Link here to SeekingAlpha.com.
In the Williston basin in North Dakota, we currently have over 310,000
net acres of significant resource potential, which we estimate to be
about 250 million net barrels. Our production in the basin has tripled
since we entered the area over 1.5 years ago. We have recently slowed
our drilling activity and significantly reduced our rig count in the
basin as a result of cost pressures. While well costs have subsequently
declined modestly, we will only increase our rig count when costs come
down enough to make returns competitive with the rest of our portfolio.
We believe that over the long term, our resource base in the Williston
basin represents a significant opportunity for the company.
A question (taken out of context):
You've added acreage in the Bakken. You've got a huge acreage position
in California. Presumably, it doesn't make sense to just sit on these
assets. Asset sales, joint ventures, bringing in others to drill this
stuff, is that part of the plan? Or practically speaking, what does it
really mean to cut CapEx when you've been building up these big acreage
positions over the years?
Answer (taken out of context):
So I view it as sort of a deferral mechanism, rather than just sort of
cutting it. But if they can't -- if they can't generate the returns in
some of the assets, we might farm some out to people who might operate
more efficiently.
***************
Question (taken out of context):
And I think it was a couple of years ago, you were pretty honest about
-- classically, you guys are an EOR company, not a shale drilling
company. You're now kind of again going after that same operational
execution ability. Do you have to acquire a company that can do this
stuff for you?
Answer (taken out of context):
No, I don't think so. It was 2 years ago, we had this exact conversation
in New York. And I said that, we were shifting the business from a --
for want of a better word, an EOR acquisition company/acquisition
company to something that was more operational and more traditional. And
I said that was not going to be easy, and I was right. And we've
lowered -- I don't know how to say it, the average experience level, I
guess is the politically correct way of saying it, of the people. And so
some more mistakes have been made than might otherwise have been made.
But I think we're getting there, I hope we're getting there. I'm just in
a hurry because I'm older than the average.
Go to the link to see the entire Q&A exchange. The analysts seemed concerned about OXY's experience in California. No real questions about North Dakota because OXY was more direct about that. But California leaves one with more questions, I think.