For newbies, it might be advantageous to review the geology being discussed at this post (at the linked post, scroll down to the "geology").
A reader asked "whatever resulted from the Slawson wells that targeted the upper Bakken shale?"
In the linked post above to the June 16, 2012, entry, the Slawson wells were not specifically identified.
Going to "well search" at NDIC site, there are only two wells that fit that description:
- #16920, 216, Slawson, Piranha 1-4H, upper Bakken shale, one section, t3/08; cum 105K 8/14;
- #16401, conf, Slawson, Stingray Federal 1-32H, upper Bakken shale, two sections; t4/07; cum 195K 8/14;
Both wells are moderately successful and both wells are still active.
Scout ticket for #16920:
NDIC File No: 16920Scout Ticket for #16401
Well Type: OG Well Status: A Status Date: 3/24/2008 Wellbore type: Horizontal
Location: SWSW 4-146-104 Latitude: 47.490777 Longitude: -103.945780
Current Operator: SLAWSON EXPLORATION COMPANY, INC.
Current Well Name: PIRANHA 1-4H
Total Depth: 14145 Field: SQUAW GAP
Spud Date(s): 2/3/2008
Completion Data
Pool: BAKKEN Perfs: 10843-14145 Comp: 3/24/2008 Status: AL Date: 5/30/2008 Spacing: SEC
Cumulative Production Data
Pool: BAKKEN Cum Oil: 105133 Cum MCF Gas: 53912 Cum Water: 695
Production Test Data
IP Test Date: 3/26/2008 Pool: BAKKEN IP Oil: 216 IP MCF: 54 IP Water: 0
NDIC File No: 16401Some things to note:
Well Type: OG Well Status: A Status Date: 4/4/2007 Wellbore type: Directional
Location: NENE 32-147-104 Latitude: 47.514587 Longitude: -103.949908
Current Operator: SLAWSON EXPLORATION COMPANY, INC.
Current Well Name: STINGRAY FEDERAL 1-32H
Total Depth: 13952 Field: SQUAW GAP
Spud Date(s): 1/10/2007
Completion Data
Pool: BAKKEN Perfs: 10203-13952 Comp: 4/4/2007 Status: AL Date: 5/18/2007 Spacing: SEC
Pool: RED RIVER Comp: 4/4/2007 Status: DRY Date: 4/4/2007
Cumulative Production Data
Pool: BAKKEN Cum Oil: 194,761 Cum MCF Gas: 72265 Cum Water: 1290
Production Test Data
IP Test Date: 4/4/2007 Pool: BAKKEN IP Oil: 479 IP MCF: 195 IP Water: 100
- the "Bakken" is not otherwise specified, but the report clearly stated "Bakken shale" or "upper Bakken shale"
- the earlier well is described as a directional well; the older well, a horizontal well
- although it's possible I missed it, or did not understand the report, it appears these wells were not fracked
- despite the low IP (and particularly if they were not fracked), the total production has exceeded 100,000 bbls (though it has taken quite a bit of time)
Not stimulated, flat production, 6' of shale with minimal sideboard contribution multiple vintages, lateral lengths subsequent stimulations and far more than 2
ReplyDelete