I could care less / couldn't care less about ESG but look at this: Texas appears to be leading the nation in renewable energy. Does any state produce more renewable energy for its own consumption (not for exporting to neighboring states)?
ESG - solar - wind: a bit risky in the winter, but that's being resolved. We'll never see another "bad" energy day in Texas, and to the best of my knowledge, we've only had one event that was all that bad.
Tea leaves suggest analysts outside of Texas don't understand the reason for energy demand in the state.
By the way, is 25 - 30 GW of continuous power more than the total amount of energy (all sources) consumed by New England?
Previously posted:
Most expensive, to least expensive, selected states; in bold red: New England and New York:
- Connecticut: 26.48 cents; hates pipelines, up a whopping 16.7% from a year ago
- Rhode Island: 25.69 cents, up 6.6% from a year ago
- California: 25.59 cents; up 13.6% from last year;
- New Hampshire: 22.15 cents; hates pipelines; up a whopping 14.9% from last year
- New York: 21.58 cents; hates pipelines; up a whopping 14.9% from last year
- Maine: 20.95 cents; hates pipelines; up an incredible 29% from last year
- New Jersey: 15.77 cents; down 3.7% from last year
- Pennsylvania: 14.48 cents; lots of natural gas, up 10.7% from a year ago
- Texas: 12.28 cents, down 3.6% from a year ago
- North Dakota: lots of coal, 9.64 cents; lots of coal, up 1.9% from a year ago
No comments:
Post a Comment