Updates
Later, 9:22 a.m. CT: I made way too many errors in original post. I've left the comments in place, but have removed my terrible arithmetic. No excuses for all my errors. Thank you to all for pointing them out.
Original Post
Disclaimer: I often make typographical and/or factual errors. If this is important to you go to the source.
From the October, 2019, hearing dockets:
Case (not permit) 28056, CLR, Cedar Coulee-Bakken, on an existing 2560-acre unit, section 20/29/32-147-96; and, section 5-146-96; 22 wells; Dunn CountyThe graphics:
The existing wells:
- 22433, 667, CLR, Rodney 2-29H, Cedar Coulee, t1/13; cum 168K 7/19;
- 22435, 648, CLR, Rodney 3-29H, Cedar Coulee, t12/12; cum 151K 7/19;
- 22434, 738, CLR, Gale 2-32H, Cedar Coulee, t12/12; cum 263K 7/19;
- 22436, 1,070, CLR, Gale 3-32H, Cedar Coulee, t1/13; cum 223K 7/19;
- 17159, 811, CLR, Rodney 1-29H, Cedar Coulee, t8/08; cum 162K 7/19;
- 17211, 240, CLR, Gale 1-32H, Rattlesnake Point, t8/09; cum 146K 7/19;
Just saw you have 22 wells, not 27. That would be 480 ft spacing. 24 wells (if 22 plus parent) would be 440 ft spacing
ReplyDelete