commerce Ministry signaled the country wouldn’t immediately retaliate against the latest U.S. tariff increase. President Donald Trump said Thursday that the U.S. and China are scheduled to have a conversation about trade today.
No wells coming off the confidential list today: reason explained yesterday.

Active rigs:

$55.978/30/201908/30/201808/30/201708/30/201608/30/2015
Active Rigs6362543376

RBN Energy: Alliance Pipeline's role in moving natural gas from western Canada, part 5.
Canadian natural gas production — over 95% of which originates in Alberta and British Columbia — has averaged about 16 Bcf/d in 2018 and 2019 year-to-date, and this past January, it topped 16.7 Bcf/d, just shy of the peaks last seen in the mid-2000s. Production has stayed strong even as prices at AECO, the gas benchmark hub, have plummeted to historical lows in the face of relentless competition from U.S. gas supplies, slower demand growth locally, and pipeline takeaway constraints. Under these conditions, producers’ future growth prospects will come down to access to local and export demand, and that means there needs to be adequate pipeline capacity to reach those destination markets. Today, we continue our analysis of existing and potential pipeline takeaway capacity and utilization out of the region, this time with a focus on the Alliance Pipeline system.

Anyone Not Paying Attention Is Missing An Opportunity Of A Lifetime -- August 30, 2019

Updates

September 5, 2019: August jobs increase significantly -- huge story -- will get little media play --
  • making America great -- private payrolls grew by 195,000
    • forecast: 140,000 
    • 100,000 of those new jobs came in education and health services
    • the jump comes amid heightened fears that the US could slip into recession in next 12 months -- CNBC

September 2, 2019: JP Morgan says it's finally time to buy stocks despite trade woes. Link here at Bloomberg. It's hard for me to believe that JPM would say it's finally time to buy stocks if their analysts felt that there was a "recession right around the corner."


September 2, 2019: Link here.  My graph-filled post below -- the original post -- was posted three days ago, August 30, 2019. Today, published "two hours ago," CNBC has posted an almost exact copy of my post, LOL, even including the rarely seen Cass Freight Index. LOL. They posted a few graphs that I did not post: the ones that supported their case, of course, for "a recession right around the corner." 

September 1, 2019: Link here.
U.S. households ramped up their spending in July, providing reassurance that the economy’s decade-long expansion continued to roll despite slowing factory activity and global growth.
Personal-consumption expenditures, a measure of household spending, increased a seasonally adjusted 0.6% in July from June, a pickup from the previous two months, the Commerce Department said Friday, continuing a solid performance by the economy’s main driving force.
“The consumer is still very sturdy and providing fundamental strength to the overall economy,” said Jack Kleinhenz, chief economist at the National Retail Federation. “As long as we see a strong job market...the direction of the economy continues to be on track: positive but slowing.”  
Tell me again how tariffs are hurting / scaring the American consumer.

Link here. And you know, the up-surge in consumer spending is even bigger than I expected based on the lukewarm report.




Original Post

Disclaimer: this is not an investment site. Do not make any investment, financial, job, travel, career, or relationship decisions based on what you read here or what you think you may have read here.

Any investor not paying attention is missing an opportunity of a lifetime. Such opportunities don't come around often.

"Recession is right around the corner." How long have "we" been talking about the next recession? This is from Kiplinger, January 25, 2019 -- almost a year ago -- "states most unprepared for the next recession." It gets tedious.

Tariff war: peaked in 2Q19; is now winding down 

"Fed": will continue to cut rates; already at historic lows

2020 president campaign: officially underway; unlikely a sitting president would let an economy go sour during a re-election campaign

G-7:
  • mainstream media unable to come up with consistent anti-Trump story
  • Trump skating to wear the puck will be
    • Trump - Boris: post-Brexit plans; huge trade deal
    • Trump - Abe: huge agriculture initiatives
  • Trump: remained laser-focused on US economy
    • ignored Iranian party-crasher
    • ignored France who invited the party-crasher
    • met with those who could add most to US economy: UK, Japan
China: yuan on course for worst month since 1994; economy "deepens" in August;


US-Mexico: pipeline meddling resolved in US favor

Afghanistan: troop drawdown


WSJ, US 2Q19 growth slowed, corporate profits rose, link here:
  • GDP growth, a "solid pace" at 2.0%, down from first reading of 2.1%
  • US corporate profits rebounded (remember: tariff war at its worse during this period, 2Q19)
    • corporate earnings surged almost 5% from the prior quarter
    • compare with 1Q19: corporate profits declined 1.5%
    • compare with 4Q18: corporate profits declined 1.5%
    • most recent quarter: corporate profits increased 4.8%
    • corporate profits up almost 2% year-over-year
  • consumer spending (remember: tariff war at its worse during this period): up almost 5% (annual rate in 2Q19
    • consumer spending 2Q19: the strongest pace since late 2014
    • consumer spending: stronger than the previously estimated 4.3% 
    • consumer spending accounts for 2/3rds of GDP
    • US shoppers splurge in face of global headwinds; remember, this was at height of tariff war
  • 3Q19 GDP: on pace for a 2.2% growth rate 
US consumer sentiment: 19-year high.

US GDP, link here:





Cass Freight Index, link here:


US productivity, link here; and, here:


US labor costs, dropped significantly in 2Q19:


US employment, link here:


US employment, link here:


US unemployment:


Gasoline demand, link here:


US manufacturing: will move back from China to US; will move from Mexico to US.

US energy: speaks for itself.

US equity / US Treasuries yield: this is the real story when looking at "inversions." Bonds, under 2%; equity, approaching 4%.

Anyone complaining about the US economy is one French Fry short of a Happy Meal.