In today's daily activity report, it appears that CLR has permits for six more wells in this field. Again, I can make huge mistakes, and this could be another mistake, but if I'm reading this correctly, CLR will have 8 + 6 wells in this section: 14 wells.
CLR: six new permits announced today in section 16-152-99, Banks oil field:
- 24837, loc, CLR, Wahpeton 2-16H2, Banks,
- 24838, loc, CLR, Wahpeton 3-16H3, Banks,
- 24840, loc, CLR, Wahpeton 4-16H1, Banks,
- 24842, loc, CLR, Wahpeton 5-16H2, Banks,
- 24843, loc, CLR, Wahpeton 6-16H, Banks,
- 24844, loc, CLR, Wahpeton 6-16H3, Banks,
- 19450, 322, CLR, Wahpeton 1-16H, t7/11; cum 110K 11/12; still flowing 6K bbls/month;
- 19858, 1, 349, CLR, Jamestown 1-7H, t3/12; cum 119K 11/12; still flowing at 10K bbls/month;
That must be the biggest well in Jamestown this year. Now Jamestown will ask for oil impact grants.
ReplyDeleteAnon -
CLR has a history of naming towns after home towns: I think it has to do with hometowns of their roughnecks....smile...
DeleteThis is one section E of the Charlotte wells. It is also the spacing used in the illustration you posted last week, proposed well pattern for increased density-showing 34 + wells
ReplyDeleteThank you. It really is incredible isn't it?
DeleteA lot rests on the results of these 14+ wells. It will be interesting to follow.
Thank you for taking time to write. I will probably add to this post with your information, but I have a pretty bad "cold" tonight -- not the "flu" but ill nonetheless, so will call it a night early.
Thank you very much for writing. This is a big help. Especially to confirm that I had not made a mistake; as noted, I'm still a bit gun shy after recent error. I'm sure glad I link my sources. Smile.
I've posted the link for the graphic to make it easier to access.
Delete