- 16327, 786, MRO, Benz 14-21H, t9/10; cum 281K 12/16:
Pool | Date | Days | BBLS Oil | Runs | BBLS Water | MCF Prod | MCF Sold | Vent/Flare |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BAKKEN | 12-2016 | 31 | 4556 | 4612 | 2055 | 5061 | 4072 | 323 |
BAKKEN | 11-2016 | 30 | 3860 | 3824 | 1861 | 3286 | 2352 | 341 |
BAKKEN | 10-2016 | 31 | 6696 | 6731 | 3136 | 6758 | 5187 | 668 |
BAKKEN | 9-2016 | 30 | 6816 | 6844 | 3385 | 6450 | 4985 | 556 |
BAKKEN | 8-2016 | 31 | 7385 | 7369 | 3856 | 6947 | 5405 | 566 |
BAKKEN | 7-2016 | 31 | 7998 | 7977 | 4362 | 6321 | 4506 | 775 |
BAKKEN | 6-2016 | 30 | 8109 | 8248 | 4684 | 5845 | 3545 | 1252 |
BAKKEN | 5-2016 | 19 | 4474 | 4302 | 3699 | 3221 | 1670 | 961 |
BAKKEN | 4-2016 | 8 | 160 | 166 | 402 | 110 | 54 | 3 |
BAKKEN | 3-2016 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 528 | 18 | 0 | 0 |
BAKKEN | 2-2016 | 1 | 38 | 18 | 25 | 25 | 0 | 18 |
BAKKEN | 1-2016 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
BAKKEN | 12-2015 | 1 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 5 |
BAKKEN | 11-2015 | 24 | 1359 | 1347 | 494 | 1380 | 995 | 99 |
BAKKEN | 10-2015 | 31 | 1658 | 1681 | 584 | 1243 | 504 | 376 |
BAKKEN | 9-2015 | 30 | 1699 | 1707 | 560 | 1164 | 188 | 614 |
BAKKEN | 8-2015 | 31 | 1900 | 1837 | 568 | 1388 | 610 | 389 |
BAKKEN | 7-2015 | 31 | 1828 | 1859 | 587 | 1259 | 379 | 500 |
BAKKEN | 6-2015 | 30 | 1824 | 1944 | 603 | 1242 | 273 | 594 |
Graphic:
The graphic raises another obvious question. What about #16726?
*********************************
16726
Later. I completely missed this the first time when I was looking at the production profile for #16327. When I went to the map, I saw #16726, and I was curious about its production profile (I could almost guess). Here it is:
Pool | Date | Days | BBLS Oil | Runs | BBLS Water | MCF Prod | MCF Sold | Vent/Flare |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BAKKEN | 12-2016 | 31 | 4990 | 4997 | 2637 | 3952 | 3063 | 178 |
BAKKEN | 11-2016 | 30 | 5380 | 5325 | 2566 | 4299 | 3446 | 97 |
BAKKEN | 10-2016 | 31 | 5438 | 5522 | 2613 | 4200 | 758 | 2674 |
BAKKEN | 9-2016 | 30 | 5453 | 5468 | 2568 | 3447 | 0 | 2683 |
BAKKEN | 8-2016 | 31 | 4952 | 4883 | 2574 | 3399 | 731 | 1955 |
BAKKEN | 7-2016 | 31 | 7432 | 7411 | 4057 | 5754 | 3949 | 826 |
BAKKEN | 6-2016 | 30 | 7586 | 7665 | 4409 | 5648 | 3531 | 1125 |
BAKKEN | 5-2016 | 31 | 7633 | 7566 | 4876 | 6067 | 3903 | 1161 |
BAKKEN | 4-2016 | 30 | 7847 | 7866 | 5800 | 6417 | 5283 | 114 |
BAKKEN | 3-2016 | 27 | 5016 | 5064 | 5541 | 4464 | 3270 | 516 |
BAKKEN | 2-2016 | 29 | 11394 | 11279 | 11419 | 8858 | 4994 | 2476 |
BAKKEN | 1-2016 | 5 | 581 | 706 | 124 | 373 | 0 | 290 |
BAKKEN | 12-2015 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
BAKKEN | 11-2015 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
BAKKEN | 10-2015 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
BAKKEN | 9-2015 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
BAKKEN | 8-2015 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
BAKKEN | 7-2015 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
BAKKEN | 6-2015 | 1 | 1 | 230 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
BAKKEN | 5-2015 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
BAKKEN | 4-2015 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
BAKKEN | 3-2015 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
BAKKEN | 2-2015 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
BAKKEN | 1-2015 | 1 | 74 | 0 | 0 | 53 | 0 | 45 |
BAKKEN | 12-2014 | 18 | 307 | 0 | 245 | 371 | 219 | 25 |
BAKKEN | 11-2014 | 30 | 611 | 684 | 428 | 569 | 201 | 123 |
BAKKEN | 10-2014 | 30 | 665 | 700 | 515 | 680 | 382 | 51 |
BAKKEN | 9-2014 | 23 | 599 | 452 | 460 | 552 | 293 | 104 |
But in this case, it was a re-frack. It was fracked 12/10 - 12/2015, according to FracFocus. The file report shows that it was a 30-stage frack, 3 million lbs of sand re-frac. The reason this well was off-line so long was because a sundry report received November, 2014: "Marathon has decided to extend the lateral in this well prior to running a liner with frac sleeves in this wells beefore fe-fracing this well. The liner will be run from approximately 9,900' MD to the new TD at ~20,931' MD."
The initial frack was an open hole frack with 561,200 lbs of sand in late December, 2007.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.