Tuesday, February 26, 2013

Only Three (3) New Permits Today But Several Producing Wells Now Completed

Active rigs: 182 (steady)

Three (3) new permits --
Operators: OXY USA (2), Zenergy
Fields: Crooked Creek (Dunn), Glass Bluff(McKenzie)
Comments: well, that was easy.
Wells coming off confidential list were reported earlier; see sidebar at the right.

Producing wells that are now completed:
  • 21518, 710, CLR, Lawrence 5-13H, North Tioga, t1/13; cum --
  • 23567, 356, Whiting, McNamara 42-26XH, Sanish, t1/13; cum --
  • 23060, 763, Hess, LK-M Elisabeth 147-97-1522H-4, Little Knife, t2/13; cum --
  • 23319, 1,271, BEXP, Porter 35-26 1TFH, Alexander, t1/13; cum --
  • 22619, 781, CLR, Sorenson 2-21AH, Alkali Creek, 4-section spacing; t2/13; cum --
  • 22971, 1,103, Whiting, Rodney Olson Federal 42-8-2TFH, t1/13; cum --
  • 22620, 946, CLR, Thronson 2-28AH, Alkali Creek, t2/13; cum --
  • 22618, 907, CLR, Thronson 1-28AH, Alkali Creek, t2/13; cum --
  • 23048, 606, CLR, Chicago 3-26H, Banks, t1/13; cum --
  • 21980, 569, CLR, Florida 1-11H, Camp, t1/13; cum --
The two Thronson wells are on the same 4-well pad as the Sorenson well.  The fourth well on that pad (#22617, another Sorenson well, is on DRL status). The four wells are long laterals on 4-section spacing.

Check Out These BNSF Figures -- As Provided By KFYR

KFYR is reporting:
"We knew that the Bakken was big. But like many people, we didn`t know exactly how big. But we ramped up very quickly and in accordance with what the customers were telling us and what the experts were telling us about how big the reserves were," said John Miller with BNSF.

BNSF started exporting crude oil from western North Dakota in 2008. It started carrying 1.3 million barrels a day. Within four years, its export volume jumped to 100 million barrels a day.

"We`re real pleased with the growth in crude oil by rail on BNSF. And we`re still excited about the growth for the future," Miller said.

2012 was a big year for rail in North Dakota. Exports increased by 36 percent. And the reason rail is having so much success is because trains can reach coastal refineries that will pay more for oil.
For newbies: North Dakota produces about 750,000 bbls of oil per day. 

Something tells me the story will be corrected. A "screenshot" has been taken, just in case.

How Big Is The Canadian Oil Sands -- Motley Fool

Link here to Motley Fool:

Data points:

Production estimates (one London firm) for the Canadian oil sands:
  • 1.7 million bopd in 2013
  • 4.2 million bopd in 2025
The Kesystone XL would accommodate about 800,000 bopd. Many, many story lines there.

Stock recommendations (for investors):
Tyler recommends Suncor Energy, the largest oil sands producer in Canada, and goes on to pitch ConocoPhillips, which has gone all-in with the Canadian oil sands. ConocoPhillips will spend a large portion of its 2013 capex there through joint ventures with Total.
Disclaimer: this is not an investment site. Do not make any investment decisions based on what you read at this site.

For Investors Only: Overview of Oasis, Year-End, 2012 -- Steve Zachritz -- Z Man

Link here to SeekingAlpha.com.

At the link:
Oasis Petroleum reported better than expected EIBTDA on pre-announced 4Q12 production. This is our pre-call note.

While 4Q12 production was pre-announced Oasis Petroleum exceeded consensus expectations for revenue and EBITDA and EBITDA per BOE hit $64.49 /BOE in the quarter, a new high. Strong cost control and contribution from the company's well completion segment offset sequentially lower oil prices (WTI averaged ~ $88 per barrel in the quarter, the lowest quarterly average of 2012). Moreover, given management's propensity for shying away from dilution, OAS recorded another new high in terms of production per share (see table at the bottom of this piece). While the name has risen from a 20 month sleepy period described in our last piece it continues to trade near its lows on an enterprise value to production basis (see graphs below).
And then this:
We often refer to Oasis as the "easiest to own name among the Bakken players". Costs continue to trickle lower and we expect 2013 to be a year of "beat and raise" as the quarters roll by. We continue to own the name as a top 5 ZLT position. On a forward TEV/EBITDA basis, the name trades at 5.8x 2013 estimated EBITDA and 4.4x 2014's number, which given the growth, the oiliness, and the resulting strong margins we find to continue to be appealing and augers for a move over the next 12 months above the $50 mark. 
Disclaimer: this is not an investment site. Do not make any investment decisions based on anything you read here. 

RBN Energy: Back to the Future

Updates

Later, 10;04 am: just after posting the original post, Bernanke delivered "the Fed" speech. Very upbeat remarks for the market but this talking point: consumers are being hammered by high price of gasoline. Cue up Connie Francis.   

Original Post

I keep coming back to Canadian oil sands, $60; Bakken, $75 - $100; WTI, $100; Brent/OPEC: $120.

I think of the recent Oil Drum article: the Precautionary Principle.

And finally, this article: imports from Saudi Arabia increased in 2012.

Those three data points/articles came to mind when I saw the RBN Energy post today: bridge over troubled waters.
The Deepwater Horizon explosion in April 2010 effectively halted new drilling in the offshore Gulf of Mexico (GOM). Between April 2010 and June 2012 production fell by 400 Mb/d.
At the same time the shale revolution led to increases in US production – up 790 Mb/d during 2012 – the largest annual increase on record. In the last quarter of 2012 GOM oil production began to recover and is forecast to increase to 1.5 MMb/d by the end of 2014. Today we look at the impact Macondo had on GOM crude production.
The April 20 2010 BP Macondo disaster had a momentous impact on the Gulf Coast regional crude oil production. The Federal government ordered a six-month moratorium on new deepwater drilling in US offshore waters (deepwater is considered to be greater than 500 feet deep). The moratorium also required existing permitted wells to stop drilling. The moratorium was lifted in October 2010 but it wasn’t until February 28, 2011 (314 days after Macondo) that the Interior Department approved the first new deep water drilling permit for an oil company.
[An aside: I remember blogging about the permitorium, the moratorium, and then the slow-rolling, receiving a lot of comments that I was wrong. RBN Energy summarizes that period very succinctly. Nice to see.]

Had there been no shale revolution during the events in the Gulf, things could be a lot worse. But the thing that jumps out at me, when drilling in the Gulf was shut down, there was no Plan B. The shale revolution was not a Plan B; it was simply fortuitous.
US crude oil production topped 6 MMb/d by the end of 2012 up by 790 Mb/d during the year - the largest increase in annual output on record. Most of that increase was in the Bakken, Eagle Ford and Permian basins. Prior to the shale revolution increases in US crude production between 2007 and 2010 came from offshore GOM fields.
The Macondo accident in April 2010 halted GOM crude production growth and it is only just beginning to recover. The recovery proves that deepwater drilling risks are still considered worth taking by producers. GOM offshore production may not be headline news like shale oil but it still represents 20 percent of US production and that number looks set to increase in the next two years.
By the way, that's an interesting data point: the GOM represents 20 percent of US production; the Bakken represents about 12 percent. 

***************

Note to self: 76