$47.71→ | 8/15/2017 | 08/15/2016 | 08/15/2015 | 08/15/2014 | 08/15/2013 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Active Rigs | 56 | 31 | 74 | 194 | 185 |
Two new permits:
- Operators: Oasis, BR
- Fields: Banks (McKenzie); Sand Creek (McKenzie)
- Comments:
- EOG: twelve (12) Riverview permits; McKenzie County
- Whiting (5): one Crane Creek State permit, Mountrail County; one Dietz permit, Stark County; one Solberg permit, Stark County; two Zalesky permits, Stark County
- HRC (2) : two Fort Berthold permits, Dunn County
Slawson: one Atlantis Federal permit, Mountrail County - Enerplus: one Terrier permit, McKenzie County
- Sinclair: one Uran permit, Mountrail County
*****************************************
DAPL vs CBR
The graph tells me:
- the Bakken does not need the Keystone XL (but the Bakken never did need the Keystone XL)
- US refineries along the coast would love to have heavy oil from Canada
- Canada would love if western sands oil had additional access to US refineries along the US coast
- Venezuelan heavy oil = Canadian sands heavy oil
- actually, the Bakken would benefit a bit; Canada sands uses Bakken oil to help carry bitumen down a pipeline
**************************************
Greater Agricultural Yields Right Around The Corner
Warmists tell us two things:
- atmospheric CO2 will rise
- increased precipitation in temperate zones
Decades ago, as a college biology student, I spent one summer on the North Slope, Alaska, looking for ways to increase agricultural return on grasses in South Dakota.
It appears the answer was staring us in the face all these years (see linked article).
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.