Updates
March 30, 2016: the comments at this article on "new jobs" are pretty much in line with my thoughts over the past several years. Comments have in common:
- government statistics on jobs/unemployment are bogus, massaged
- if the "job situation" is go good, why is the Fed hesitant to raise rates?
- one permanent job lost; replaced with two part-time employees (ObamaCare effect)
Original Post
Early morning trading has the market up strongly; the Dow is up almost 130 points.
Crude oil is up about 2.4%, around $40.
Reuters reports that US private employers added 200,000 jobs in March, above economists' expectations. Remember: these are the "magic numbers" with regard to US jobs:
The Magic Numbers
I love the spin: economists had forecast a gain of 194,000, with estimates ranging from 150,000 to 220,000. I would argue the number (200,000) came in right on expectations. For Reuters to say in the very first line "above economists' expectations" suggests a bit of editorial spin for the Obama administration. Just saying.First time claims, unemployment benefits: 400,000 (> 400,000: economic stagnation)New jobs: 200,000 (< 200,000 new jobs: economic stagnation)Economists estimate the labor market needs to create about 125,000 jobs a month to keep the unemployment rate steady, though estimates vary -- Reuters.I will stick with 200,000 (the "magic number" prior to the Obama administration) -- it's a nicer, "rounder" number to remember.
More from the linked article:
The ADP figures come ahead of the U.S. Labor Department's more comprehensive non-farm payrolls report on Friday, which includes both public and private-sector employment.
Economists polled by Reuters are looking for U.S. private payroll employment to have grown by 197,000 jobs in March, down from 230,000 the month before. Total non-farm employment is expected to be 205,000.
At 197,000, this would be below the magic number that was used prior to the Obama administration.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.