The well:
- 18435, 2,376, off line since 10/18; t3/11; cum 308K 7/19; active as of 4/19;
Pool | Date | Days | BBLS Oil | Runs | BBLS Water | MCF Prod | MCF Sold | Vent/Flare |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SANISH | 7-2019 | 31 | 4241 | 4338 | 4408 | 2702 | 2693 | 0 |
SANISH | 6-2019 | 30 | 4215 | 4159 | 5369 | 2984 | 2977 | 0 |
SANISH | 5-2019 | 14 | 1400 | 1312 | 2633 | 927 | 924 | 0 |
SANISH | 4-2019 | 2 | 227 | 210 | 477 | 214 | 213 | 0 |
SANISH | 3-2019 | 0 | 0 | 45 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
SANISH | 2-2019 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
SANISH | 1-2019 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
SANISH | 12-2018 | 1 | 6 | 12 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
SANISH | 11-2018 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
SANISH | 10-2018 | 6 | 393 | 739 | 90 | 767 | 761 | 0 |
SANISH | 9-2018 | 25 | 1769 | 1864 | 494 | 3537 | 3526 | 0 |
Another example.
The well:
- 34058, 541, BR, Kermit 8-8-32MBH, Pershing, t8/18; cum 160K 7/19;
Pool | Date | Days | BBLS Oil | Runs | BBLS Water | MCF Prod | MCF Sold | Vent/Flare |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BAKKEN | 7-2019 | 31 | 26219 | 26205 | 10327 | 44035 | 26427 | 16199 |
BAKKEN | 6-2019 | 30 | 28955 | 28856 | 8542 | 45230 | 33515 | 10373 |
BAKKEN | 5-2019 | 12 | 10715 | 10611 | 3030 | 16489 | 13619 | 2240 |
BAKKEN | 4-2019 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
BAKKEN | 3-2019 | 0 | 0 | 109 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
BAKKEN | 2-2019 | 1 | 136 | 145 | 95 | 272 | 241 | 0 |
BAKKEN | 1-2019 | 31 | 13464 | 13449 | 5157 | 18619 | 4139 | 13905 |
BAKKEN | 12-2018 | 31 | 16973 | 16983 | 5671 | 17743 | 2551 | 14704 |
BAKKEN | 11-2018 | 30 | 20180 | 20185 | 6629 | 17394 | 3389 | 13540 |
BAKKEN | 10-2018 | 31 | 25746 | 25910 | 10193 | 17416 | 6118 | 10762 |
BAKKEN | 9-2018 | 25 | 16663 | 16381 | 7222 | 7879 | 5542 | 1539 |
BAKKEN | 8-2018 | 14 | 662 | 662 | 6988 | 1930 | 1233 | 0 |
Another example.
The well:
- 18138, 1,161, CLR, Simmental 1-21H, Elm Tree, t12/09; cum 341K 7/19;
Pool | Date | Days | BBLS Oil | Runs | BBLS Water | MCF Prod | MCF Sold | Vent/Flare |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BAKKEN | 7-2019 | 12 | 1221 | 1208 | 356 | 1683 | 0 | 1438 |
BAKKEN | 6-2019 | 27 | 4501 | 4768 | 2906 | 6641 | 285 | 5837 |
BAKKEN | 5-2019 | 31 | 8467 | 8683 | 4722 | 13084 | 1172 | 11305 |
BAKKEN | 4-2019 | 30 | 9165 | 8974 | 8211 | 12871 | 1957 | 10299 |
BAKKEN | 3-2019 | 15 | 4646 | 4291 | 8249 | 6215 | 2521 | 3410 |
BAKKEN | 2-2019 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
BAKKEN | 1-2019 | 0 | 0 | 259 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
BAKKEN | 12-2018 | 31 | 1382 | 1381 | 413 | 3050 | 2340 | 93 |
BAKKEN | 11-2018 | 30 | 1394 | 1285 | 374 | 2921 | 2199 | 107 |
BAKKEN | 10-2018 | 31 | 1448 | 1433 | 425 | 3126 | 2418 | 93 |
Nothing has been proven on halo effect unless there is a proper analysis. Some statistical comparison of shutins versus adjacent fracs for instance. Just cherrypicking wells that seem to show a phenomenon is not "proof". Are there other wells that don't show a jump? How many of each? Also, you don't even show a long history after the jumps (how fast does it come down).
ReplyDeleteOkay.
Delete