Friday, November 21, 2025

Random Look At Phoenix Wells And Re-Fracked Devon/Grayson Mill Wells Permitted One Year Ago -- November 21, 2025

Locator: 49766B.

Of the wells permitted one year ago, I was most interested in:

  • Phoenix Operating results; and,
  • the re-fracked Devon/Grayson Mill wells in Bear Den.

Phoenix Operating:

  • pretty good results considering the location of these wells;

One of several re-fracked Devon / Grayson Mill wells in Bear Den:

  • 29658, A/AL, Devon/Grayson Mill, Moberg Federal 149-95-29-32-13HLW, Bear Den, re-frack, t5/24; cum 392K 9/25; initially a high IP and holding fairly well;
    • comments: 
      • the initial numbers following the re-frack were much, much better. 
      • I believe the re-frack stimulation data has not yet been reported at the NDIC site. I could be wrong, but I did not see it. If the production profile continues, it suggests that Devon brought in a "new" well for the cost of fracking.  
      • not all will agree with my thoughts; that's fine. 

Full production since the re-frack:

PoolDateDaysBBLS OilRunsBBLS WaterMCF ProdMCF SoldVent/Flare
BAKKEN9-20252943974439519030614265713923
BAKKEN8-2025314217416448061850117742639
BAKKEN7-20253157845665587720578169233535
BAKKEN6-20252963356446645643532404942919
BAKKEN5-20253177977651719447328458831321
BAKKEN4-20253081008436664431365299381308
BAKKEN3-202531100171000980143883938065650
BAKKEN2-2025288377867266722760427185307
BAKKEN1-20252467766433629029699285481055
BAKKEN12-2024311157811450970344938436741148
BAKKEN11-2024301221912133982843787337529915
BAKKEN10-2024311477114924116534878648098564
BAKKEN9-2024301791817830143415228051617543
BAKKEN8-20243122261223801583851432482813027
BAKKEN7-20243124882247751912043287409392224
BAKKEN6-2024302754327458340514456543545906
BAKKEN5-20241518178183492862923850140199773
BAKKEN4-20240000000
BAKKEN3-20240000000
BAKKEN2-20240000000
BAKKEN1-20240000000
BAKKEN12-20230000000
BAKKEN11-20230000000
BAKKEN10-20237386483162903278625
BAKKEN9-2023301666171279643744150224
BAKKEN8-202319649723512238523850
BAKKEN7-20233114231213192411438350

Compare those initial production numbers after the re-frack with the original frack back in 2015:

BAKKEN3-20162967936305180383677410721
BAKKEN2-2016287337756817831058193231006
BAKKEN1-201631793478281943882338234721
BAKKEN12-201531752774221679757045992692
BAKKEN11-20153081268538179596428411961
BAKKEN10-20153110318986222861297911702998
BAKKEN9-201530131191331529031773916480989
BAKKEN8-201531106131047127421218811777133
BAKKEN7-2015319777987923991125493821594
BAKKEN6-2015301042110421271712311106691373
BAKKEN5-201531146261488142131598882237487
BAKKEN4-2015301879618590725521796192842241
BAKKEN3-2015161718616811821326624210275454

The initial numbers following the re-frack were much, much better. 

I believe the re-frack stimulation data has not yet been reported at the NDIC site. I could be wrong, but I did not see it. If the production profile continues, it suggests that Devon brought in a "new" well for the cost of fracking.  

Posted by at