Updates
Later, 10:18 a.m. Central Time: See link at first comment below. The narrator at that video does a really, really good jub, but "we" don't think of these as "bad roads" but really, really "good ideas." The feeder roads are awesome and a little sporty; not having fences is really, really cool and are really quite important (counterintuitive?). Beltways around the cities are very, very clever; I first saw them in San Antonio. Not exactly sure how beltways have made floods worse. Urbanization made floods worse, but it wasn't the beltways. Population growth was made possible by Texas' transportation system? Austin took just the opposite tack: did not expand its transportation system like the rest of Texas. The city continued to grow and now has one of the worse transportation problems. But the video is really, really good -- gives a great overview of Texas highways. Once you figure them out, they are clearly the best in the nation.
Original Post
I've talked often of all the construction going on north of DFW airport, between Grapevine, TX, and on up to Carrollton, Plano, Frisco, McKinney. All of a sudden I'm seeing a huge project being developed along Texas Highway 121 between Grapevine's historic downtown and the airport (DFW). I know we are getting a new water park but this looks like a much bigger project and it's not quite in the spot I expected. So I asked the old-timers I run into at Starbucks.
I've been told that Grapevine is going to get a 5-level interchange.
Wiki has a page devoted to "stack interchanges." In the local area, the most famous is the "High-Five" north of Dallas on Texas Highway 75. This was the first of "several proposed 5-level interchanges" for the DFW area. Another one is the "Mixmaster" north of downtown Ft Worth. I don't know what is meant by "several," but I assume about five to seven. I think there are currently either three or four 5-level interchanges currently completed in the Dallas-Ft Worth area.
What intrigues me is this: at the wiki page on "stack interchanges," there is a whole subsection on Texas stacked interchanges.
In the screenshot above, this existing 5-level stacked interchange north of downtown Dallas.
Here is an artist's rendering of the new 5-level stacked interchange proposed for Grapevine, TX, just a mile or so northeast of where I live. Note the wide, long canal: this will be the "Lazy River" inner tube ride for the new water park. The first phase will stretch from Houston to Grapevine (Dallas). The second phase will take the "Lazy River" all the way to Amarillo.
You might find this interesting. There's a person for everything, here Road Guy Rob talks about unique aspects of Texas roads: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NcuM-fjcTD8
ReplyDeleteIt is interesting to learn about how cities are designed (or not designed). Not the point of the linked video, but I'm in the market for walkable US cities. Outside a couple examples sprawl has dominated the US. I find this to be a big squandering of our post-WWII prosperity...but enough complaining from me, obviously sprawl has its upsides.
Thank you. Agree completely with regard to walking. I've pretty much given up on walking in American cities; some exceptions of course.
DeleteOf all the places I've been, walking in England -- both urban and rural -- has been the most enjoyable, most rewarding.
Earlier this year we visited my wife's grandmother in a small town of 5,000 in Northern England. It seemed much more lively and populated than a town of 5,000 in America. Also good for older folks as she can walk 10 minutes to the town square to buy from the markets or easily congregate with friends. It would be nice to have some more of that I'd think.
ReplyDeleteA really short read is "Tribe" by Sebastian Junger. A theme throughout is our need for community with some focus on wartime and veterans returning home. It was some nice framework to add to my mental model.
Yes, the villages in England are spectacular .... and you are correct, a Yorkshire village of 500 (no typo, five hundred) is incredibly livable compared to a town of 500 in the US. A town of 500 in the US usually means the town is dying. But again, I think you can fit the entire country of England (just England) into Montana.
DeleteEngland 50,346 sq miles Pop. 55 million +/-
ReplyDeleteMontana 147,040 sq miles Pop. 1.05 million
And still 3 times more cows than people in Montana
At least you didn't make a joke about the number of sheep in South Dakota. LOL. But that is amazing, isn't it? The state of Montana that much bigger than England and only a million people. Big Sky Country -- well deserved name.
DeleteVery friendly people, we just have very long driveways!
ReplyDelete