Sunday, July 26, 2015

Seven Of Eleven Bakken Wells Coming Off Confidential List Go To SI/NC Or DRL Status -- July 26, 2015

Monday, July 27, 2015
  • 28521, 562, EOG, Parshall 59-1608H, Parshall, ICO, t1/15; cum 46K 5/15;
  • 29048, SI/NC, BR, Teton 2-1-3MTFH, Camel Butte, no production data,
  • 30402, drl/NC, XTO, Lundin 14X-33E, Siverston, no production data,
Sunday, July 26, 2015
  • 27673, 1,040, Hess, EN-Leo E-154-94-2423H-5, Alkali Creek, t6/15; cum --
  • 28183, drl, XTO, Nelson Federal 21X-5B, Antelope, no production data,
  • 28672, 335, EOG, Parshall 82-2827H, Parshall, t1/15; cum 41K 5/15;
  • 28817, 818, Triangle, Simpson 151-102-5-8-1H, Elk, t3/15; cum 32K 5/15; choked back
  • 29973, drl/NC, Enerplus, Bobbin 149-93-04D-03H TF, Mandaree, no production data,
Saturday, July 25, 2015
  • 26774, drl, Zavanna, Double Down 24-13 4TFH, East Fork, no production data,
  • 29555, drl/NC, CLR, State Weydahl 4-36H1, Corral Creek, no production data,
  • 29673, drl/CNC, XTO, Werre Trust 44X-34G, Bear Creek, no production data,
  • 29801, dry, Ballard, Steen 44-20, wildcat, near the Glenburn/Chatfield oil fields, a Madison weel, about 20 miles NNE of Minot; no production data,
Active rigs:


7/26/201507/26/201407/26/201207/26/201107/26/2010
Active Rigs73193207180137

As a reminder to newbies: the number of active rigs does not necessarily correlate to oil production any more (if it ever did). I don't track active rigs for the purpose of tracking production. I track active rigs to get an idea of the amount of activity in the Bakken.

A Burr Under My Saddle -- July 25, 2015

I don't think I will link any of the articles or previous posts on this issue. It's not worth the time. But The Dickinson Press article suggesting that the fracking revolution led to an increase in high school dropouts got me thinking. LOL. Thinking. That's a dangerous thought.

The premise of the article was that high-paying jobs in the oil patch, specifically fracking, lured high school males to drop out of high school.

I doubt fracking companies hired many (any?) males (or females, for that matter) under the age of 18. This is dangerous work and if they hired anyone under 18, they were 17 years old, going on 18.

The number of 18-year-olds in high school is a fraction -- nay, a drop in the bucket -- of all students from eighth grade on, when dropping out of school begins.

But let's say it did. Let's say fracking led to the national high school dropout rate rising.

Think about that.

Fracking existed in a handful of geographic areas, most of them far from high-density urban areas where all these 18-year-old future dropouts would have been going to school. New York state bans fracking. I doubt many New York inner city, urban-rapping, Nike-wearing, boombox-carrying, Apple ear-bud wearing youth were catching the Greyhound bus to find fracking jobs in Pennsylvania. If for no other reason: it's hard, hard work.

But if higher pay lures 18-year-olds to drop out of school, imagine what $15 / hour for flipping hamburgers is going to do. Wow, wow, wow. Ninth-graders will start dropping out of school like flies on manure to get a $15/hour job. The seniors who supplement their meager social security income by working as Wal-Mart greeters will now be competing with hip 18-year-olds who will be more than happy to glad-hand folks walking into Wal-Mart for $15 / hour. [Which is still less, by the way, than the $17 paid at the Wal-Mart in Williston.]

And even if they don't drop out of school, the after-school work at McDonald's puts an end to extracurricular activities (which can be just as important as school itself) and puts an end to doing one's homework. No, this is not good.

Fracking comes and goes. It's not particularly stable work. The oil and gas industry is a cyclic industry. But McDonalds and Wal-Mart will go on forever providing minimum wage jobs for those who drop out of middle school and high school.

Fracking is hard work, very, very hard work in very, very miserable locations, in many cases. By comparison, jobs at McDonald's and Wal-Mart are about as "cushy" as one can find. Air conditioned, free food, inside job, no day longer than eight hours, days off every three or four days.

The researchers who contend that fracking led to an increased drop out rate may have stumbled onto something, and the key word there is: stumbled.

******************************
What $15 / Hour Means To A Tenth Grader

Updates

August 16, 2015: this will be a good site to follow over time. One can set the parameters. It will be interesting to see the 10-year trend line for work force participation of 16-year-olds once the minimum wage starts to gain traction. One would except, all things being equal, work force participation would decrease once the minimum wage exceeds the "norm."

Original Post
 
This is how a tenth grader breaks down $15/hour:
  • first week of the month: 40 hours x $15 = $600 -- easily pays for a car.
  • second week of the month: 40 hours x $15 = $600 -- easily pays for rent (two roommates sharing a $1200-apartment)
  • third week of the month: 40 hours x $15 = $600 -- 1/2 pays for food; other 1/2 discretionary
  • fourth week of the month: 40 hours x $15 = $600 -- all of it discretionary
No health care expenses: under ObamaCare, children stay on their parents' plan until age 26.
No cell phone expenses: remain on their parents' family plan.
Why stay in school? Living away from home and having $900/month free money.

Yes, I know taxes get taken out; social security gets taken out; Medicare gets taken out; there are other expenses, but none of this is seen by the tenth grader until he gets his first few paychecks and by that time he is out of school.

Natural Gas Pipelines Changing America; Saudi Arabia Investing In US, China Because Of A Shortage Of Gas -- July 26, 2015

Updates

Later, 11:33 a.m. Central time: after posting the note below, I ran across this story, which supports my these that the shale revolution in the US is huge, much bigger than I think most people know. Bloomberg is reporting: Saudi Arabia's Sabic is considering investing in shale gas in the US.
Saudi Basic Industries Corp., the world’s second-biggest chemicals manufacturer, plans to expand investment in U.S. shale gas projects through joint ventures.
Sabic, as the company is known, signed an agreement with Houston, Texas-based Enterprise Products Partners L.P. to get shale gas.
The company may use the feedstock in the U.S. or export it to other countries such as the U.K., he said. Sabic has converted crackers at U.K. plants to use shale gas as feedstock to produce olefins and their derivatives more competitively.
“The main areas in the U.S. we are looking to invest in are the northeast and the south as they fit our overall expectations including government support, labor laws and unions."
Sabic, which in 2007 bought General Electric Co.’s plastics unit for $11.6 billion, said in April it plans to expand in China and the U.S. because it’s difficult for the company to grow in Saudi Arabia due to a shortage of gas. The Marcellus shale formation spread across Pennsylvania, West Virginia and Ohio is America’s biggest natural gas producer, with output rising more than 14-fold since January 2007.
Oil and natural gas tend to be found together in the same areas of the world, although the mix (natural gas vs oil) will vary in different fields. But when I read that Saudi is expanding in the US and China because it’s difficult for the company to grow in Saudi Arabia due to a shortage of gas it catches my eye. The spokesman didn't say "an anticipated" shortage of gas, nor did he say a "slowing of production" of gas now or in the future, the spokesman said the shortage of natural gas already exists in Saudi Arabia. Its neighbors have a lot of natural gas. Interesting.

Original Post
 
I didn't post this story when it was sent to me by a reader a few days ago. I had a lot to do and this story has so many incredible story lines. BloombergBusiness is reporting that a glut of cheap natural gas trapped in the U.S. Northeast will be heading south by the end of the year, radically changing the price differences between the regions.

For me, the biggest story line is the huge advantage the US will have over the rest of the world with all its cheap energy.

I am not articulate enough to expand on all the story lines in the linked article, and even if I did, I do not have the time. I think I will just throw out some random, stream of consciousness thoughts that come up when reading this story.

The US will have a huge advantage compared to the rest of the world with all its cheap energy.

Europe will be left behind when it comes to energy. 

The US will, if not already, become the largest exporter of energy to the rest of the world.

The war on coal may have been started by a community organizer, but the war was won by roughnecks.

Despite a gazillion dollars to stop pipelines in this country, 1,000 miles of new pipeline was built for every one mile of pipeline stopped (for natural gas and for crude oil).

One of the largest US natural gas pipelines is now on-line. Interestingly, it does not flow west to east, but east to west.

There are only a few companies big enough to tackle these huge pipeline projects, sort of like franchise players on an NBA team: Williams, Kinder Morgan, Spectra, Sempra, and a few others.

After 2017, the renewable energy push is dead. Renewable energy won't be dead, but the "hype" will have ended. Even Jane Nielson might notice (but if she does, she won't talk about it).

Speaking of which, I think Harper Lee made a mistake publishing (or being talked into publishing) Go Set A Watchman. However, it was "made-to-order" under the current racial divisiveness in this country. Ironic. New York Times contributor on this story.

How incredibly spectacular the shale revolution was.

And how long it's going to last. Bentek said the Bakken would max out at 2.2 million bopd; data at that time of the Bentek study suggested new wells would be drilled through 2030, and the Bakken would last through 2100. With so much oil on the market now, it's very possible the Bakken production has topped out at 1.2 million bopd, and will stabilize at 750,000 bopd. That means the Bakken is going to last a lot longer than originally thought. And it's going to be developed at a much more moderated pace, making quality of life in the Bakken so much better.

The cost of energy will definitely be reduced across regions of the country. Manufacturers will move to states where states want them, and where there is a "right to work" regardless of whether one belongs to the right club or not. According to the article:
Spot gas in Florida is at $2.94 per million BTUs, while Marcellus supplies at the Leidy hub slumped to $1.26.
The difference between the two has averaged $1.48 this year and will shrink to about 30 cents as pipelines come online over the next three years, Franjie said. Tudor Pickering analyst Jeff Schmidt similarly forecast between 20 to 30 cents.
Let's keep it simple. Florida, $3.00 per unit; in the Marcellus, $1.25 per unit of natural gas. That's huge.

It's gonna get even cheaper to live in Florida -- BTW, no state income tax in Florida; can't say the same for frack-hating New York state.

Gas output has jumped more than 14-fold since January 2007, reaching a record 16.5 billion cubic feet a day earlier this summer. By the way, the North Dakota Bakken well that started the boom was in 2007. It was an EOG well in the Parshall oil field. How coincidental.

More staggering figures (can you say sayonara to "intermittent energy"?):
An expansion of Williams’s 10,200-mile (16,400 kilometer) Transcontinental Gas Pipeline system on the East Coast may enter service in December. Other proposals totaling as much as 7.5 billion cubic feet a day of capacity are scheduled to come online in 2016 and 2017. One billion cubic feet of gas is enough to heat about 10,000 U.S. homes for a year.
Florida power plant demand for fuel hit a record for April, up 13% from a year earlier. The state is 
home to six of the 20 fastest-growing US metropolitan areas. Can you spell "electoral college"?

Near the end of the article:
The shipments underscore how quickly the Marcellus shale formation -- spread across Pennsylvania, West Virginia and Ohio -- has dominated the gas market. It has become America’s biggest producer in less than a decade and is now spreading its wealth across the country.
By 2017, they say, because of the shale revolution and cheap energy, manufacturing costs in the US will be less than those costs in China.

By the way, EQT reported the biggest natural gas well ever in the Utica just a few days ago, and there are suggestions the Utica is much bigger than previously thought, and could be bigger than the Marcellus. Or maybe it already it. I can't keep track of them.

Finally, at the end of the article:
The pipelines coming online over the next three years will mark an “opening of the floodgates” to the U.S. Southeast.

The Problem With Intermittent Energy? Americans Like Dependable, Continuous Energy -- July 26, 2015

This is a great article on batteries.

Most readers are, no doubt, very familiar with the topic. However, the real importance of the article relates to keeping up with "politically correct" language in talking about energy.

We use to call wind energy and solar energy, "renewable energy." Which, of course, is ludicrous -- neither wind nor solar is "renewable." It's "simply there."

But now, GE is changing the category of wind energy and solar energy from "renewable energy" to something new: "intermittent energy."

That's right. "Intermittent energy." I can't make this stuff up. The problem with "intermittent energy," is that Americans like dependable, continuous energy. If Americans wanted intermittent energy they would move to Bangladesh, India, Kenya, or the Sudan (southern or northern, it wouldn't matter). Even North Korea for that matter.

If truth be known, the best category for solar energy and wind energy would be "redundant energy." Minnesotans are finding that out, "in spades," as they say.

Other category names for solar energy and wind energy:
  • nuisance energy
  • expensive energy
  • eyesore energy
  • Algore energy (my personal favorite) 
  • scam energy
  • boondoggle energy
  • DC energy (not "direct current," but as in "Washington, DC")
  • slicers and dicers (wind turbines)
  • KFC fryers (solar)
  • tortoise fryers (solar)
For the archives: write down your current electric rate bill on a piece of paper; place that note in an envelope, seal it, and write on the envelope: "Don't Open Until 2030." Compare the number you wrote down today with the new number in 2030 when you open the envelope. It will all be relative, of course. By then, the minimum wage will be $30/hour.

***************************
By The Way

This gives me an opportunity to opine on batteries from a different perspective.  I have more than a little bit of first-hand knowledge and/or interest in the subject. My son-in-law worked in management/research for a battery "start-up" company after his MBA, working in Boston, just down the street from A123. Readers know the story of A123 -- now owned by a Chinese company after going broke. At least I think they won't broke; if not, "pert near."

Which reminds me of Solyndra. Wow, remember those days? Stories coming fast and furious; bankruptcies, scams, boondoggles, federal money, for all that "intermittent energy." But I digress.

As long ago as ten years ago, maybe 20 years ago, Steve Jobs was one of the first, if not the first to talk often and openly and publicly about the need for better battery technology. My son-in-law, when at that start-up in Boston, told me where the research was headed (recently there was a story suggesting there might have been a "breakthrough" of sorts based on that research). While there -- let's call him Bill, to keep this simple; that's not his real name -- anyway, while Bill was working for that start-up company he visited many, many research labs around the world, including university labs, US military R &D, and commercial labs to include well-known companies working on batteries. The two biggest names with the most money being spent on battery technology, it appeared, based on Bill's comments, were Toyota and Apple. They were interested in his technology, but like the Shark Tank, wanted too much of his company in exchange for too few dollars.

Companies have been working on battery technology for twenty or thirty years. One begins to wonder.

There's a law in computer chips called Moore's Law, stated in 1965: the number of transistors per square inch on integrated circuits had doubled every year since the integrated circuit was invented.

But that's not happening with batteries. One wonders if the laws of physics precludes dramatic shifts in battery breakthroughs. One starts with the periodic table and there are only so many combinations of anions and cations.

Be that as it may, that's one of the reasons I am convinced the Apple Watch is important for Apple. It forces the engineers to get better and better with battery technology.  

New Managing Editor Over At The Dickinson Press? -- July 26, 2015

Stories from The Dickinson Press in the past two days:
All I can say: The Dickinson Press must have a new managing editor. Good stuff.

If not a new managing editor, certainly a new "critical" evaluation of the Bakken.

By the way, the "fracking leads to a higher dropout rate among high school students" story is ludicrous on the face of it. I doubt fracking companies were hiring many folks under the age of 18 years of age, and I assume the number of 18-year-olds still in high school is a drop in the bucket. Even my wife, who does not like fracking (don't ask), laughed at the story. I wonder how the new $15/hour minimum wage in NYC will affect the drop-out rate? Just asking? You can't have it both ways. (By the way, this fracking story is an old, old story; made the rounds some weeks ago; I had already posted it from another source. Maybe the new managing editor of TDP is reading the blog. LOL.)

With regard to Greece, North Dakota is laughing all the way to the bank. Even the new Spiritwood ethanol plant / lignite coal burning plant was financed with "green cards" through a program devised by Congress in 1992. Readers know my position on ethanol, but if free money is available, North Dakota has as much "right" to it as New York or New Jersey.

Some other data points:

Welfare spending, state and local spending only:
  • New York: $26 billion
  • California: $40 billion
  • North Dakota: $1 billion
States with most people on food stamps:
  • Washington, DC, #1
  • Mississippi, #2,
  • New Mexico, #3
Most dependent on federal government:
  • New Mexico, #1
  • Mississippi, #2
  • Kentucky, #3
The biggest US welfare states:
  • Minnesota, #8
  • New York, #7
  • Washington, DC, #6
  • Vermont, #5
  • Massachusetts, #4
  • Tennessee, #3
  • Maine, #2
  • and, the state ranked the biggest welfare state in this particular study: California, #1
Other, miscellaneous