Updates
July 20, 2016: in California, a 65-mile pipeline would have cost $621 million.
July 19, 2016: a reader correctly points out why the cost of this short pipeline would be so high: front end engineering, permits, land acquisition, tie-ins - probably hot taps at both ends, valves at both ends, launcher at one end and receiver at other, mob/demob costs = $3MM?, 1 mile of pipeline = $1MM?
I replied: Yes, you are correct. The longer the pipeline, the better the law of large numbers works. A short pipeline with all the requirements at either end is obviously the reason. Thank you.
Original Post
I might have to re-set my "calculator." According to the AP/Bakken.com, these data points:
- ETP seeks a permit for a 1.1 mile-long crude oil pipeline
- $4.5 million project
- from the Ramberg Truck Facility to the ETP Facility about seven miles south of Tioga
- capacity: 70,000 bopd; "normal" amount -- 50,000 bopd
- location of hearing: Neset Consulting Service
When you look at the map, one finds it incredible. The pipeline is between two streets and two avenues -- I mean, we are talking a really, really small connector pipeline -- and it is projected to cost $4.5 million. Wow.
For newbies: when thinking about the cost of this project, that helps put into perspective how incredibly "valuable" the Bakken is.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.