Updates
October 5, 2017: wells in Chatfield oil field have been updated.
October 21, 2015: update on two Chatfield wells. At the moment, Chatfield is a two-section oil field.
Permits
2015
31307, conf, Ballard, Barton Trust 31-30, Chatfield,
31222, conf, Ballard, Fines 14-19, Chatfield,
31118, conf, Ballard, Fines 23-19, Chatfield,
31117, conf, Ballard, Nelson 33-19, Chatfield,
29807, 352, Ballard, Nelson 34-19, Chatfield, t3/15; cum 39K 8/15;
29622, conf, Benergy, Borstad 30-3, Chatfield,
2014
27319, 600, Ballard, Fines 24-19, Chatfield, t6/14; cum 66K 8/15;
Original Post
This is really, really cool. Subtle, but cool. A Madison update. A writer reminded me about the Madison with a recently reported well:
- 27319, 600, Ballard Petroleum, Fines 24-19, t6/14; cum 9K 7/14;
The "stratigraphic correlation chart" is located here. See also the North Dakota Geological Survey site. At that link scroll down/search "Wayne."
The Madison Group has been divided into a number of informal, wireline log-defined intervals (Harris and others, 1966; Voldseth, 1986). In ascending order, they are the Bottineau, Tilston, Landa, Wayne, Glenburn, Mohall, Sherwood, Bluell, Coteau, Dale, Nesson, Midale, Ratcliffe, and Poplar intervals. Hendricks (Hendricks-1988)subdivided the Ratcliffe interval into several subintervals, the Berentson, Alexander, Flat Lake, Charles C, Lustre, and Eggebrecht.I did not find the Chatfield oil field on GIS map server. The scout ticket says the well is in the Chatfield oil field:
NDIC File No: 27319 API No: 33-009-02354-00-00 CTB No: 127319If this is a new oil field, it is the first new oil field since the Cottonwood oil field, to the best of my knowledge.
Well Type: OG Well Status: A Status Date: 6/2/2014 Wellbore type: Vertical
Location: SESW 19-159-81 Footages: 660 FSL 1980 FWL Latitude: 48.576280 Longitude: -101.181315
Current Operator: BALLARD PETROLEUM HOLDINGS, LLC
Current Well Name: FINES 24-19
Total Depth: 4700 Field: CHATFIELD
Spud Date(s): 2/27/2014
Pool: MADISON
Later: this is really quite exciting. Ballard has two more wells in the same general area, both on confidential. The Fines well is in section 19-159-81. The other two Ballard wells on confidential are 6 to 10 miles north in township 160-81.
- 27703, conf, Ballard, Middaught 33-23, wildcat, 23-160-81;
- 27704, conf, Ballard, Drovdal 13-2, wildcat, 2-160-81;
************************************
Later, see first comment below. As of this date, from the NDIC website, some selected formations, cumulative production, number of wells, and average production/well to date:
Bakken: 831,017,850 bbls / 7,353 wells = 113,017 bbls/wellThe current Bakken boom in North Dakota began in 2007. The heyday of the Madison wells was back in the 60's and 70's I believe. The Red River came a bit later but even now is producing some incredibly good wells. (I could be very wrong on the relative timing of Madison wells vs Red River wells.)
Bakken/Three Forks: 3,590,399 bbls / 34 = 105,600 bbls/well
Madison: 939,049,431 bbls/ / 5567 = 168,681 bbls/well
Red River: 110,277,553 bbls / 736 = 149,834 bbls/well
Red River B: 149,294,668 bbls / 550 = 271,445 bbls/well
The vast majority of Bakken wells are less than five years old.
***********************************
A Note to the Granddaughters
I am really, really enjoying Judith Nies' 2014 Unreal City: Las Vegas, Black Mesa, and the Fate of the West. The book provides a superficial, but informative, history of Hopi/Navajo conflicts, the Mormons, coal, water, and the growth of Phoenix, Los Angeles, and Las Vegas in the 1950's. I first mentioned the book a few days ago. It is a short book, and so easy to read, one could read it in one setting, but it is so enjoyable to read, I wish it would not end, and that's why I'm reading it slowly. It reads like a very, very long New Yorker article.
I probably wouldn't have posted this, but I needed a music video to re-charge my blogging batteries.
This is not my favorite version, but it is said to be "vintage," and I'm a sucker for "vintage":
I probably shouldn't post this. Spoiler Alert: this will ruin your memories of this song:
For the archives:
- a growing list of northern California communities that may run out of water in less than 60 days (are their golf courses still open?)
- daily allocation of water per house?
- harvest much smaller than normal
Who or what are "Mormans" (sic) ?
ReplyDeleteMormans are Mormons misspelled. Thank you for catching that. As noted in the welcome/disclaimer, my notes are generally not proofread for several days; I count on my readers for catching typographical errors. This one I should have caught; spellchecker caught it and I scanned through it too quickly.
ReplyDeleteThe good news is that if you google "Mormans," which I always do when I come across something I don't understand, wiki will lead you to Mormons.
I wish you had caught my misspelling of my home town (Wiliston) which you can still see at:
http://themilliondollarway.blogspot.com/2014/09/ten-10-wal-mart-18-wheelers-every-day.html
if you are quick enough. I'm in the process of correcting it now. And that was in the SUBJECT line. Where one can find most of my typographical errors. LOL.
Why do you say IP comparable but EUR will be less? Do you have evidence that the Madison well will decline faster than a Bakken one? [Would think the opposite.]
ReplyDeleteJust my 2 cents worth. I have no formal training in the oil and gas industry. This well has a spacing unit of 40 acres, I believe. The typical Bakken well now has a spacing unit of 1280 acres. The size of the spacing unit is just one of several (at least 6) factors that will affect EUR.
DeleteThe reader (first comment) is absolutely correct if my inference is correct. This is a huge IP for a Madison well. After going through a fair number of Madison wells, an IP of 600 suggests this well could have a huge EUR, easily exceeding 1 million bbls based on past Madison experience.
DeleteI made the mistake of taking the "average" Madison well. In fact, there were a lot of DRY Madison wells, and a lot of small producing Madison wells that really affect the average.
But the reader is correct: this could be (should be) a huge Madison well. A huge congratulations to Ballard is in order.
It will be "fun" to see how this plays out. I really appreciate the reader's comment; made me go back and take another look.
I do not understand why the Minot local newspaper has not picked up on this new oil discovery in Bottineau County?Its very close to Minot and (could) become a huge story for the Madison Formation if more oil is found north of Glenburn.
ReplyDeleteI doubt if the readers would understand ...
Delete