Updates
May 8, 2020: production data updated; nothing remarkable;
October 21, 2018: looked at production numbers for all these wells on this date; nothing exciting; did not update the "cums."
Original Post
This might be a good well to follow to get a better idea of how the "Bakken works." Note that the file report revealed that this CLR well was fracked the "new" high-volume proppant technique but the 24-hour test result was not provided (at the time of the original post; since then the IP has been reported).
- 27873, A/see below, CLR, Daniel 4-33H, Stoneview, middle Bakken, 4 sections, stimulated 7/22/14 but 24-hour flow not provide; 40 stages; 7.8 million lbs,
- 27872, 625, CLR, Daniel 2-33H, Stoneview, t10/14; cum 170K 3/20;
- 27871, 775, CLR, Daniel 3-33H1, Stoneview, TF1, 30 stages; 5.8 million lbs sand; t10/14; cum 145K 3/20;
- 27873, 639, CLR, Daniel 4-33H, Stoneview, t10/14; cum 200K 3/20;
- 27868, 476, CLR, Skar 2-28H1, Stoneview, t2/15; cum 135K 3/20;
- 27869, 476, CLR, Skar 3-28H, Stoneview, t3/15; cum 134K 3/20;
- 27870, A, CLR, Skar 4-28H1, Stoneview, cum 148K 3/20;
- 15642, 307, CLR, Skar 1-21H, Stoneview, t6/08; cum 197K 3/20;
no below to see
ReplyDeleteWhenever I post the same well more than once in the same post, I don't want to duplicate efforts/waste time updating both citations. So, in this case, this is a reminder to myself (and others) that later on down the road when I update production numbers, they need to look "down below" where all the wells are. I do the same thing when I post "new wells reporting."
Delete