The well:
- 31757, 0, BR, Glacier 2-4 MBH, Clear Creek, t3/18; cum 197K 1/19;
NDIC File No: 31757 API No: 33-053-07169-00-00 CTB No: 231396
Well Type: OG Well Status: A Status Date: 3/21/2018 Wellbore type: Horizontal Location: SWSW 9-151-96 Footages: 340 FSL 610 FWL Latitude: 47.906233 Longitude: -102.981303 Current Operator: BURLINGTON RESOURCES OIL & GAS COMPANY LP Current Well Name: GLACIER 2-4 MBH Elevation(s): 2381 KB 2348 GR 2355 GL Total Depth: 20575 Field: CLEAR CREEK Spud Date(s): 9/10/2017 Casing String(s): 9.625" 1852' 7" 10939' Completion Data Pool: BAKKEN Perfs: 10939-20575 Comp: 3/21/2018 Status: F Date: 3/21/2018 Spacing: 2SEC Cumulative Production Data Pool: BAKKEN Cum Oil: 196728 Cum MCF Gas: 317689 Cum Water: 67864 Production Test Data IP Test Date: 3/21/2018 Pool: BAKKEN IP Oil: 0 IP MCF: 911 IP Water: 4976 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Monthly Production Data
|
A late bloomer?
ReplyDeleteRegular readers of the blog have this over and over (although I don't recall an IP of zero and then turning out to be this good. One can almost guess the operator based on the IP -- they are incredibly consistent. BR has incredibly good wells but consistently reports IPs less than 500. Statoil (now Equinor) used to be accuse of huge IPs, and then very mediocre wells. Some have similar thoughts of Hess, but I think over time Hess has gotten better and better wells. Equinor seems about the same. But MRO, it seems, consistently has "monster" IPs.
Delete