Monday, March 26, 2018

It Never Quits -- Now, Look At This - March 26, 2018

What do you think of this production profile?

PoolDateDaysBBLS OilRunsBBLS WaterMCF ProdMCF SoldVent/Flare
MADISON1-201829196319745867493348170
MADISON12-201731282228267182563354780
MADISON11-201730301829105999355034000
MADISON10-201718241320143080134612560
MADISON9-20172828186103351950
MADISON8-2017311852242108536980
MADISON7-2017311302081438887330
MADISON6-2017191892012918137180
MADISON5-201720369419397126611660

Pretty cool, huh? Production jumps 20-fold? [20 x 130 = 2,600].

From the sundry form received September 11, 2017:
Move in workover rig and pull rods and tubing. Nipple up frac tree and treesaver to isolate wellhead. Move in and rig up the frac fleet and frac well with approximately 14,000 bbls of gelled fluids containing approximately 400,000 lbs of the frack sand. Well will be frac'd pursuant ot NDAC 43-02-03-27.1. Nipple down frac tree and tree saver and run production equipment back into well. Return well to production.
But this isn't so great, really, is it? We see it all the time when a well is re-fracked.

And here's the graphic:



The well:
  • 19551, 215, Challenger Point Energy, LLC, Olney 2-25H, Flaxton, t5/11; cum 51K 1/18
But here's the kicker: it's NOT a Bakken. It's a Madison well. 

Don't believe me? Here's a screen shot of the scout ticket:


By the way, what's the best this well has ever done? From the very beginning:

MADISON9-201130159714632211335132010
MADISON8-201131194921112993437642210
MADISON7-201122214519724048338332730
MADISON6-201111157314772363148114810
MADISON5-201116176920273351174516600
MADISON4-201124232818185566166715470
MADISON3-20119500297839340

The sundry form / completion form with the completion data says the well:
  • had five laterals
  • was completed March 30, 2011
  • was tested May 6, 2011
  • there is no evidence this well was fracked at this time; first frack was apparently in 2017
Yes, it's the Madison -- and we saw it first in North Dakota -- LOL --

From Hairspray

No comments:

Post a Comment