Updates
December 9, 2018:
- 20201, 803, CLR, Whitman 2--34H, Oakdale, t9/11; cum 1.623 million bbls 10/18; this well just came back on line:
Pool | Date | Days | BBLS Oil | Runs | BBLS Water | MCF Prod | MCF Sold | Vent/Flare |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BAKKEN | 10-2018 | 31 | 12158 | 12190 | 3987 | 13439 | 11887 | 1133 |
BAKKEN | 9-2018 | 30 | 13999 | 14197 | 6835 | 15432 | 14036 | 1011 |
BAKKEN | 8-2018 | 4 | 2075 | 1375 | 1231 | 2073 | 1580 | 443 |
BAKKEN | 7-2018 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
BAKKEN | 6-2018 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
BAKKEN | 5-2018 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
- 20208: still off line;
- 20211: still off line;
- 20212, 482, CLR, Whitman 3-34H, Oakdale, t9/11; cum 260K 10/12; API: 33-025-021261; according to FracFocus, it was re-fracked 9/23/17 - 10/5/17, with 9.8 million gallons of water, with water 84% by weight and proppant 15% by weight; a sundry form in the file shows that the re-frack was 61 stages and 14.5 million lbs of sand; a Three Forks frack; which is interesting because this was originally a Middle Bakken well; the Three Forks horizontal was a re-entry well drilled in July, 2017; the IP for the re-entered Three Forks horizontal was 1,006 bopd;
Pool | Date | Days | BBLS Oil | Runs | BBLS Water | MCF Prod | MCF Sold | Vent/Flare |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BAKKEN | 10-2018 | 31 | 37074 | 36992 | 10813 | 39302 | 35611 | 3272 |
BAKKEN | 9-2018 | 30 | 36826 | 36625 | 14331 | 38670 | 34010 | 4265 |
BAKKEN | 8-2018 | 4 | 4731 | 4441 | 2378 | 4621 | 3785 | 786 |
BAKKEN | 7-2018 | 1 | 67 | 67 | 84 | 4 | 0 | 3 |
BAKKEN | 6-2018 | 1 | 1 | 138 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
BAKKEN | 5-2018 | 0 | 0 | 403 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
BAKKEN | 4-2018 | 16 | 3239 | 3127 | 473 | 2465 | 2376 | 0 |
BAKKEN | 3-2018 | 19 | 5486 | 5631 | 756 | 4317 | 4139 | 50 |
BAKKEN | 2-2018 | 25 | 5310 | 5088 | 595 | 4445 | 4261 | 0 |
BAKKEN | 1-2018 | 31 | 10513 | 10725 | 1869 | 8937 | 8641 | 50 |
Original Post
I can't recall if I've updated this information, but my curiosity was piqued by a recent comment from a reader.
This is a CLR four-well pad in Oakdale oil field. These are incredible wells, so I was surprised to find that three of them were off-line. Backtracking through the four, this one came up last:
- 20212, 482, CLR, Whitman 3-34H, Oakdale, t9/11; cum 260K 10/12; API: 33-025-021261; according to FracFocus, it was re-fracked 9/23/17 - 10/5/17, with 9.8 million gallons of water, with water 84% by weight and proppant 15% by weight; a sundry form in the file shows that the re-frack was 61 stages and 14.5 million lbs of sand; a Three Forks frack; which is interesting because this was originally a Middle Bakken well; the Three Forks horizontal was a re-entry well drilled in July, 2017; the IP for the re-entered Three Forks horizontal was 1,006 bopd;
Pool | Date | Days | BBLS Oil | Runs | BBLS Water | MCF Prod | MCF Sold | Vent/Flare |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BAKKEN | 11-2017 | 30 | 19452 | 19809 | 5379 | 19667 | 18479 | 968 |
BAKKEN | 10-2017 | 21 | 12150 | 11401 | 6847 | 13549 | 7191 | 6268 |
BAKKEN | 9-2017 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
BAKKEN | 8-2017 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
BAKKEN | 7-2017 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
BAKKEN | 6-2017 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
BAKKEN | 5-2017 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
BAKKEN | 4-2017 | 5 | 380 | 363 | 98 | 115 | 114 | 0 |
BAKKEN | 3-2017 | 6 | 157 | 320 | 0 | 108 | 99 | 0 |
BAKKEN | 2-2017 | 4 | 162 | 170 | 0 | 174 | 0 | 158 |
According to FracFocus, the other three wells on this pad have not been re-fracked. These three wells remain off-line or have just recently come back on-line. I expect they will be brought back on line within the next few months if not already back on-line (NDIC data lags field operations by about two months).
The other three wells:
- 20208, 960, CLR, Hawkinson 2-27H, Oakdale, t9/11; cum 449K 2/18;
- 20210, IA/803, CLR, Whitman 2-34H, Oakdale, t9/11; cum 1.5947 million bbls; off-line as of 10/17; updated 2/18;
- 20211, IA/263, CLR, Hawkinson 3-27H, Oakdale, t9/11; cum 385K 11/17; off-line and inactive as of 6/17; updated 2/18;
Disclaimer: whenever I see something that does not make sense or cannot be easily explained, I wonder if I am mis-reading something or making typographical/factual errors. There may be significant mistakes on this page. If this is important to you, go to the source.
The graphic:
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.