Locator: 46644IRA.
Key dates to remember with regard to IRAs:
- 1970
- 1981
- 1997
When did IRAs truly start to impact the economy? I would argue, 1995, to some extent, but then took off in 2007:
- 1970: traditional IRA introduced
- 1980: folks became comfortable with IRAs
- 1997: IRAs improved by a huge amount with the introduction of Roth IRAs
- 2007: another ten years of traditional IRA / Roth IRA growth in popularity
Now, look at this graph:
Same chart with markers and comments:
Demographics, US:
Look at this, and no one seems to be mentioning this.
Age when one can start taking distributions from one's IRAs: 59.5 years of age.
IRA RMDs by demographic (note, data is somewhat old):
- silent generation: minimal impact on economy with regard to RMDs
- those who have IRAs are probably using RMDs for nursing home expenses
- baby boomers: biggest impact on economy with regard to RMDs
- those born in 1964: turn 78 years of age this year
- those born in 1946: turn 60 years of age
- in other words, every -- repeat, every baby boomer can now take RMDs
- my wife has been taking distributions before they were required and now RMDs for maybe ten years and despite the withdrawals year-after year, her IRA continues to grow
- I start taking my first RMDs this year
- almost all baby boomers can now tap into their social security benefits
- almost all baby boomers are covered by Medicare. Medicare benefits got even better in 2024 (thank you, Mr Biden), seniors will spend less money on healthcare (all things being equal)
- 529s: a lot of baby boomers (GRANDPARENTS) are going to look for tax-advantage accounts to place RMDs they don't need for current expenses
- 529s have vastly improved starting this year (or last year?) making these investment vehicles look even better -- I'm having trouble finding a better place to re-invest my RMDs
- interestingly, one can argue that 529s are even better than IRAs
- generation X: will start to make impact this year but not much, but it will continue to grow every year for the next decade or so
- those born in 1980: turn 44 years old this year; no impact on economy with regard to RMDs but starting to hit max income / max productive years of their lives
- the younger Xers, now in the best years of their lives, financially, are now more likely to fund IRAs and that will help set a floor for the equity market;
- those born in 1965: turn 59 years old this year!
- this is the biggie
- starting this year, generation X folks can start tapping their IRAs; it doesn't mean that they will but it means that if they don't, they have enough other income to offset any need for IRA distribution (meaning strong financial status for those folks)
- again, this is huge
- Roth IRAs have been around 27 years and the last 27 years have been great for investors, but
- even better: the way the market behaved last year and how the market is now behaving in the second half of January, 2024, a lot of folks are getting excited
- my hunch: a lot of folks are taking some / all of their RMDs this month; if not their entire RMD, taking a fourth to half of their annual RMD
- only a few more years and Xers will also be able to access social security benefits, also
On top of all this, this "RMD story" is not going to go away. Year-after-year RMDs will increase in dollar amounts, but whether they increase or not, they will never quit.
And we haven't even begun to talk about "inherited RMDs":
- "inherited RMDs"? Reminder, oldest baby boomers turn 78 years of age this year -- IRS life expectancy for IRAs tend to trend toward 100 years of age -- taking only minimal RMDs, the vast majority of IRAs will still be funded and growing when their own dies.
- unlike owners of IRAs who can spread their RMDs over a life expectancy (26 years or longer), beneficiaries (those who inherit IRAs) must deplete those IRAs in ten years.
- one word: wow.
RMDs makes my life interesting. Started with a Keogh plan in 1979; rolled into a regular IRA in 1996 and never contributed since. Of course it continues to grow; heck, the RMA for my age is just a tad over 5%.... Wished I could have converted to a Roth, never able to pull that off. So, I'd say sadly (but I'd probably be lying) I'm taxed on the RMD at about the same rate as the contributions were deducted. Paying the tax "back in the day" and feeding a Roth (and just investing the rest in dividend paying stocks) would have been the better choice. Now I end up paying tax at regular rates on the "dividends" earned in the IRA. Too soon old, too late smart!!
ReplyDeleteAgree 1000%. I have the very same story. I've talked about this before on the blog. Many, many brokers, analysts and other experts recommend traditional IRAs over (instead of Roth IRAs) using illogical reasoning. I am now putting together a lessons-learned pamphlet (electronic) for the grandchildren.
DeleteSee this post (https://themilliondollarway.blogspot.com/2022/01/child-tax-credit-could-pivot-to.html) and then the link inside the post (https://themilliondollarway.blogspot.com/2021/10/notes-from-all-over-part-1-sports-jobs.html).
DeleteIt gets even better. Because we lived below our means for many years, we now "enjoy" an additional 3.8% Medicare tax on our RMD payouts, possibly to supplement those who didn't... Is this a great country or what?
ReplyDeleteMore here: https://www.peoplekeep.com/blog/what-is-the-additional-medicare-tax-for-high-earners.
DeleteWhenever I see these extra fees or taxes, my goal is to earn that much more through investing to offset the additional fees / taxes.