Friday, January 3, 2020

Equinor Reports Completion Of Fourteen DUCs; Six Wells Came Off Confidential List -- January 3, 2020

Active wells:

$63.051/3/202001/03/201901/03/201801/03/201701/03/2016
Active Rigs5565533960

Two new permits, #37302 - #37303, inclusive:
  • Operator: Hess
  • Field: Big Gulch (Dunn County)
  • Comments:
    • Hess has permits for a two-well LK-Bice pad in section 7-147-96, Big Gulch oil field
Six wells came off the confidential list today:
  • 34173, 911, CLR, Ravin 5-11H2, Dimmick Lake, t7/19; cum 62K 11/19;
  • 34383, SI/NC, BR, Veeder 3B TFH, Blue Buttes, no production data,
  • 34384, SI/NC, BR, Veeder 3A MBH, Blue Buttes, no production data,
  • 35724, 841, Nine Point Energy, State 154-102-25-36-8H, Rosebud, t7/19; cum 93K 11/19;
  • 35780, 1,517, EN-Farhart-156-93-0409H-6, Baskin, t7/19; cum 85K 11/19;
  • 35781, 1,435, Hess, EN-Farhart-156-93-0409H-5, Baskin, t7/19; cum 64K 11/9;
Fourteen producing wells (DUCs) reported as completed: all Equinor wells -- two in McKenzie County; twelve in Williams County; the daily activity reports fifteen DUCs reported, but one, #34675, was listed twice:
  • 34675, 589, Equinor, Jarold 25-36 6TFH, Todd, t9/19; cum 24K 11/19;
  • 34674, 759, Equinor, Jarold 25-36 5H, Todd, t10/19; cum 25K 11/19;
  • 33613, 1,712, Equinor, Broderson 30-31F 8TFH, Banks, t8/19; cum 28K 11/19;
  • 33615, 2,397, Equinor, Broderson 30-31F 7H, Banks, t8/19; cum 40K 11/19;
  • 33611, 2,547, Equinor, Broderson 30-31F 5H, Banks, t8/19; cum 44K 11/19;
  • 33573, 719, Equinor, Elmer Hovland 23-14 XE, 1H, East Fork, t10/19; cum 14K 11/19;
  • 33578, 790, Equinor, Allison 23-14 XW 1TFH, East Fork, t7/19; cum 44K 11/19;
  • 33571, 753, Equinor, Allison 23-14 8TFH, East Fork, t8/19; cum 39K 11/19;
  • 33569, 1,074, Equinor, Allison 23-14 7H, East Fork, t9/19; cum 49K 11/19;
  • 33567, 916, Equinor, Allison 23-14 6TFH, East Fork, t8/19; cum 52K 11/19;
  • 33565, 1,074, Equinor, Allison 23-14 5H, East Fork, t8/19; cum 60K 11/19;
  • 33563, 756, Equinor, Allison 23-14 4TFH, East Fork, t8/19; cum 39K 11/19;
  • 33576, 1,244, Equinor, Allison 23-14 3H, East Fork, t7/19; cum 76K 11/19;
  • 23036, 455, Equinor, Allison 23-14 2TFH, East Fork, t7/19; cum 31K 11/19;

4 comments:

  1. Thought those Banks field wells should be better than that?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I agree completely.

      1. I've never thought Equinor has had particularly good wells. Equinor has a great name/reputation -- state oil company of Norway -- but for some reason Equinor has had mediocre wells at best, it seems, in the Bakekn.

      2. It will be interesting to see the frack/completion strategies -- stages, amount of proppant.

      3. We will only know how good these wells are after several years, but right now, they are disappointing for Banks wells.

      Delete
    2. I have been curious if there is a detrimental effect of letting a DUC sit there for 5 years?

      Delete
    3. Knowing what little I know about tight oil, it wouldn't seem to matter how long a DUC remained uncompleted -- assuming the entire lateral remained intact and the frack was successful. But I certainly wouldn't want anyone to think I know what I'm talking about. LOL.

      The Broderson wells in the Banks, above, were spud in 2018, and completed in 2019.

      Delete

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.