Updates
Later, 3:12 p.m. CDT: dollars and (common) sense --
Using $50/bbl as the price of oil at the wellhead, look at the ten months following the re-frack, and the ten months prior to the re-frack:
Monthly 11,081 661 Monthly 12,157 691 Monthly 13,282 623 Monthly 12,953 697 Monthly 16,648 729 Monthly 20,807 632 Monthly 26,722 701 Monthly 14,371 698 Monthly 17,493 687 Monthly 28,683 689 Total: 10 months 174,197 6,808 at $50/bbl $8,709,850 $340,400
At ten months following the re-frack, which might have cost $4 million, this well has produced almost $9 million in crude oil at $50/bbl. In the ten months prior to the re-frack, this well generated less than $350,000 in crude oil at $50/bbl at the wellhead. Regardless how the operator did, the mineral owners did very, very well.Later, 2:27 p.m. CDT: cost of a re-frack.
Original Post
Huge amounts of time and money were required to drill this greenfield well. The first time. Think about this. Second time around, to re-frack. Like getting a brand new well. But no time getting the lease, pooling, pad built, roads built, other infrastructure, etc; and, all the money saved -- essentially just the cost of a re-frack. And there are thousands of these wells in the Bakken suitable for a first re-frack. And then we have the second re-frack. And a third. Rinse and repeat.
The well:
- 16964, 315, MRO, Voigt 11-15H, Bailey, t5/18; cum 354K 8/18; re-fracked once;
Pool | Date | Days | BBLS Oil | Runs | BBLS Water | MCF Prod | MCF Sold | Vent/Flare |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BAKKEN | 8-2018 | 31 | 11081 | 11033 | 9680 | 9831 | 8939 | 0 |
BAKKEN | 7-2018 | 31 | 12157 | 12119 | 10689 | 10459 | 8965 | 532 |
BAKKEN | 6-2018 | 30 | 13283 | 13261 | 11861 | 9934 | 8482 | 431 |
BAKKEN | 5-2018 | 31 | 12953 | 13039 | 10748 | 9026 | 6753 | 1266 |
BAKKEN | 4-2018 | 30 | 16648 | 16633 | 15390 | 12130 | 6074 | 4097 |
BAKKEN | 3-2018 | 31 | 20807 | 20900 | 21866 | 12733 | 5915 | 4409 |
BAKKEN | 2-2018 | 28 | 22590 | 22465 | 25176 | 13676 | 7280 | 3814 |
BAKKEN | 1-2018 | 31 | 26722 | 26704 | 33136 | 17924 | 13520 | 1364 |
BAKKEN | 12-2017 | 27 | 14371 | 14369 | 18379 | 8339 | 2272 | 4386 |
BAKKEN | 11-2017 | 30 | 17493 | 17345 | 21327 | 9561 | 505 | 7006 |
BAKKEN | 10-2017 | 22 | 28683 | 28727 | 554 | 16075 | 0 | 12881 |
BAKKEN | 9-2017 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
BAKKEN | 8-2017 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
BAKKEN | 7-2017 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
BAKKEN | 6-2017 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
BAKKEN | 5-2017 | 5 | 89 | 64 | 10 | 58 | 0 | 40 |
BAKKEN | 4-2017 | 30 | 661 | 663 | 148 | 541 | 0 | 292 |
Re-frack: 8/22/17 -- 9/14/18; 4.9 million gallons of water; a small to moderate frack; 87.2% water by mass.
Original frack/geologist's note:
the lateral generated an exposure of 9,006 feet of 6" hole through the gross middle Bakken. The lateral well bore remained approximately 84% in the target zone and 100% in the gross middle Bakken. Background gas as high as 5,000 units. The middle Bakken must have been about 30 feet thick: the well path landed about 15 feet into the middle Bakken in the middle of the target zone. On May 12, 2008, the well was tested after stimulation with 546,700 pounds of 40/70 sand.Initial production:
BAKKEN | 2-2009 | 28 | 3977 | 3981 | 1094 | 1655 | 1655 | 0 |
BAKKEN | 1-2009 | 13 | 1728 | 1448 | 960 | 659 | 659 | 0 |
BAKKEN | 12-2008 | 17 | 2035 | 2098 | 467 | 596 | 596 | 0 |
BAKKEN | 11-2008 | 30 | 2863 | 3008 | 537 | 1113 | 1113 | 0 |
BAKKEN | 10-2008 | 31 | 2550 | 2550 | 378 | 975 | 975 | 0 |
BAKKEN | 9-2008 | 30 | 2511 | 2590 | 407 | 1160 | 1160 | 0 |
BAKKEN | 8-2008 | 31 | 3426 | 3223 | 615 | 1587 | 1587 | 0 |
BAKKEN | 7-2008 | 31 | 4013 | 4080 | 708 | 1657 | 1657 | 0 |
BAKKEN | 6-2008 | 30 | 5714 | 5895 | 975 | 1797 | 1797 | 0 |
BAKKEN | 5-2008 | 24 | 6990 | 6599 | 1117 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
BAKKEN | 4-2008 | 12 | 903 | 696 | 303 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Amazing, huh?
On December 28, 2015, the well qualified for "stripper well status."
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.