Today, I counted 13.
And then this from Occidental's 4Q11 transcript:
In the Midcontinent and other operations, we plan to spend about 14% of our total capital. In the Williston, we have increased our acreage in 2011 from 204,000 acres to 277,000 acres. We expect that our rig count will be about 6 at the end of 2012. Additional capital that could reasonably be deployed here has been shifted to higher-return opportunities in California and the Permian. This may also encourage Bakken well costs to decline.Maybe someone can clarify that. I suppose the "13" to "15" wells listed as OXY USA rigs could be contracted and the "6" that the transcript refers to are the company's own rigs, but I certainly interpret that paragraph to say that OXY is re-deploying to areas (like California) with higher return potential.
Maybe I'm misreading something. But OXY has always been focused on California.
This comes on top of the CHK story I just posted.
On the other hand, COP seems to like the Permian and the Bakken:
So now I'll shift to our progress in growing our liquids-rich shale business in North America. That's the Eagle Ford, the Bakken, the Permian and the Cardium plays. First, at Eagle Ford, we are currently running 16 rigs in the play. We expect to maintain a 16 rig count average and drill about 180 wells in 2012. Production in late December was around 50,000 BOE per day, and we continue to see some impacts from curtailments related to infrastructure constraints as a result of the higher well volumes and the increasing liquid content and just our ongoing development activity. We would anticipate that average production from the Eagle Ford should grow to around 100,000 BOE per day by the end of 2012. In the Permian, in the Bakken, we are running a total of 12 -- 10 rigs and expect to increase this by as much as 50% during 2012. The fourth quarter production at the Permian and Bakken averaged 50,000 BOE per day and 18,000 BOE per day, respectively.
So theyplan on having only 6 by the end of the year. They can't finish all there leases in time then could they
ReplyDeleteI don't know. As noted, I update results on a daily basis, and I'm not going back farther than 2010 (with occasional exceptions).
DeleteI had always been a fan of oxy previously. Even tried to get hired on ...twice! I remember thinking WOW! when oxy news broke they were coming to Nodak. I was thinking cool, another international player, I was still a fan. You would believe someone who was over in Oman and was able to deal with the difficulties of an overseas operation could easily handle stateside ops.
ReplyDeleteand then some oxy well data came in, IP's. I was not impressed especially not when comparing to Whiting, Brigham, Kodiak. I don't blame the guys tripping pipe and getting dirty. But starting to believe either their geophysicists can't get it right, or they are right in rock they should be and the well designers are FU, crap fracking design with inadequate fluids, sand, stages etc. They can't figure out how to get the consistent high numbers. Drilling is half science and half art that has been proven. Look at fracking from 5 years ago and how it is now, huge differences. Other players are years ahead of them in figuring it out. I suggest they partner up with say.. Kodiak and learn how to put those lease acres into HIGHER production. Just my opinion.