Random Update On Scanlan And Pankowski -- November 26, 2014

The graphics:

 The wells:

• 33404, 2,053, Whiting, Thomas 43-4H, Truax, t1/18; cum 203K 7/19; cum 257K 11/22;
  
• 33405, 1,229, Whiting, Thomas 43-4TFH, Truax, t1/18; cum 171K 7/19; cum 2239K 11/22;
  
• 33406, 2,502, Whiting, Thomas 43-2H, Truax, t1/18; cum 162K 7/19; cum 319K 11/22;
  
• 33407, 1,633, Whiting, Thomas 43-2TFH, Truax, t1/18; cum 199K 7/19; cum 267K 11/22;
  

• 33409, 1,102, Whiting, Scanlan 42-9TFH, Truax, t12/17; cum 176K 7/19; cum 240K 11/11;
  
• 33410, 1,947, Whiting, Scanlan 42-9-2TFH, Truax, t12/17; cum 176K 7/19; cum 185K 11/22;
  
• 33411, 1,980, Whiting, Scanlan 42-9-3TFH, Truax, t12/17; cum 139K 7/19; cum 194K 11/22;
  

• 25602, 2,631, Whiting, P Scanlan 153-98-16-9-5-5H, Truax, t3/14; cum 323K 7/19; cum 338K 11/22;
  
• 25601, 1,461, Whiting, P Scanlan 153-98-16-9-11-16H3, Truax, t4/14; cum 97K 7/19; cum 140K 11/22;
  
• 25600, 2,665, Whiting, P Scanlan 153-98-16-9-5-12H, Truax, t3/14; cum 308K 7/19; cum 353K 11/22;
  
• 27122, 2,372, Whiting, P Scanlan 153-98-16-9-11-16H, Truax, t4/14; cum 242K 7/19; cum 365K 11/22;
  

• 18770, 819, Whiting, Scanlan 3-5H, Truax, t9/10; cum 367K 7/19; cum 397K 11/22;
  

• 33294, 1,600, Whiting, Scanlan 11-5-2TFH, Truax, t1/18; cum 165K 7/19; cum 256K 11/22;
  
• 33295, 1,595, Whiting, Scanlan 11-5TFH, Truax, t1/18; cum 229K 7/19; cum 25K 11/22;
  
• 33296, 2.095, Whiting, Scanlan 11-5-2H, Truax, t12/17; cum 194K 7/19; cum 253K 11/22;
  
• 33297, 1,591, Whiting, Scanlan 11-5H, Truax, t12/17; cum 243K 7/19; cum 325K 11/22;
  

• 20856, 1,349, Whiting, King 3-8H, Truax, t1/12; cum 354K 7/19; see full production data here; cum 407K 11/22;
  
• 33455, 2,454, Whiting, King 11-8H, Truax, t12/17; cum 207K 7/19; cum 274K 11/22;
  
• 33456, 1,252, Whiting, King 11-8-2H, Truax, t12/17; cum 195K 7/19; cum 248K 11/22;
  
• 33457, 1,525, Whiting, King 11-8TFHU, Truax, t12/17; cum 190K 7/19; cum 269K 11/22;
  

• 28717, 3,638, Whiting, P Johnson153-98-1-6-7-16HA, Truax, t8/15; cum 465K 7/19; cum 557K 211/22;
  
• 28715, 3,899, Whiting, P Johnson153-98-1-6-7-16H, Truax, t9/15; cum 428K 7/19; cum 511K 11/22;
  

• 31086, 2,249, Whiting, P Pankowski 153-98-4-6-7-13H, Truax, t9/15; cum 369K 7/19; cum 425K 11/22;
  
• 31087, 2,399, Whiting, P Pankowski 153-98-4-6-7-13H3, Truax, t9/15; cum 205K 7/19; cum 240K 11/22;
  
• 31088, 2,248, Whiting, P Pankowski 153-98-4-6-7-13HA, Truax, t9/15; cum 3145K 7/19; cum 366K 11/22;
  
• 31089, 2,374, Whiting, P Pankowski 153-98-4-6-7-14H3, Truax, t10/15; cum 244K 7/19; cum 291K 11/22;
  

• 20857, 358, Whiting, Pankowski 4-6H, t2/12; cum 259K 7/19; with periodic small jumps in production, month-over-month; cum 273K 11/22;
  

***************************************

Original Post

NOTE: starting with cumulative totals in October, 2014, an asterisk should be placed, stating that producers could be choking back production starting in October, 2014, in the Bakken for any number of reasons:

• backlog in rail (BNSF said they were going to cut back on takeaway to make room for grain)
• global slump in oil prices
• tsunami of oil arriving at destinations
• North Dakota flaring rules go into effect 

18770, 819, Whiting/KOG, Scanlan 3-5H, Truax, t9/10; cum 285K 12/17; updated here;

20857, 358, Whiting/KOG, Pankowsi 4-6H, Truax, t2/12; cum 240K 112/17;

25599, dry, Whiting/KOG, P Scanlan 153-98-16-9-11-16H, c11/13; cement casing failure on surface spud;
25600, 2,665, Whiting/KOG, P Scanland 153-98-16-9-5-12H, t3/14; cum 238K 112/17;
25601, 1,461, Whiting/KOG, P Scanlan 153-98-16-9-11-16H3, t4/14; cum 83K 112/17;
25602, 2,631, Whiting/KOG, P Scanland 153-98-16-9-5-5H, t3/14; cum 281K 112/17;

This is what this area currently looks like:

One can tell from the map, that there is a lot more room for a lot more Scanlan wells.

I "wish" NDIC would make a distinction between "truly dry wildcats" and wells that were not completed due to operational issues, not that the well was "truly dry."

******************************

A Note For The Granddaughters

I remember when I was the manager for our high school football team. I was responsible for tracking rushing and passing statistics (among a whole of other things). I was never told how to do things, "just do it." (Nike.) So, when it came to passing, I tracked the yardage of the pass itself, and then the yardage gained after the pass. My coach thought I was nuts. He just wanted the "passing yardage," and he didn't want it broken down into two elements. I see now, the NFL and the television broadcasters break it down the same way.