Updates
September 20, 2015: production profile for this well updated:
- 21963, 4,447, HRC, Fort Berthold 148-95-26A-35-2H, Eagle Nest, application specified Three Forks but it appears to be a middle Bakken well, originally 1280-acre spacing; originally Petro-Hunt application, then G3; changed to 4 sections; this well is on a 6-well pad; most of the wells have similar production profiles; still lots of flaring, no geology report; 49 stages, 5.1 million lbs; t3/15; cum 80K 3/15;
Pool | Date | Days | BBLS Oil | Runs | BBLS Water | MCF Prod | MCF Sold | Vent/Flare |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BAKKEN | 7-2015 | 31 | 17994 | 18134 | 11307 | 17100 | 14901 | 1982 |
BAKKEN | 6-2015 | 29 | 19674 | 19547 | 12215 | 18356 | 15658 | 2495 |
BAKKEN | 5-2015 | 15 | 14437 | 14549 | 7318 | 13305 | 12509 | 691 |
BAKKEN | 4-2015 | 30 | 41425 | 41400 | 18849 | 40867 | 38314 | 2343 |
BAKKEN | 3-2015 | 31 | 68893 | 69049 | 32649 | 66141 | 58038 | 7886 |
BAKKEN | 2-2015 | 24 | 11391 | 10953 | 8347 | 7799 | 7440 | 191 |
Original Post
- 21963, 4,447, HRC, Fort Berthold 148-95-26A-35-2H, Eagle Nest, application specified Three Forks but it appears to be a middle Bakken well, originally 1280-acre spacing; originally Petro-Hunt application, then G3; changed to 4 sections, no geology report; 49 stages, 5.1 million lbs; t3/15; cum 80K 3/15;The HRC Fort Berthold well produced more oil in one month than the "best well in the basin" to date:
Pool | Date | Days | BBLS Oil | Runs | BBLS Water | MCF Prod | MCF Sold | Vent/Flare |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BAKKEN | 5-2015 | 15 | 14437 | 14549 | 7318 | 13305 | 12509 | 691 |
BAKKEN | 4-2015 | 30 | 41425 | 41400 | 18849 | 40867 | 38314 | 2343 |
BAKKEN | 3-2015 | 31 | 68893 | 69049 | 32649 | 66141 | 58038 | 7886 |
BAKKEN | 2-2015 | 24 | 11391 | 10953 | 8347 | 7799 | 7440 | 191 |
- 27520, 6,002, Whiting, Flatland Federal 11-4TFH, Twin Valley, 97 stages, 4.2 million lbs, t10/14; cum 311K 3/15;
Pool | Date | Days | BBLS Oil | Runs | BBLS Water | MCF Prod | MCF Sold | Vent/Flare |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BAKKEN | 5-2015 | 27 | 28754 | 29152 | 3567 | 130024 | 129332 | 640 |
BAKKEN | 4-2015 | 30 | 36976 | 37084 | 4012 | 67961 | 67354 | 547 |
BAKKEN | 3-2015 | 31 | 46708 | 46286 | 4808 | 181103 | 180141 | 900 |
BAKKEN | 2-2015 | 28 | 46881 | 47420 | 4187 | 146103 | 143797 | 2250 |
BAKKEN | 1-2015 | 31 | 52430 | 52198 | 4093 | 141901 | 128516 | 13323 |
BAKKEN | 12-2014 | 31 | 52103 | 51904 | 3664 | 123971 | 115165 | 8744 |
BAKKEN | 11-2014 | 30 | 50823 | 51268 | 4155 | 112069 | 42428 | 69581 |
BAKKEN | 10-2014 | 31 | 61727 | 60615 | 12213 | 117291 | 11381 | 105860 |
BAKKEN | 9-2014 | 27 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 44 | 0 | 0 |
Think of all the story lines:
- middle Bakken vs Three Forks
- significant difference in IPs
- first month production vs record second month protection
- 91 stages vs 49 stages
- similar amounts of proppant
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.