Wednesday, March 30, 2016

Random Update On The Road To Germany -- March 30, 2016

Update

Germany’s switch to renewable energy sources is a success story. [Yes, that's the first line -- Germany's switch to renewable energy sources is a success story. Now the article goes on to say how this appears to be a "trainwreck." If this is how Handelsblatt defines a "success story," I sure hope Germany does not have something they would call a failure. Oh, that's right; they do: open borders.]
Ever since the country dedicated itself to a transformation of its energy supply following Japan’s Fukushima nuclear disaster five years ago, renewables have been booming. Last year, they accounted for a third of the energy consumed in Germany.
But while this success goes far in protecting the climate and environment, it has an economic downside. The electricity market has come apart at the seams.
While wind and solar electricity are being fed into the grid at set prices on a priority basis, natural gas- and coal-fired power plants, and soon nuclear power plants, are being forced off the market.
The price of electricity on the wholesale market has been in freefall for five years, plunging from €60 ($67.37) per megawatt-hour to the current €20.
The situation poses an existential threat for German operators of conventional plants like E.ON and RWE.
According to Trendresearch, a marketing research institute commissioned by Handelsblatt, the use of conventional power plants will continue to decrease. The gas- and coal-fired power plants and the nuclear power plants that remain on the grid will produce around 435,000 gigawatt hours of electricity this year.
Although that’s about two-thirds of the total German electricity production, the power plants were designed for 521,000 gigawatt hours. This means the utilization of their capacity is lagging around 17 percent below what they were designed for. By 2020, the gap between capacity and production is likely to increase to 23 percent.
The plunge in price is putting the heads of E.ON and RWE, Johannes Teyssen and Peter Terium respectively, in a predicament. With prices of €20, restructuring is in danger. When Mr. Teyssen decided to spin off the ailing power plants in 2014, the megawatt-hour of electricity was still at €33.
At the moment, the two executives are watching as their business is virtually imploding. First gas-fired power plants were forced off the market, then the black coal plants, and now low-priced lignite and even nuclear energy is struggling against being shut down.
While consumers are being forced to pay rising prices for electricity because of constantly higher taxes, fees and levies, the quoted rates on the wholesale market for electricity from coal, gas and nuclear power plants have been heading in the other direction for years. In recent weeks, they reached a dramatic low point that no manager would have thought possible.
At times, the price of electricity broke below the €20 per megawatt-hour mark on the futures market. Five years ago, before Germany’s energy transition was stepped up, the price was sometimes over €60. Since then, the market has been flooded with expensive wind and solar electricity.
Much more at the linked article.

The question I have: how does this play out? It appears that Germany runs the risk of conventional power plants being taken off line past the point that intermittent energy (wind, solar) can make up the difference.

What we have is this:
  • German consumers are paying more and more for home electricity
  • their conventional power plants may have to be taken off-line; some conventional providers may go broke
  • at some point, too many conventional plants not on-line, but intermittent energy neither adequate/nor dependable --> brownouts or worse
I honestly don't know how this plays out.

This was the ORIGINAL POST
 
Flashback: this was posted September 21, 2014:
Bloomberg is reporting:
When Germany kicked off its journey toward a system harnessing energy from wind and sun back in 2000, the goal was to protect the environment and build out climate-friendly power generation.
More than a decade later, Europe’s biggest economy is on course to miss its 2020 climate targets and greenhouse-gas emissions from power plants are virtually unchanged.
Germany used coal, the dirtiest fuel, to generate 45 percent of its power last year, the highest level since 2007, as Chancellor Angela Merkel is phasing out nuclear in the wake of the Fukushima atomic accident in Japan three years ago.
The transition, dubbed the Energiewende, has so far added more than 100 billion euros ($134 billion) to the power bills of households, shop owners and small factories as renewable energy met a record 25 percent of demand last year.
RWE AG, the nation’s biggest power producer, last year reported its first loss since 1949 as utility margins are getting squeezed because laws give green power priority to the grids.
“Despite the massive expansion of renewable energies, achieving key targets for the energy transition and climate protection by 2020 is no longer realistic,” said Thomas Vahlenkamp, a director at McKinsey & Co. in Dusseldorf, Germany, and an adviser to the industry for 21 years. “The government needs to improve the Energiewende so that the current disappointment doesn’t lead to permanent failure.”
While new supplies sent wholesale power prices to their lowest level in nine years, consumer rates are soaring to fund the new plants. Germany’s 40 million households now pay more for electricity than any other country in Europe except Denmark, according to Eurostat in Brussels. A decade ago, Belgium, the Netherlands and Italy all had higher bills than Germany.
“Politicians are often trying to kid us,” Claudia Fabinger, a 65-year-old self-employed marketing manager, said in between shopping for groceries on Leipziger Strasse in Frankfurt. “Our power bills keep rising and rising to fund clean energies; on the other hand, we are still polluting the air with old coal plants.” 
The entire article is a must-read. Go to the link to read the full article. As you read the article, remember: Germany accounts for 2.4% of all the CO2 emitted into the atmosphere. A lot of pain for making absolutely no difference. And now it seems, they don't even feel good about it.

The story above ... well, what can I say? It can't be much worse. But, actually it is. Just a few weeks ago, the Germans said this sacrifice was their gift to the world (at the linked post, scroll down to "tilting at windmills") (I can't make this stuff up):
I'm posting this for the archives. I assume no one will read the entirety of the linked article over at The New York Times. The article is on Germany's transition to renewable energy. It is costing the average German a lot of money, and there are questions whether the transition will even succeed. The article concludes:
“Indeed, the German people are paying significant money,” said Markus Steigenberger, an analyst at Agora, the think tank. “But in Germany, we can afford this — we are a rich country. It’s a gift to the world.”
I wonder if the average German is aware how little their efforts will result in anything meaningful. I wonder if the average German has looked at the graphic at the bottom of this article. Because it's always possible that the graphic will disappear some day, here are the data points.
Unrelated, but the thousands of folks who attended today's global warming march in NYC arrived in 500 diesel-burning buses. Not natural gas buses, or propane buses, or electric buses. But diesel buses.

SandRidge Eyes Bankruptcy; WMB To Lay Off !0% Of North American Workforce -- March 30, 2016

Reuters is reporting:
SandRidge confirmed on Wednesday it has hired advisers to evaluate options including a bankruptcy filing, in what could be the most high-profile reorganization yet in U.S. shale oil industry.
Williams (WMB) to lay off 10% of workers in North America.
Tulsa, Okla.-based Williams Cos. has begun laying off workers as part of its 2016 business plan, announced January 25.
The business plan aligns the company’s future growth with the realities of the current market. The company is laying off approximately 10 percent of its total workforce across North America.
Prior to the layoffs, the company employed 6,700 workers. The company began implementing cost reduction initiatives in 1Q 2016, which include postponing salary increases, significantly reducing or eliminating hiring in some areas of the company, reducing the number of contractors and reducing the use of outside services.
Layoffs will be completed this week and Williams will provide severance, including benefits and outplacement services to affected employees.
In September, pipeline giant Energy Transfer Equity announced it would buy Williams Cos. In a recent filing, Energy Transfer stated it plans to consolidate corporate offices in Dallas, which would reduce Williams’ presence in Tulsa and Oklahoma City.
Williams’ recent workforce reductions are “focused solely on sustaining Williams’ future growth and not related to the proposed merger with Energy Equity Transfer.”

Seventeen (17) Permits Renewed; Otherwise Not Much Activity -- March 30, 2016

No wells coming off the confidential list Thursday. There was no 31st day in September, 6 months ago.

Active rigs:


3/30/201603/30/201503/30/201403/30/201303/30/2012
Active Rigs3196194188205

Fifteen (15) wells approved for "tight hole" status, including fourteen (14) CLR Jersey wells.

Seventeen (17) permits renewed:
  • CLR (14), Jersey permits in Mountrail County
  • Whiting (2), two Bartleson permits in Mountrail County
  • Enerplus (1), a Morgan permit in Dunn County
No DUCs were reported as completed.

Saudi Arabia's Official Reserve Assets Fall Another $9 Billion In February, 2016

John Kemp, perhaps the best of the readily accessible energy analysts (with no hidden agendas as far as I can tell), has a number of tweets today with graphics depicting how severely Saudi Arabia has been impacted by the low price of oil. There are probably at least six such tweets with graphics. This one may be the best:


Another depiction, in a different format, cumulative change, has data only through January, 2015, at this post: http://themilliondollarway.blogspot.com/2016/03/one-new-permit-two-more-ducs-march-3.html.

You can see that prior to October, 2014, before Saudi opened the spigots, the +/- fluctuated around "0" suggesting that cash flow from continuing operations were meeting Saudi Arabia government's budgetary demands. However, by December, 2015, the crunch was beginning, with a negative cash flow of around $8 billion for the month.

The upside down "U" shape of the curve between February, 2015, and December, 2015, has me perplexed. I have some ideas, but not many.  It appears the upside down "U" may be starting again.

California CBR -- RBN Energy -- March 30, 2016

Considering CBR makes up only about 3% all oil that reaches California, it seems hardly worth it to go through this RBN Energy article, but there are some interesting data points now, and it's always possible CBR will increase at some point.

Data points from the article, written quickly and without much worry about grammar or format. I went through this quickly; there are likely to be factual and typographical errors. If this information is important to you, go to the source. Do not use these notes to make any financial, investment, travel, or relationship decisions.

Intro
  • neither CBR or terminal build outs have made much a dent in California's crude oil supply
  • December, 2013, height: 36,000 bopd; 2% of the state's 1.9 million bopd refining capacity
  • have since dwindled to a trickle
Recap: this is part 7 in RBN Energy's series on North American CBR in 2016
  • Part 1: CBR declines in response to narrower spreads between WTI/Brent; prior to that, congested pipelines resulted in spreads of $25/bbl which made CBR attractive; CBR grew from 33,000 bopd in January, 2010, to a peak of 928,000 bopd in October, 2014; now pipeline capacity has greatly improved
  • Part 2: looked at the epicenter of the CBR boom in North Dakota; slower-than-expected decline in rail shipments; take-or-pay; some routes to the East Coast and West Coast did not have pipeline
  • Part 3: CBR traffic out of the Niobrara;
  • Part 4: fate of CBR load terminals in western Canada that were overbuilt and underutilized
  • Part 5: CBR market destinations beginning with the East coast
  • Part 6: first of a two-part series looking at CBR unloading on the West coast with the Northwest refineries; those refineries continue to receive fairly significant shipments of CBR from North Dakota in the face of narrowing spreads between West Coast benchmark Alaskan North Slope (ANS) and WTI -- in part because Washington refiners are committed to term throughput contracts and railcar leases
  • Part 7: complete the West Coast review with a look at California CBR traffic and termainals
California
  • CBR incredibly small, even compared to Pacific Northwest
  • to less than 1,000 bopd in December, 2015
  • almost all CBR shipments into California came from PADD 2 -- assumed to be Bakken crude from North Dakota -- but were a trickle -- averaging 2,000 bopd over the year
  • 2013 was the "bumper" year for California CBR from Canada, about 3,700 bopd from the Bakken and 2,600 bopd from the Rockies (WY's Denver Juleburg Basin and Utah)
  • no reported Bakken imports in 2015
  • low spreads between ANS and Canadian benchmark Western Canadian Select pretty much shut off Canada, also
  • the only CBR shipment to California in 2015 came from the Rockies and from New Mexico; CBR shipments to CA from NM actually peaked in December 2014 at 6,400 bopd and likely consisted of Permian crude (WTI or West Texas Sour (WTS)).
California -- an island
  • net importer of crude oil
  • no pipelines from east of the Rockies or from the Northwest
  • CBR seems perfect except CA uses medium grade and heavier crudes vs light shale crudes from ND or west Texas
  • but the principal reason: painfully slow build out of rail unload terminals in California
CA CBR terminals
  •  reviews the five (5) largest CBR facilities
  • for a unit train to be economical, generally requires 100 or more rail cars at a time 
  • of the five terminals, only one is currently operating and is relatively small at 40,000 bopd
  • the other four in some state of limbo
CA terminals for pipeline, barge or truck
  • the list is not comprehensive, but the important ones
  • these terminals just as problematic as the CBR terminals
Bottom line
  • CBR terminals are not welcome in CA and getting a permit "is akin to finding a needle in a haystack"