Sunday, February 19, 2017

Nice Bump In Production In Two Whiting Chameleon Wells After Being Shut In For Less Than Two Months -- February 19, 2017

Nice bump in production after being off-line for less than two months:
  • 22621, 1,561, Whiting, Chameleon State 153-97-16-21-2H, Banks, t7/12; cum 122K 12/16; 
A update regarding this data is found at this post.

Monthly Production Data:
PoolDateDaysBBLS OilRunsBBLS WaterMCF ProdMCF SoldVent/Flare
BAKKEN12-2016318287832110044264691023316143
BAKKEN11-2016308796878312339281311172116320
BAKKEN10-2016103755370711821865735205108
BAKKEN9-201651274321656256100
BAKKEN8-20163182666910003953383030
BAKKEN7-2016318188891107360335028
BAKKEN6-2016308688861326397438768
BAKKEN5-201631910897125945103723694
BAKKEN4-201630958912106348534328437
BAKKEN3-2016301456159417596257611057
BAKKEN2-201628121013606303615350823
BAKKEN1-20163180646932221361939104

Nice bump in production after being off-line for less than two months:
  • 19859, 1,102, Whiting, Chameleon State 153-97-16-21-1H, Banks, t7/12; cum 145K 12/16; 
Monthly Production Data:
PoolDateDaysBBLS OilRunsBBLS WaterMCF ProdMCF SoldVent/Flare
BAKKEN12-20163161156141739719521753811890
BAKKEN11-20163064916479908720744863312021
BAKKEN10-20161121482171129551265348397781
BAKKEN9-20165273454150115211370
BAKKEN8-2016311699157711345942583019
BAKKEN7-201631184620041309675966588
BAKKEN6-2016301926203114326895675946
BAKKEN5-201630224922611847680454541261

The Market And Energy Page, T+30, February 19, 2017

Hard to believe it's been just 30 days since Donald J. Trump sworn in as president. I took a quick look at the front page of today's New York Times: the headline story was a congratulatory essay on all his successes in his first 30 days. Just kidding.

I'm still wading through the SeekingAlpha story on Whiting's wells in North Dakota. It would take a month of Sundays to do a really good job going through that analysis but hopefully we can have some fun with it. As "exhaustive" as that analysis was, I do think there are aspects of Bakken 2.0 that were not discussed, or at least not discussed in depth. It looks like the players to watch in the Bakken right now are Marathon, Oasis, and Whiting.

The other day I posted a link to this Rigzone story: can other basins ever catch up to the Permian's prosperity? I did not see much written about "prosperity" in the Permian in that article. I think the headline writer was looking for some alliteration. What I saw in the article was a lot of talk about "future activity." I don't understand why this is so surprising. Folks have to remember two things:
  • after paying upwards of $50,000 / mineral acre, public companies better start showing some kind of return on that investment; and,
  • they better start drilling if they want to "hold their leases by production"
This is exactly what was seen in the early days of the Bakken Boom, Bakken 1.0.

Blogging about the Bakken has taught me a lot. Perhaps the biggest lesson: don't invest in common shares in US shale oil companies. LOL.

But back to the linked article. "Upwards of $50,000 / mineral acre"? From the article:
Data from East Daley shows that acquisition prices in the Permian have returned to – and in some cases, exceeded – prices during the height of the shale revolution. Four Permian deals averaged roughly $29,000 per acre in 2014. While most of 2017 is still at hand, deals within the last year have exceeded $40,000 per acre. And in more recent months, M&A is still trending close to $30,000, according to East Daley’s data.
Recent deals in the Eagle Ford were priced close to $16,000 per acre, but in October, RSP Permian bought Permian acreage in the Delaware region for an estimated $48,000 per acre. And prices could go higher, said Darin Turner, Invesco Ltd. managing directorand portfolio manager.
“I could see somebody paying above that,” Turner said. “That can be very location specific [within the Permian], but we wouldn’t be that surprised to see a higher land cost.” 
Bad news for Saudi: of the major US shale oil plays, the biggest may be the Permian and operators can make money on $30-oil in the Permian. Saudi will go broke at $50 oil and only recently came out with a new budget based on $80-oil after years of a budget based on $100-oil. 

February 19, 2017 -- Active Rigs At 40

Active rigs:


2/19/201702/19/201602/19/201502/19/201402/19/2013
Active Rigs4038127186182

Prediction: A reader predicts 50 active rigs before summer.

Saturday, February 18, 2017

The Way The New York Governor Thinks When It Comes To Energy -- February 18, 2017

Keep energy prices artificially high:
  • ban fracking
  • ban new pipelines
  • shut down nuclear reactors
  • ban coal
  • "cap-and-trade"
  • over-regulate the energy sector
Help the poor pay for artificially high-cost energy:
  • expand subsidies for the poor using other people's money
Article here.

Whatever.

Back of the envelope (all assumptions except for one or two data points; use your own numbers if you want):
  • population of NY state (2015): 20 million (wiki)
  • 20 million / 1.5 people per household (assumption)
  • 13 million households (calculator)
  • Assume: 35% of households do not pay state taxes (another assumption) (after posting this, I thought it would be fun to google this -- result at this link; but I learned something new: New York City has an income tax, also; no wonder none of the San Antonio Spurs want to play for the New York Knicks)
  • 0.65 x 13 = 9 million tax-paying households (calculator)
  • total program benefits: $260 million (linked article)
  • amounts to $30/year/household -- the upper income will pay a great share (calculator)
  • so, we're talking about $12/year for an "average" household to pay for this program (comment)
  • doesn't amount to a hill of beans and it keeps the folks with pitchforks off your doorstep (comment)

Don't You Just Love It! -- The Political Page, T+29 -- February 18, 2017

This was an ad that accompanied the story on President Trump's rally in Florida, February 18, 2017, as published in The [London] Daily Mail.


**********************************
Lady In Red



Lady In Red, Chris DeBurgh


*********************************
Insanely Great

From Dan Neil's weekly automotive review in The Wall Street Journal. This week: Ford F-350 - the country boy's Rolls-Royce. Link here.

Best part of the story:
And here, dear readers, I mean to make you uncomfortable, especially those who scream bloody murder over tax credits for electric vehicles. This category of truck qualifies for an insanely generous federal tax credit to small-business owners who claim its use is more than 50% business-related.
Which in no way explains why you see so many of these guys launching pleasure craft down at the marina. Boats didn’t all of a sudden get heavier, you know.
In the case of our test specimen, it is possible to deduct the entire $78,585 in the first year of ownership under the Section 179 deduction privilege rules. You don’t find that the least bit Keynesian? [Note: the "credit" is a tax deduction as the writer says, but by using the word "credit," he caused a lot of confusion.]
Next best part of the story: the range is almost 700 miles. Yup, almost 700 miles between fill-ups. But the 48 gallons of diesel fuel will cost you about $100, about 15 pennies a mile.

But isn't this insanely great: "... it is possible to deduct the entire $78,585 in the first year of ownership under the Section 179 deduction privilege rules?

The Pickup Truck Song, Jerry Jeff Walker