Updates
July 29, 2012: in addition to notes in the original post from the conference call, this exchange was recorded from the conference call and posted at another site:
Steve, you did mention some bolt-on acreage acquisitions in the Williston, can you just talk about where your position is now? I know, you dropped some rigs, and I think, you’ve been less enthusiastic but where are you acreage-wise now in the Williston?If OXY does indeed have more than 300,000 acres in the Bakken, that is significant. Early in 2011, they had 200,000 acres; at end of 2011 they had 277,000 net acres in the Bakken. So, going from 200,000 to 300,000 net acres in the Bakken this past year is noteworthy. [OXY entered the Bakken by purchasing Anschutz 188,000 net acres in 2010.]
Stephen I. Chazen – President and CEO: I think we’re north of 300,000 acres.
Original Post
For quite some time I have questioned the "poor" initial production (IPs) numbers recorded by OXY USA.Occidental, itself, is on record as saying that the Bakken is expensive, it has better prospects, and, although it won't be leaving the Bakken, it will be cutting back in the Bakken.
And, then yesterday, or today, I forget, I posted a stand-alone suggesting that OXY's IPs are improving.
Then this, tonight, it is being reported that the OXY chairmen, Steve Chazen is quoted as saying:
".... much of the company's increase in production, which was at a record level in the second quarter, came from the Bakken Shale."Wow, who would have guessed? As noted, the Bakken never fails to surprise.
I find it impressive that he even mentioned the Bakken. In the last conference call, I don't think it was even mentioned, until the Bakken came up in Q&A, and then it was pretty much avoided. It certainly sounded like the Bakken was the poor stepdaughter for this company.
OXY is a $70 billion (market cap), international company. If "much of the company's increase in production, which was at a record level in the second quarter, came from the Bakken Shale" what does that say about the Bakken-centric companies like CLR (market cap: $12 billion) and WLL ($5 billion). OXY has about 200,000 net acres in the Bakken; CLR, almost a million; and, Whiting, around 700,000 net acres. The numbers are changing, but in 2011, Whiting and OXY each had about 15 active rigs; CLR, 24 active rigs, in North Dakota.
So, I was pretty much blown away by OXY's CEO saying that much of OXY's record production can be attributed to the Bakken.
The source of the comment is at Rigzone.com. Other data points:
- the company will decrease total number of rigs from 75 to about 70
- pace of drilling will not slow down; they will drill as much as they have with fewer rigs
- they plan to increase CAPEX for 2012 more than planned
- CAPEX will increase about a billion dollars, from $8.3 to $9.2; a little more than half of the increase will go toward the Al Hosn Shah gas project
- don't expect any M&A activity; they have time to wait; in no hurry
Me thinks OXY's notoriously low IPs are reflecting Held By Production, while the OXY team figures out which approach to field maximization is best. Some of the most experienced operators had no experience with nucleated crude...everything takes time and study, variables change based on experience...
ReplyDeleteAs you've noticed, their IPs are creeping up. Production numbers are not yet impressive, but it certainly looks like a learning curve to me also. I'm just impressed they mention "the Bakken" in their conference calls.
Delete