This change will allow us to direct production resources to other online projects. But we will forge ahead with our aggressive reporting on environmental and energy topics......but doesn't say how. [To put this in perspective, apparently the NYT has eight (8) sports blogs.]
Wow, the comments are most interesting (as usual). This is one, but certainly not the best:
Blah, blah, blah. Saw the writing on the wall when you dumped your science reporters. I really can't understand why, in 2013, NYT would be choosing to allocate fewer rather than more resources into environmental coverage, when climate change and environmental degradation are surely the issues of our times.Go to the link, read the comments.
I wonder if the Green Blog was dumped so it would not have to report Obama's decision to approve the Keystone XL 2.0. KXL2.0 is the defining issue -- not the most important energy issue of his second term, but the "defining" issue -- of his second term.
