Updates
June 3, 2015: in the original post below I link a Zacks story with SRE. Here is an update from Seeking Alpha, this date:
- Sempra Energy says it has signed an MOU with Woodside Petroleum to begin discussions and assessments for the potential development of Sempra LNG's proposed Port Arthur liquefaction project in Port Arthur, Tex.
- The Port Arthur project would be designed to include two natural gas liquefaction trains with a total export capability of ~10M metric tons/year, or 1.4B cf/day, as well as LNG storage tanks and marine facilities for LNG ship berthing and loading.
Original Post
The first thing I noted: no Bakken crude oil derailments were reported in the last 24 hours.
The next thing, "Breaking News" linked at the blog reports an 8.5 magnitude earthquake in Japan; no additional details. When that was being reported on "Breaking News" about 7:30 a.m. CT, it had still not been reported over at Drudge, The Los Angeles Times, or Fox News. Still no update. I assume this story will attract little US attention a) if there is no tsunami; b) if there is no nuclear reactor destroyed; and, c) if the earthquake was not caused by fracking. [Update: deep, and off-shore, never mind; Tokyo shook; all of Japan felt it.]
I see that my credit card company website is down; can't connect. Happens rarely with this particular credit card company. I will have to pay my bill later.
This is most incredible; happens every month like clockwork. Within 24 hours of any particular month coming to an end, the car companies report their sales for that month. By Monday, 8:30 a.m., we will know the car sales for GM, Ford, and all the rest. And yet it will take three months for the US government to report crude oil imports. The government should have an estimate even before the crude oil is delivered; something called customs. Meanwhile, the bureaucrats -- and some of them are very, very clever -- have that data three months before the rest of us. But with the private sector automobile companies, we have their data within 24 hours, about the same time everyone else gets it.
And the story looks really, really good. Reuters is reporting:
Estimated sales of 1.6 million new cars and trucks in May would make for a seasonally-adjusted annual rate of 17.4 million vehicles, according to Edmunds.com, a car buying platform.
"This is going to be one of the best months ever," said David Kudla, chief investment strategist of Mainstay Capital Management in Grand Blanc, Michigan. Kudla sees May sales approaching $40 billion, not far from the $40.3 billion record in August 2014.
Weak auto results contributed to flat overall retail sales in April, but May is expected to represent a rebound. Lower gas prices could boost demand for sports utility vehicles and trucks, which have higher price tags and better margins.
There is also pent-up demand for new vehicles as consumers have been holding on to their cars for longer since the financial crisis. The average age of U.S. cars is now between 10 and 11 years.
So, we'll see.
I see a headline (did not read the story) that the Greeks are ready to compromise, could "seal a deal" this week.
So, we'll see.
Okay, now to a couple of fun stories. First, still over at Yahoo!Finance -- what dads want for Father's Day: beef. I find that interesting because I have a "love affair" with Omaha Steaks. I now make more purchases form Omaha Steaks for others (my two daughters and their families) than I do for myself. I've pretty much quit eating Omaha Steaks (for awhile) but still buy for my daughters and granddaughters. Oh, how funny, while typing the above, the linked story was downloading. I had no idea what the story was going to be about, and here it is, at the link:
Wow, I feel vindicated. I thought I was crazy with regard to my Omaha Steak love affair.In a recent survey, 80% of dads say they would like steaks for Father's Day and 57% of them will be grilling on that "special" day. And yet, only 9% are likely to receive the gift of red meat, according to Todd Simon, senior vice president of Omaha Steaks, a family-owned company that his great-great grandfather founded in 1917.
Father's Day is "our Second Christmas," Simon says and the company has launched an ad campaign this year aimed right at the hearts and stomachs of dads everywhere.
So, we'll see.
Then this story. I'm not interesting in Abercrombie & Fitch but there was a story line in the linked article that caught my interest. I probably spend as much time in Starbucks as anyone else, and have a pretty good feel for the demographics. I am always impressed with how much teenagers in some parts of the country have; I think folks would be surprised how many teenagers I see in Starbucks in this area. I noticed it some time ago, and was going to blog about it, but never got around to it, and never all that interested, I guess. Just an observation. And here, Business Insider is reporting:
Researchers found that today's teens are increasingly spending on technology and food instead of clothing.
For the first time in history, teens are spending as much on food as they are on clothing, according to the analysts at Piper Jaffray. This is fueled by trendy coffee drinks at Starbucks, the top food retailer among the demographic.
Many teens are also more concerned with having a new iPhone than a name-brand T-shirt, according to the survey.
So, let's see. Google starbucks teenagers. Let's see what pops up. First hit, from NBC News, way back in September, 2007:
Kamyra L. Harding never gives her son coffee or soda, and rarely opts for treats such as chocolate cupcakes. But about twice a month, the mom does give in to her 4-year-old son Garrett David Brand’s request for a Chai tea latte from Starbucks.
“People here already know us,” Harding said on a recent visit to a Starbucks on New York's Upper West Side. “They know we want extra milk.”
Garrett has been a regular Starbucks customer since “he could hold a cup,” his mother says. Now when he passes a Starbucks he says, “I want to buy this tea.”
Starbucks, keenly aware of the pitfalls of being seen as trying to lure kids to drink sweet, caffeinated beverages, has for years insisted that it does not market to children — even as stroller traffic jams build outside some stores and teenagers pack others.
Now, however, the company is revising its stance on kids, acknowledging that the under-18 set has become part of the coffee chain’s customer base.I'm at the Target Starbucks this morning. Heavy rain in the area so I am biking close to home. Four tables; mostly takeout. The only other table occupied right now: one mother with her two daughters. I estimate the older daughter is 13 years old; the younger is 9 years old. The mother went shopping; the girls are having Starbucks breakfast.
Another 17-y/o (or thereabouts) teenager is at the counter, ordering.
And so, it goes. These teenagers: lifelong customers. Same thing we see with regard to Apple and iPhones. Lifelong customers. And they upgrade every two years, passing their older phones down to their 8-y/o siblings.
Second hit, teen are spending all their money at Starbucks, not clothes, Huffington Post:
Remember when you were a teenager and you hung out at the mall all the time? The teenage landscape looks very different these days. Teens are over the mall and they're into restaurants.
A study by Piper Jaffray released on April 8 reveals that teens are now spending more on food than they are on clothing. It's the first time that food has trumped fashion since the study started. Since spending on food occurs less by e-commerce and more in person, most food expenditures necessarily take place at food establishments -- hence the rise of restaurants and the fall of the mall.
In 2014, American teens visited the mall an average of 29 times per year, down from 38 times in 2007. "Quietly, the restaurant has displaced the mall as the socially acceptable place to hangout for teenagers in America."Now, back to that Business Insider story, the story that was posted in the past 48 hours. It turns out that story was based on a Piper Jaffray study that was posted at the Huffington Post last April, 2014. More than a year ago.
Talk about recycling news.
A lot of stories on oil. Gloom and doom. Or opportunity. Depends.
For me, it's a long, long story, going back to the early (or was it the late?) 1980's when I was first looking at individual stocks to buy. My first purchase ever, that I recall, was Burlington Northern -- I don't know what it was called then, or the ticker symbol -- but I remember vividly watching a BNSF train (if that's what they were then?) go by the restaurant we were in while visiting Fargo, ND. It was a long, long coal train. It was then and there I decided to buy shares in that railroad. I can't say for sure it was my first individual stock that I bought (I had only invested in mutual funds prior to that) but it was certainly among the top five.
I also bought shares in two utilities at the time; one went bankrupt a long, long time ago; the other is still one of my better holdings. Since this is not an investment site, I won't get any more specific. Along the way, I continued to follow utilities -- SRE was one of them -- again, no recommendations one way or the other or whether I have invested in SRE in the past or not but it has always intrigued me, being located in southern California somewhere. I see California as a highly regulated state and a state that might not treat its utilities very well, so it has been interesting to watch how nimble SRE has been responding to the changing energy environment. I often compare it to MDU.
Zacks has a long article on SRE today. Oh, there it is, based in San Diego. I am intrigued with this company because of its natural gas relationship with Mexico.
This post is long enough. Time to press on.
Oh, how funny. A mom with her two daughters (or one daughter and a friend) has just stepped up to the Starbucks counter. The girls are about 14 years old, it appears. The mother will have a coffee of sorts; the girls a trendy drink of sorts. Lifelong customers. (They are here in Grapevine/Euless/Colleyville for a volleyball tournament. They won their first game, and now have a break before their next game.)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.