- the bureaucratic error occurred under President Clinton
- Gulf of Mexico leases at issue were signed from 1996 - 2000
- followed on the heels of a 1995 law intended to encourage drilling by dropping fees when oil prices were low; and reinstating them when prices rebounded (floors and ceilings)
- bureaucratic error: leases signed in 1989 and 1999 failed to include price thresholds that would trigger royalty payments when prices rose
- "100s of producers" benefited from this oversight
- top winner: CVX -- avoided $1.49 billion in royalties; out of $2.62 billion total of all company royalty avoidance
Interestingly enough, the industry raised the issue.
“We renegotiated these leases at the time that the concerns were first raised,” Davy Kong, a spokesman for ConocoPhillips, said in an e-mail. “That agreement terminated when the courts ruled that under the law authorizing royalty relief -- the Deep Water Royalty Relief Act of 1995 -- the department did not have the authority to impose price triggers. ConocoPhillips accepts the court’s decision and has no further plans to address the issue.”And it gets better. You all know about "leases held by production." It is estimated that the five companies who profited most from this bureaucratic oversight may yet produce the equivalent of 1.6 billion bbls of oil. And no royalties to be paid.
The Bush government, in 2006, asked that the companies voluntarily re-negotiate the leases.
Apparently that offer is still on the table. As my daughter would text, LOL.
[For "anonymous," if you want to defend the government's actions, write your congresswoman. Or the Supreme Court.]
Imagine that, a Republican administration giving away the country's resources to oil company cronies for pennies on the dollar, followed by a mostly Republican-appointed Supreme Court backing up the corporate cronies. OOps, we forgot. We're sorry. We tried. That settles it. Move along.
ReplyDelete[The original post said this occurred under the Bush administration. That was incorrect. Bush tried to correct the problem.]
DeleteI erred. Neither of us checked the facts. Bloomberg mentioned President Bush who asked the companies to renegotiate.
It was interesting that Bloomberg mentioned "Bush" but failed to mention who was president when the bureaucratic botch occurred. (I made the error because I was trying to be fair and balanced, saying mistakes happen under all presidents, but in this case I was trying to be TOO fair and balanced.)
The bureaucratic botch occurred when President Clinton was entertaining Monica. Or vice versa.