Sunday, September 14, 2014

Did CLR Just Crack The Code North Of Williston? Will Report A Huge Well Monday -- September 14, 2014; 9 Of 11 (9/11) Wells Go To DRL Status

Monday, September 15, 2014:
  • 27554, drl, XTO, Walton Federal 41X-19, Bear Den, no production data, 
  • 27586, drl, CLR, Melgaard 5-14H1,  Sadler, no production data,
Sunday, September 14, 2014:
  • 26476, drl, CLR, Rochester Federal 6-24H, North Tobacco Garden, no production data,
  • 27138, drl, MRO, Lantz 24-32TFH, Reunion Bay, no production data,
  • 27496, drl, Hess, EN-L Cvancara-155-93-2627H-4, Robinson Lake, no production data,
  • 27580, drl, BR, Sequoia 41-4TFH,  Hawkeye, no production data,
Saturday, September 13, 2013:
  • 27225, drl, Hess, BW-Kraetsch-149-99-1423H-3, Cherry Creek, no production data,
  • 27545, 739, CLR, Knox 1-16H, Winner, middle Bakken at 9,655 feet; 30 stages; 3.4 million lbs sand + ceramic; interesting: neither unusual number of stages OR unusual amount of proppant; geology report not yet filed; t6/14; cum 44K 8/14;
  • 27553, 3,645, XTO, Walton Federal 41X-19H, Bear Den, t9/14; cum 27K 9/14;
  • 27579, drl, BR, Sequoia 31-4MBH, Hawkeye, no production data,
  • 27832, dry, CLR, Jersey 29-6H, Alkali Creek, no production data,
****************************************
CLR is going to report this well tomorrow. None of the wells in the immediate area even come close to the production numbers in the first two months. In fact, most of the wells in this area are "just ok." This well is north of Williston, in Williams County, near Divide County. It will be interesting to learn more about this well.
  • 27545, see above, CLR, Knox 1-16H, Winner, 13 days spud to total depth; a huge well,  
PoolDateDaysBBLS OilRunsBBLS WaterMCF ProdMCF SoldVent/Flare
BAKKEN8-20143010878109021577295949416178
BAKKEN7-20143121374214253498317163132133950
BAKKEN6-201420117161105926807920109201

*********************************
Global Warming And Tilting At Windmills

I'm posting this for the archives. I assume no one will read the entirety of the linked article over at The New York Times. The article is on Germany's transition to renewable energy. It is costing the average German a lot of money, and there are questions whether the transition will even succeed. The article concludes:
“Indeed, the German people are paying significant money,” said Markus Steigenberger, an analyst at Agora, the think tank. “But in Germany, we can afford this — we are a rich country. It’s a gift to the world.”
I wonder if the average German is aware how little their efforts will result in anything meaningful. I wonder if the average German has looked at the graphic at the bottom of this article. Because it's always possible that the graphic will disappear some day, here are the data points. 
G-20 countries are largely liable for keeping this from happening, as they contribute about 85 percent of global carbon emissions. This chart shows the breakdown by country, with China coming in at a whopping 27.6 percent, and the U.S. trailing close behind at 16.7 percent:
  • China: 28%
  • US: 17%
  • Germany: 2.4%
  • UK: 1.5%
  • France: 1.1%
  • Italy: 1.1%
  • Other EU: 5.1%
  • India: 5.6%
  • Russia: 4.8%
  • Japan: 4.0%
  • Canada: 1.7%
  • Other: 16.4%

2 comments:

  1. "•27545, see above, CLR, Knox 1-16H, Winner, a huge well"

    Based on the max treatment rate and fluid volume pumped it sure looks like a slickwater frac

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes, I assume so, based on that and their most recent corporate presentation:

      http://themilliondollarway.blogspot.com/2014/09/some-data-points-from-clrs-most-recent.html


      Could add as much as $2 million to cost of completing the well.

      I'm mostly interested in two things: a) how many stages; and, b) did they go as high as the EOG wells with sand?

      Delete