Wednesday, September 12, 2012

Others Are Using Unique Format For Reporting Wells; File This Under Flattered

I see someone snuck in one of my posts elsewhere! Lots of fun.

Enquiring minds were interested in more detailed production data for:

  • 22151, 1,538, Denbury, Tobacco Garden 41-18SH, Tobacco Garden, t6/12; cum 34K 7/12

Either that (copying and pasting my data to BSDG) or others are using my unique format: file number; IP in bold/red; oil field; test date followed by cumulative production as of the state date.  I'm looking for this format to be used as a crawler on Bloomberg someday. Hooah!

Anyway, here's the more detailed production numbers for this well:

Completion Data
   Pool: BAKKEN     Perfs: 12027-18712     Comp: 5/22/2012     Status: F     Date: 6/3/2012     Spacing: 2SEC
Cumulative Production Data
   Pool: BAKKEN     Cum Oil: 34033     Cum MCF Gas: 31377     Cum Water: 12480
Production Test Data
   IP Test Date: 6/3/2012     Pool: BAKKEN     IP Oil: 1538     IP MCF: 2123     IP Water: 697
Monthly Production Data
PoolDateDaysBBLS OilRunsBBLS WaterMCF ProdMCF SoldVent/Flare


  1. Replies
    1. You have no idea how thrilled I was to see that. Seriously.

      I think the shorthand format that I use tells the minimum amount of information needed to get an idea of the well.

      It looks like a great/good well. Congrats if it's your well.

      But, again, I was thrilled to see the format used. Thank you.

    2. No, just alongside our well that is due to report at the end of the month. Fingers crossed for one equal or even better ...