As noted, that is Part 1.
In that post, I highlighted the possibility of a halo effect from fracking this index well:
- 17758, 617, Newfield, Alice Federal 1-28H, Sand Creek, t8/09; cum 102K 11/15;
But what about "index well, part II?
- 18323, 2,654, Newfield, Sand Creek Federal 1-21H, Sand Creek, t3/10; cum 180K 11/15; here's the production profile:
Pool | Date | Days | BBLS Oil | Runs | BBLS Water | MCF Prod | MCF Sold | Vent/Flare |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BAKKEN | 11-2015 | 28 | 7814 | 7866 | 6497 | 14325 | 3951 | 9522 |
BAKKEN | 10-2015 | 18 | 1785 | 1414 | 3205 | 2219 | 993 | 989 |
BAKKEN | 9-2015 | 23 | 311 | 231 | 35 | 758 | 86 | 251 |
BAKKEN | 8-2015 | 31 | 763 | 898 | 40 | 1695 | 358 | 376 |
BAKKEN | 7-2015 | 31 | 714 | 690 | 64 | 2002 | 382 | 659 |
BAKKEN | 6-2015 | 30 | 1113 | 1142 | 213 | 2893 | 0 | 1963 |
BAKKEN | 5-2015 | 31 | 1333 | 1331 | 307 | 3451 | 0 | 2490 |
I've always maintained that the farther the toe is from the boot in a horizontal well, the less effective is the fracking. This well (#18323, Sand Federal) seems to validate that observation (compare this post with the earlier post, Part I). In the long, long article by Mike Filloon that was linked earlier today, Mike suggested the same thing (although I believe it was one of his comments in reply to a reader and not in the main body of the Seeking Alpha post. And finally, EOG's success with short laterals seems to validate my thinking regarding this issue.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.